Authors : Surbhi Ranga; Dr. Veenodini Warhade; Dr. Janardhan Vishvanath Bhatt; Dr. Manisha Makwana; Dr. Charushila Rukadikar

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/y35pyj3r

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdhn9snc

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1123

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : Introduction: Air conditioning (AC) has become a widespread necessity in modern environments, especially in urban and industrial areas. Despite its benefits in providing comfort, concerns are rising regarding the long-term effects of AC exposure on respiratory health. This study aims to compare pulmonary function test (PFT) results between individuals regularly exposed to air conditioning and those not exposed to it, to better understand the potential effects on lung function.  Aim and Objectives: This paper was intended to evaluate the impact of air conditioning on lung function by comparing PFT outcomes of people who use air conditioning and those who do not. The first objective was to determine if respiratory health is affected after exposure to air conditioning.  Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted for a period of 2.5 years. Two hundred participants from Kalol, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, 5 years of study. The participants were categorized into two groups: AC users were defined as those people who had used air conditioning for more than six hours a day for at least one year while non-AC users were those who had no regular exposure to AC. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1), Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) and Forced Expiratory Flow 25-75% (FEF25-75%) pulmonary function tests were conducted using Portable Spirometer (Helios 702). The data was analyzed by unpaired t-test and chi-square test.  Results: Results demonstrated significant reductions in lung function among AC users compared to non-AC users. Predicted FVC was significantly lower in AC users (2.31 ± 0.91 L) compared to non-AC users (3.37 ± 0.92 L, p < 0.0001). Similarly, predicted PEFR, FEF25-75% were significantly lower in AC users (p = 0.04 for both parameters). No significant differences were found in FEV1 or FEV1/FVC ratio among 2 groups (p = 0.41 and 0.89, respectively). The findings suggest that prolonged AC exposure can reduce lung volumes and affect small airway function.  Conclusion: This study demonstrates that prolonged exposure to air conditioning may adversely affect lung volumes and airflow, particularly in the smaller airways. No significant differences were observed in FEV1 and FEV1/FVC ratio, the significant reductions in FVC, FEFR, and FEF25-75% highlight the potential respiratory risks associated with chronic AC exposure. Public health initiatives should emphasize proper AC maintenance and monitoring of lung function in individuals exposed to air conditioning for extended periods, particularly in occupational settings.

Keywords : Air Conditioning, Pulmonary Function Tests, FVC, FEV1, Small Airway Function, Respiratory Health, Occupational Exposure.

References :

1. American Thoracic Society. Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152(3):1107-36.
2. Tanaka T, Sawano H, Nishihara Y, et al. Impact of air conditioning on respiratory health: A comparative study in young adults. J Environ Public Health. 2010;2010: Article ID 491058.
3. Al-Hazmi A, Hassan S, Alghamdi S. The effects of long-term air conditioning exposure on respiratory function in office workers. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54(2):187-92.
4. Jacobs P, Fischer S, Scholz S. Mold growth in air conditioning systems: A health risk. Indoor Built Environ. 2013;22(5):699-707.
5. Yoon C, Park S, Lee Y. Effects of air conditioning on indoor air quality and respiratory symptoms in asthmatic children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49(4):385-9.
6. Huang H, Li Y, Qian J. Air conditioning and its health impacts: Beneficial or harmful for patients with COPD? Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016;11:2001-13.
7. American Lung Association. Indoor air pollution and lung health: The role of air conditioning. Lung Assoc Rep. 2014;12:1-5.
8. Alhazmi T, Murad A, Halabi K. PFTamong AC users: A cross-sectional study. Saudi J Health Sci. 2016;5(2):98-104.
9. Institute of Medicine. Clearing the air: Asthma and indoor air exposures. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2000.
10. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Guidelines for indoor air quality in office buildings. NIOSH Publication No. 2020-102.
11. Hulke SM, Patil PM, Thakare AE, Vaidya YP. Lung function test in AC users. J Clin Diagn Res. 2012;6(1):18-20.
12. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(2):319-38.
13. Crapo RO, Morris AH, Gardner RM. Reference spirometric values using techniques and equipment that meet ATS recommendations. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1981;123(6):659-64.
14. Seppänen O, Fisk WJ, Lei QH. Ventilation and performance in office work. Indoor Air. 2006;16(1):28-36.
15. Yang C, Lee J, Kim S. Impact of air conditioning system maintenance on respiratory health in patients with asthma and COPD. J Respir Health. 2019;45(3):235-43.
16. Zhuang X, Li Y, Ma H. The role of AC filtration capacity in reducing indoor allergens and improving respiratory function. Indoor Air. 2020;30(2):235-43.
17. Wang Q, Zhang P, Liu H. The impact of indoor humidity levels in air-conditioned environments on pulmonary outcomes. J Clin Respir Res. 2021;17(1) :112-18.