⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



A Graded Risk Based Framework for Inspection Planning in Radiation Regulatory Authorities


Authors : Henry Lawluvi; Cyril Cyrus Arwui; Emmanuel Akrobortu; Nelson Agbemava; Etornam Ann Mensah; Sheilla Victoria Gbormitta

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mrxmrjwj

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2tb8uud3

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1299

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Radiation regulatory authorities supervise highly heterogeneous facilities and activities, yet inspection resources are finite and fixed inspection periodicity rarely reflects real differences in hazard, exposure pathways and compliance performance. This paper develops a graded risk based inspection framework that translates international safety requirements into a practical decision model for routine regulatory use. The study is a methodological framework paper based on documentary synthesis and design logic rather than on a primary empirical dataset. International safety standards, technical guidance, selected national regulatory manuals and methodological literature on semi quantitative risk tools were reviewed and converted into an operational model for inspection planning. The proposed framework separates inherent risk from managed risk and integrates five scored domains: hazard tier, exposure potential and operational complexity, compliance and event history, management system maturity, and source lifecycle or safety security flags. A conservative uncertainty uplift, documented override rules, stratified sampling and reactive inspection triggers are incorporated so that low scoring populations do not disappear from regulatory view and missing data do not falsely imply low risk. The main outputs are transparent risk bands linked to inspection frequency, inspection scope, inspector competence requirements and annual portfolio composition. The framework is intended for use by authorities with limited analytics capability as well as by regulators operating structured information systems such as RAIS+. Its main contribution is a reproducible and auditable method for converting a graded regulatory philosophy into an inspection programme that is proportionate, conservative under uncertainty and capable of continuous improvement.

Keywords : Risk Based Inspection; Graded Approach; Radiation Regulation; Compliance; Inspection Planning; Radiological Protection.

References :

  1. AERB (2014). Regulatory Inspection and Enforcement in Radiation Facilities, AERB/RF/SM/G 3. Mumbai: Atomic Energy Regulatory Board.
  2. ARPANSA (2023). Inspection Manual 2023. Yallambie: Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency.
  3. CNSC (2025). REGDOC 2.7.1, Radiation Protection, Version 1.1. Ottawa: Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.
  4. Cox, L. A. Jr. (2008). What's wrong with risk matrices? Risk Analysis, 28, 497 to 512.
  5. European Union (2013). Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation. Official Journal of the European Union, L13, 1 to 73.
  6. IAEA (2005). Categorization of Radioactive Sources, Safety Standards Series No. RS G 1.9. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  7. IAEA (2007). Inspection of Radiation Sources and Regulatory Enforcement, IAEA TECDOC 1526. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  8. IAEA (2014). Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards, General Safety Requirements Part 3. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  9. IAEA (2016a). Governmental, Legal and Regulatory Framework for Safety, General Safety Requirements Part 1 (Rev. 1). Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  10. IAEA (2016b). Leadership and Management for Safety, General Safety Requirements Part 2. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  11. IAEA (2018). Radiation Protection of the Public and the Environment, General Safety Guide No. GSG 8. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  12. IAEA (2021). Application of a Graded Approach in Regulating the Safety of Radiation Sources, IAEA TECDOC 1974. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
  13. IAEA (2022). Notification, Authorization, Inspection and Enforcement for the Safety and Security of Radiation Sources, Technical Reports Series No. 1002. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.

Radiation regulatory authorities supervise highly heterogeneous facilities and activities, yet inspection resources are finite and fixed inspection periodicity rarely reflects real differences in hazard, exposure pathways and compliance performance. This paper develops a graded risk based inspection framework that translates international safety requirements into a practical decision model for routine regulatory use. The study is a methodological framework paper based on documentary synthesis and design logic rather than on a primary empirical dataset. International safety standards, technical guidance, selected national regulatory manuals and methodological literature on semi quantitative risk tools were reviewed and converted into an operational model for inspection planning. The proposed framework separates inherent risk from managed risk and integrates five scored domains: hazard tier, exposure potential and operational complexity, compliance and event history, management system maturity, and source lifecycle or safety security flags. A conservative uncertainty uplift, documented override rules, stratified sampling and reactive inspection triggers are incorporated so that low scoring populations do not disappear from regulatory view and missing data do not falsely imply low risk. The main outputs are transparent risk bands linked to inspection frequency, inspection scope, inspector competence requirements and annual portfolio composition. The framework is intended for use by authorities with limited analytics capability as well as by regulators operating structured information systems such as RAIS+. Its main contribution is a reproducible and auditable method for converting a graded regulatory philosophy into an inspection programme that is proportionate, conservative under uncertainty and capable of continuous improvement.

Keywords : Risk Based Inspection; Graded Approach; Radiation Regulation; Compliance; Inspection Planning; Radiological Protection.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - May - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe