Authors : Lekshmi M. S.; Deepthi Rani S. S.

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3t3u2c28

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdkprxxb

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul1690

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Postpartum depression (PPD) presents a significant mental health concern for new mothers, often going undetected due to limitations in conventional screening methods like the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). This project proposes a machine learning-based web application designed to automate PPD risk assessment. The system leverages a Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network (FFANN) model trained on EPDS scores, achieving a prediction accuracy of 95%. Developed using Streamlit, the platform allows users to input their responses, visualize results via interactive charts, and download personalized reports in PDF format. A literature review of ten existing methods—ranging from traditional ML algorithms to deep learning and neuro-fuzzy models—was conducted for comparison. The system also includes mental health resources and a feedback mechanism, offering a comprehensive and accessible solution for early- stage PPD screening. The tool demonstrates the feasibility of integrating machine learning into maternal mental healthcare, aiming to improve timely intervention and support.

Keywords : Postpartum Depression, Machine Learning, EPDS, Feed-Forward Artificial Neural Network, Streamlit, Mental Health Screening, Real-Time Prediction, PDF Report Generation, Maternal Care, Deep Learning.

References :

1. S. Shorey, C. Y. I. Chee, E. D. Ng, Y. H. Chan, W. W. S. Tam, and Y. S. Chong, “Des - Prevalence and incidence of postpartum depression among healthy mothers: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J. Psychiatr. Res., vol. 104, pp. 235–248, Sep. 2018
2. “Blog Postpartum Depression.” https://www.ahealthblog.com/ ?s=postpartum+ (accessed Feb. 15, 2022).
3. “Des - NJSHAD - Query Result - New Jersey PRAMS Data – Postpartum Depression.” https://www-doh.state.nj.us/dohshad/query/result/prams/PRAMS/Postp Depress12.html (accessed Sep. 19, 2021).
4. E. Jones and E. Coast, “Social relationships and postpartum depression in South Asia: A systematic review,” International Journal of Social Psychiatry, vol. 59, no. 7. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0020764012453675.
5. D. J et al., “Prenatal depression, prenatal anxiety, and spontaneous preterm birth: a prospective cohort study among women with early and regular care,” Psychosom. Med., vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 938–946, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1097/01.PSY.0000244025.20549.BD.
6. M. S and S. A, “Postpartum Depression Screening at Well-Child Appointments: A Quality Improvement Project,” J. Pediatr. Health Care, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 178–183, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1016/J.PEDHC.2016.07.003
7. Q. Fan et al., “Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression in Sri Lanka: A population-based study,” Asian J. Psychiatr., vol. 47, p. 101855, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.AJP.2019.101855.
8. “Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS).” http://www.perinatalservicesbc.ca/health-professionals/professionalres ources/health-promo/edinburgh-postnatal-depression-scale-(epds) (accessed Aug. 18, 2021).
9. S. Andersson, D. R. Bathula, S. I. Iliadis, M. Walter, and A. Skalkidou, “Predicting women with depressive symptoms postpartum with machine learning methods,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2021, doi:u 10.1038/s41598-021-86368-y
10. D. Shin, K. J. Lee, T. Adeluwa, and J. Hur, “Machine Learning-Based Predictive Modeling of Postpartum Depression,” J. Clin. Med., vol. 9, no. 9, p. 2899, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/jcm9092899