Authors :
Jemima N. A. A. Lomotey
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yc32pxw7
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/42pmw7e9
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug904
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Work ethic is a critical determinant of organizational productivity, employee engagement, and national
development. This study examined work ethic among Ghanaian workers across multiple industries, identifying individual,
organizational, and socio-cultural factors that drive diligence, responsibility, and professionalism. A mixed-methods design
was employed, incorporating structured questionnaires from 250 employees and semi-structured interviews with 30
participants across banking, healthcare, manufacturing, education, and public service sectors. Quantitative analysis
included ANOVA and hierarchical regression, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Findings revealed
significant differences in work ethic across industries, with intrinsic motivation and conscientiousness emerging as the
strongest individual predictors. Organizational factors such as leadership, recognition, and reward systems, as well as socio-
cultural influences like cultural norms and societal expectations, also significantly influenced work ethic. The study
highlights the multidimensional nature of work ethic and underscores the importance of integrating personal,
organizational, and cultural considerations in workforce management. Practical implications include employee
development, organizational policy improvements, and sector-specific strategies to enhance work ethic and productivity in
Ghanaian workplaces.
Keywords :
Work Ethic, Ghanaian Workers, Industry Comparison, Organizational Factors, Socio-Cultural Influences.
References :
- Amah, E. (2018). The impact of organizational culture on employee performance: Evidence from the Nigerian banking sector. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v13n3p141
- Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Seidu, E. Y. M., & Otaye, L. E. (2016). Developing and leveraging human capital resource to enhance performance: Test of a theory-driven model. Journal of Management, 42(6), 1755–1788. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314543474
- Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
- Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
- Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (2000). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Basic Books.
- Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Wiley.
- Jain, A. K., & Duggal, S. (2019). Impact of work environment on employee performance: A study of FMCG sector. International Journal of Management Studies, 6(3), 44–54.
- Lau, C. M., & Ngo, H. Y. (2004). The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation. International Business Review, 13(6), 685–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.004
- Mensah, A. O., & Oteng-Abayie, E. F. (2019). Leadership style and organizational performance: Empirical evidence from Ghanaian organizations. Journal of African Business, 20(3), 393–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228916.2018.1489345
- Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage Publications.
- Mullins, L. J. (2016). Management and organizational behavior (11th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2014). Organizational climate and employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(6), 695–718. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1912
- Obisi, C. (2001). Managing organizational culture for effective performance in Nigerian organizations. Journal of Management Development, 20(8), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006153
- Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143809
- Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
- Zhao, S., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(3), 647–680. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00087.x.
Work ethic is a critical determinant of organizational productivity, employee engagement, and national
development. This study examined work ethic among Ghanaian workers across multiple industries, identifying individual,
organizational, and socio-cultural factors that drive diligence, responsibility, and professionalism. A mixed-methods design
was employed, incorporating structured questionnaires from 250 employees and semi-structured interviews with 30
participants across banking, healthcare, manufacturing, education, and public service sectors. Quantitative analysis
included ANOVA and hierarchical regression, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. Findings revealed
significant differences in work ethic across industries, with intrinsic motivation and conscientiousness emerging as the
strongest individual predictors. Organizational factors such as leadership, recognition, and reward systems, as well as socio-
cultural influences like cultural norms and societal expectations, also significantly influenced work ethic. The study
highlights the multidimensional nature of work ethic and underscores the importance of integrating personal,
organizational, and cultural considerations in workforce management. Practical implications include employee
development, organizational policy improvements, and sector-specific strategies to enhance work ethic and productivity in
Ghanaian workplaces.
Keywords :
Work Ethic, Ghanaian Workers, Industry Comparison, Organizational Factors, Socio-Cultural Influences.