A Decennial Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Analysis of Occupational Deep and Shallow Doses at a Nigerian Tertiary Hospital (2015–2024)


Authors : Salihu A. Yusuf; Halilu S. Daniel; Abdulmumini K. Yusuf

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/z65yjn2n

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/uywe8xyj

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan082

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Background: Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation is an unavoidable risk in diagnostic radiology. Long-term monitoring of radiation dose to healthcare workers is essential for ensuring compliance with international safety standards and minimizing deterministic and stochastic health effects (ICRP, 2007; UNSCEAR, 2020).  Objective: To evaluate decennial trends (2015–2024) in occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic radiology personnel at Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University Teaching Hospital (ATBUTH), Bauchi, Nigeria, using thermoluminescent dosimetry.  Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted among 30 radiology personnel with uninterrupted thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) monitoring. Quarterly deep dose equivalent (Hₚ(10)) and shallow dose equivalent (Hₚ(0.07)) values were aggregated annually and analyzed descriptively. Observed doses were compared with International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) occupational dose limits.  Results: The mean annual effective dose (Hₚ(10)) was 2.00 ± 0.60 mSv, representing approximately 10% of the ICRP annual occupational limit. Radiographers recorded the highest exposure levels, followed by radiologists, while technicians had the lowest doses. Occasional quarterly elevations—particularly in shallow dose—were observed. Occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic radiology personnel at ATBUTH remained within internationally recommended limits over the ten-year period. However, episodic dose increases highlight the need for continuous optimization of radiation protection practices and sustained training programs.

Keywords : Occupational Radiation Exposure; Thermoluminescent Dosimetry; Diagnostic Radiology; Deep Dose; Shallow Dose; ALARA; Nigeria.

References :

  1. Abuzaid, M. M., Noorajan, Z., Elshami, W., & Ibham, M. (2024). Monitoring occupational radiation dose in radiography students: Implications for safety and training. Safety, 10(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10020035
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2014). Occupational radiation protection in diagnostic and interventional radiology (Safety Standards Series No. GSR Part 3). IAEA.
  3. International Atomic Energy Agency. (2018). Radiation protection and safety in medical uses of ionizing radiation (GSG-2). IAEA.
  4. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2007). The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP Publication 103). Annals of the ICRP, 37(2–4), 1–332.
  5. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2012). ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs (ICRP Publication 118). Annals of the ICRP, 41(1–2), 1–322.
  6. International Commission on Radiological Protection. (2017). Occupational radiological protection in interventional procedures (ICRP Publication 135). Annals of the ICRP, 46(2).
  7. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. (2011). Operational quantities for radiation protection (ICRU Report 85). Journal of the ICRU, 11(1).
  8. Miller, D. L., Vañó, E., Bartal, G., et al. (2010). Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: A joint guideline. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 21(5), 607–615.
  9. National Research Council. (2006). Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. National Academies Press.
  10. Okawele, K. N., Nathaniel, E. U., & Ekanem, A. M. (2024). Occupational radiation dose absorbed by radiographers in Port Harcourt, Rivers State. Researchers Journal of Science and Technology, 4(1), 21–31.
  11. Omojola, A. D., Onoride, M. A., Akpochafor, S., et al. (2018). Personnel radiation dose assessment using a novel dosimeter in Nigeria. The European Research Journal, 4(2), 70–78.
  12. Sultan Qaboos University Hospital Radiation Protection Research Group. (2021). Assessment of occupational radiation doses in Oman. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 197(1), 36–45.
  13. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. (2020). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: UNSCEAR 2020 Report. United Nations.
  14. Usman, S., Joseph, D. S., Muhammad, B. G., & Joseph, D. Z. (2020). Evaluation of occupational radiation exposure in Katsina, Nigeria. FUDMA Journal of Sciences, 4(2), 722–729.
  15. World Health Organization. (2013). Guidance on the implementation of the ALARA principle in medical exposure (WHO Technical Report Series No. 972). WHO.

Background: Occupational exposure to ionizing radiation is an unavoidable risk in diagnostic radiology. Long-term monitoring of radiation dose to healthcare workers is essential for ensuring compliance with international safety standards and minimizing deterministic and stochastic health effects (ICRP, 2007; UNSCEAR, 2020).  Objective: To evaluate decennial trends (2015–2024) in occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic radiology personnel at Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University Teaching Hospital (ATBUTH), Bauchi, Nigeria, using thermoluminescent dosimetry.  Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted among 30 radiology personnel with uninterrupted thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) monitoring. Quarterly deep dose equivalent (Hₚ(10)) and shallow dose equivalent (Hₚ(0.07)) values were aggregated annually and analyzed descriptively. Observed doses were compared with International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) occupational dose limits.  Results: The mean annual effective dose (Hₚ(10)) was 2.00 ± 0.60 mSv, representing approximately 10% of the ICRP annual occupational limit. Radiographers recorded the highest exposure levels, followed by radiologists, while technicians had the lowest doses. Occasional quarterly elevations—particularly in shallow dose—were observed. Occupational radiation exposure among diagnostic radiology personnel at ATBUTH remained within internationally recommended limits over the ten-year period. However, episodic dose increases highlight the need for continuous optimization of radiation protection practices and sustained training programs.

Keywords : Occupational Radiation Exposure; Thermoluminescent Dosimetry; Diagnostic Radiology; Deep Dose; Shallow Dose; ALARA; Nigeria.

Paper Submission Last Date
28 - February - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe