Authors : Utkarsh Srivastava; Jaya Sharma

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mv26peru

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may1403

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This research investigates the influence of employment status on women's psychological well-being through a study of three key dimensions: stress, coping mechanisms, and perceived social support. In the present socio-cultural context of India, women tend to negotiate the challenges of dual roles—professional and domestic—and these may have a profound effect on their mental health. On the other hand, women who are not working experience unique emotional issues, such as social invisibility and dependency. Research in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, involved 100 women, 60 working women, and 40 non-working women who volunteered. A self-designed, 25-item questionnaire measured levels of stress, the categories of coping, and the amount of perceived social support. It proved good in internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84. Analysis was conducted using SPSS Version 25, with descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, and Pearson correlation employed to compare variables between groups. Results indicated that employed women reported higher stress levels than non-employed women, but also employed more active coping styles. Perceived social support did not vary between the groups significantly. There was a moderate positive relationship between stress and coping that suggested women under greater stress also used coping strategies more frequently. These findings highlight the need for employment-sensitive mental health interventions. Organizational and community action must be adapted to the demands of employed and unemployed Indian women. These patterns can be used to inform policy, workplace reform, and social programs to strengthen the psychological resilience of women

Keywords : Stress, Coping Mechanisms, Social Support, Working Women, Non-Working Women, Mental Health, Cronbach's Alpha.

References :

1. Cohen, S. and Wills, T. A., “Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 310–357, 1985.
2. Folkman, S. and Moskowitz, J. T., “Coping: Pitfalls and promises,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, pp. 745–774, 2004.
3. Matud, M. P., “Gender differences in stress and coping styles,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1401–1415, 2004.
4. Tavakol, M. and Dennick, R., “Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha,” International Journal of Medical Education, vol. 2, pp. 53–55, 2011.
5. Thoits, P. A., “Mechanisms linking social ties and support to physical and mental health,” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 145–161, 2011.