Authors : Mareeswaran P; Murali C.R; Shanmugam K T; Kesavan G; Ajith Kumar; Anjali A; Beneesh V K

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yc4samw6

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mbyxarhy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY2266

Abstract : Aim The aim is to study, compare and analyse the enamel rod end patterns in healthy and fluorosed teeth for person identification.  Methodology A total of 120 participants were taken for our study, categorized into 2 groups, Group I consists of fluorosed teeth and Group II consists of Normal teeth, each group comprised of 30 males and 30 females. In anteriors, maxillary central incisor and canine and in posteriors, first premolars were selected. So a total of 360 samples were recorded for the analysis. Acetate peel technique was used for recording the tooth print and Verifinger® standard SDK version 11.1 software was used for analysis.  Results Our study showed that the fluorosed teeth showed a difference from complete to incomplete or inter-rupted pattern unlike normal teeth which had a complete pattern only. The variation in the enamel rod end patterns between normal and fluorosed teeth was statistically significant in central incisor and canine respectively but not in premolars. Also the variation in enamel rod end patterns between the gender was statistically significant among central incisor, canine and premolar.  Conclusion Ameloglyphics is a recent evolving forensic tool for personal identification. The procedure is painless and is based on the enamel rod patterns on the surface of tooth.

Keywords : Person Identification, Enamel Rod Pattern, Ameloglyphics, Forensic Odontology.

References :

1. Divakar KP. Forensic Odontology: The New Dimension in Dental Analysis. Int J Biomed Sci. 2017;13(1):1-5.
2. P Ahuja, A Manchanda. Application Of Oral Hard And Soft Tissue Structures In Sex Determination. The Internet Journal of Forensic Science. 2009 Volume 4 Number 2.
3. Ramenzoni LL, Line SR. Automated biometrics-based personal identification of the Hunter-Schreger bands of dental enamel. Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273(1590):1155-1158.
4. Manjunath K, Sriram G, Saraswathi TR, Sivapathasundharam B. Enamel rod end patterns: A preliminary study using acetate peel technique and automated biometrics. J Forensic Odontol 2008;1:33-6.
5. Ehtisham, Mohammad & Nissar, Sheeba. (2016). Role Of Forensic Dentistry In Human Identification: “Evidence That Does Not Lie”.University Journal of Dental Sciences. 1. 66-74.
6. Naziya J, Sunil S, Jayanthi P, Rathy R, Harish R K. Analysis of enamel rod end pattern for personal identification. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2019;23:165
7. Cakan DG, Ulkur F, Taner T. The genetic basis of dental anomalies and its relation to orthodontics. Eur J Dent. 2013;7(Suppl 1):S143-S147. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.119092
8. Priyadharsini N, Malathi N, Tamizhchelvan H, Dineshkumar T. Dental fluorosis: A histological study using Light and Confocal microscopy. Indian J Dent Res 2015;26:248-51
9. Sarvaiya B U, Bhayya D, Arora R, Mehta D N. Prevalence of dental fluorosis in relation with different fluoride levels in drinking water among school going children in Sarada tehsil of Udaipur district, Rajasthan. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2012;30:317-22
10. Manjunath K, Sivapathasundharam B, Saraswathi T. Efficacy of various materials in recording enamel rod endings on tooth surface for personal identification. J Forensic Dent Sci 2011;3:71-6.
11. Manjunath K, Saraswathi TR, Sriram G, Sivapathasundharam B, Porchelvam S -"Reliability of automated biometrics in the analysis of enamel rod end patterns." Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences, vol. 1, no. 1, Jan.-June 2009, p. 32.
12. Girish H, Murgod S, Ravath CM, Hegde RB. Ameloglyphics and predilection of dental caries. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013 May;17(2):181-184.
13. Min Jei, Yu P, Xu Z, Li Z, Zhang Q, Yu H, Gao S. Investigation on the Gradient Nanomechanical Behavior of Dental Fluorosis Enamel. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018 Oct 30;13(1):347.