Authors : Ahmad Walid Farahmand; Mushtaq Hussain Jafari; Naheeda Niazi

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2bdej7sr

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdfj9z8m

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug331

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Correction of refractive errors such as myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism plays a crucial role in maintaining individuals' quality of life. Given the two primary options—eyeglasses and contact lenses—the choice between them has consistently been an important concern among patients and ophthalmology specialists. The aim of this study was to compare the advantages, disadvantages, efficiency, and health impacts of using eyeglasses and contact lenses. This research was conducted through a library-based (literature review) method, reviewing credible scientific sources, research articles, and clinical reports published over the past decade. The collected data were analyzed based on criteria such as ease of use, cost, impact on ocular health, user satisfaction, and visual quality. Findings indicate that eyeglasses, due to their ease of use, lower cost, and higher safety in preventing eye infections, are more suitable for a broad range of users. In contrast, contact lenses offer a wider field of vision, greater freedom of movement, and improved cosmetic appearance, resulting in higher satisfaction among active individuals and athletes. However, the use of contact lenses requires strict adherence to hygiene practices, and improper care increases the risk of infections and ocular complications. Therefore, the choice between eyeglasses and contact lenses should be made based on individual lifestyle, professional recommendations, and the user's health conditions.

Keywords : Contact Lenses, Eyeglasses, Vision Correction, Quality of Life, Refractive Errors.

References :

1. Aghili, F. S., Asgari-Zadeh, F., Naroui-Nouri, F., Rajabi, S., Rakhshandadi, T., & Khorrami-Nejad, M. (2018). Wetting angle and moisture absorbance of contact lenses. Mashhad Journal of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, 7(1), 69-83.
2. Bagheri, A., Abbasi, H., Tavakkoli, M., Shibani-Zadeh, A. R., & Kheiri, B. (2015). The effect of gas-permeable rigid contact lenses in improving nystagmus movements and visual quality in patients with congenital nystagmus and astigmatism. Bina Ophthalmology Journal, 21(2), 101-107.
3. Chamberlain, P., Dableton, K., & Palmby, J. (2019). New lenses for myopia control: A review of key clinical points. Optometry and Vision Science, 96(6), 456-464.
4. Jones-Jordan, L. A., Chitkara, M., Coffey, B., Jackson, J. M., Manny, R. E., Rah, M. J., & Walline, J. J. (2010). A comparison of spectacle and contact lens wearing times in the ACHIEVE study. Clinical & experimental optometry, 93(3), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-0938.2010.00480.x
5. Rostgar, A., Besharati, M. R., & Shoja, M. R. (2011). Results of secondary intraocular lens implantation in Yazd hospitals. Bina Ophthalmology Journal, 13(3), 295-304.
6. Taheri, S. M., & Khail-Tash, A. (2008). Determining the power of intraocular lenses (IOL) after radial keratotomy (RK). Bina Ophthalmology Journal, 13(3), 295-304.
7. Ziaei, H., Katibe, M., Sabaghi, M., & Yasari, M. (2011). The effect of photorefractive keratectomy surgery, contact lenses, and glasses on the quality of life of patients with myopia. Bina Ophthalmology Journal, 17(2), 148-154.