Authors : Jay Alfred

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mbe9fwh9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep228

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : We present a novel minimalistic physical framework in which all observable properties of spacetime, matter, and fundamental sector constants emerge from the evolution of two master variables in a multiverse landscape during dimensional descent: (A) the rotation speed of bubble universes, and (B) the vacuum energy density within each bubble universe. This provides a minimal, dynamical explanation for the emergence of classical universes from higher-dimensional sectors and pre-geometric origins. We humbly claim that this model dissolves, resolves or renders obsolete the mass hierarchy, measurement and measure problems, the Anthropic principle and the Fermi paradox. It explains the Dark Flow, Cold Spot, predicts chiral anomalies in gravitational waves and the CMB. It explains why CTC (closed timelike curves) will not violate causality in higher dimensional sectors in the local multiverse (and hence Hawking’s chronology protection is not required in these sectors). Starting from an 11-dimensional all-spatial Euclidean manifold, we show that conservation of angular momentum forces rotational speed to increase as nested bubble universes descend to lower-energy states. This rotation drives dimensional reduction, generates chirality and CP-offset universes, and converts one spatial dimension into a timelike dimension as it rotates towards the axis of rotation (this increases the speed of light and causal depth, while decreasing time dilation). Simultaneously, decreasing vacuum energy density (the second master variable) drives the evolution of all physical sector constants: Planck scales, fine-structure constant, Bohr radius, gravitational constant, and stabilizes the speed of light and time dilation, while entropy increases and mass scales shift downwards.

Keywords : Angular Momentum, Bohr Radius, Bubble Universe, Causality, Chirality, Classicality, CP-Reversal, Cold Spot, Dark Flow, Dimensional Descent, Entropy, Fine-Structure Constant, Fundamental Constants, Geometry, Gravitational Constant, Inflation, Inter-Dimensional Black Holes, Multiverse, Nested Bubble Universes, Parity Offset, Planck Scale, Quantum, Rotation, Spacetime, Speed of Light, Time, Time Dilation, Vacuum Energy Density.

References :

1. Randall, Lisa. The Boundaries of KKLT. arXiv:1912.06693v2 [hep-th] 2020.
2. Randall, L., and Sundrum, R. “A Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension.” Physical Review Letters 83 (1999): 3370. arXiv:hep-ph/9905221.
3. Randall, L., and Sundrum, R. “An Alternative to Compactification.” Physical Review Letters 83 (1999): 4690. arXiv:hep-th/9906064.
4. Arkani Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., and Dvali, G. “The Hierarchy Problem and New Dimensions at a Millimeter.” Physics Letters B 429 (1998): 263. arXiv:hep-ph/9803315.
5. Arkani Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., and Dvali, G. “Phenomenology, Astrophysics and Cosmology of Theories with Sub Millimeter Dimensions and TeV Scale Quantum Gravity.” Physical Review D 59 (1999): 086004. arXiv:hep-ph/9807344.
6. Appelquist, T., Chodos, A., and Freund, P. (eds.). Modern Kaluza–Klein Theories. Addison Wesley, 1987.
7. Duff, M. J., Nilsson, B. E. W., and Pope, C. N. “Kaluza–Klein Supergravity.” Physics Reports 130 (1986): 1.
8. Chodos, A., and Detweiler, S. “Where Has the Fifth Dimension Gone?” Physical Review D 21 (1980): 2167.
9. Appelquist, T., Cheng, H. C., and Dobrescu, B. A. “Bounds on Universal Extra Dimensions.” Physical Review D 64 (2001): 035002. arXiv:hep-ph/0012100.
10. Cheng, H. C., Matchev, K. T., and Schmaltz, M. “Radiative Corrections to Kaluza–Klein Masses.” Physical Review D 66 (2002): 036005. arXiv:hep-ph/0204342.
11. Dvali, G., Gabadadze, G., and Porrati, M. “4D Gravity on a Brane in 5D Minkowski Space.” Physics Letters B 485 (2000): 208. arXiv:hep-th/0005016.
12. Deffayet, C. “Cosmology on a Brane in Minkowski Bulk.” Physics Letters B 502 (2001): 199. arXiv:hep-th/0010186.
13. Maldacena, J. “The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity.” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2 (1998): 231. arXiv:hep-th/9711200.
14. Gubser, S. S., Klebanov, I. R., and Polyakov, A. M. “Gauge Theory Correlators from Non Critical String Theory.” Physics Letters B 428 (1998): 105. arXiv:hep-th/9802109.
15. Witten, E. “Anti de Sitter Space and Holography.” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2 (1998): 253. arXiv:hep-th/9802150.Alexander Vilenkin, Many Worlds in One (Hill & Wang, 2006), p. 181.
16. Alexander Vilenkin, Many Worlds in One (Hill & Wang, 2006), p. 181
17. A. Vilenkin, “The Beginning of the Universe,” American Scientist 95 (2007): 124–131.
18. A. Vilenkin, “Quantum Cosmology and Eternal Inflation,” in The Future of Theoretical Physics and Cosmology, Cambridge University Press (2003), pp. 649–666.
19. A. Vilenkin, “Creation of Universes from Nothing,” Physics Letters B 117 (1982): 25–28.
20. Borde, Arvind, Alan H. Guth, and Alexander Vilenkin. “Inflationary Spacetimes Are Not Past‑Complete.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 90, no. 15, 2003, p. 151301. arXiv:gr‑qc/0110012, 2001.
21. Arkani Hamed, P. Benincasa, A. Postnikov, Cosmological Polytopes and the Wavefunction of the Universe (2017). arXiv:1709.02813.
22. F. Wilczek, Quantum Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 160401 (2012).
23. Tegmark, Max. “The Mathematical Universe.” Foundations of Physics 38, 101–150 (2008). Witten, E. Anti de Sitter Space and Holography. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2, 253–291 (1998). arXiv:hep-th/9802150.
24. Ambjørn, Jan, Jerzy Jurkiewicz, and Renate Loll. “Spectral Dimension of the Universe.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 95, 2005, p. 171301.
25. Carlip, Steven. “Dimensional Reduction in Quantum Gravity.” International Journal of Modern Physics D, vol. 25, 2016, p. 1643003.
26. Hořava, Petr. “Spectral Dimension of the Universe in Quantum Gravity at a Lifshitz Point.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, 2009, p. 161301.
27. Lauscher, Oliver, and Martin Reuter. “Ultraviolet Fixed Point and Generalized Flow Equation of Quantum Gravity.” Physical Review D, vol. 65, 2001, p. 025013.
28. Feynman, Richard P., and Albert R. Hibbs. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. McGraw‑Hill, 1965.
29. Witten, E. Quantum Gravity in de Sitter Space. arXiv:hep-th/0106109 (2001).
30. Maldacena, J., Strominger, A., Witten, E. Black Hole Entropy in M-Theory. JHEP 12 (1997) 002. arXiv:hep-th/9711053.
31. C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity (2004).
32. Barbour, J. The End of Time. Oxford University Press (1999).
33. Barbour, J. Shape Dynamics. An Introduction. arXiv:1105.0183.
34. Barbour, J., Koslowski, T., Mercati, F. The Physical Origin of Time. arXiv:1409.0917.
35. Verlinde, E. “On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton.” JHEP 1104:029 (2011).
36. Van Raamsdonk, M. Building up Spacetime with Quantum Entanglement. Gen. Rel. Grav. 42, 2323–2329 (2010). arXiv:1005.3035.
37. Markopoulou, F. Space Does Not Exist, So Time Can. arXiv:0909.1861. (Time emerges from quantum causal networks.)
38. Lloyd, S. The Universe as Quantum Computer. Nature 406, 1047–1054 (2000). (Spacetime as emergent computation.)
39. J. W. Moffat, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2, 351 (1993).
40. A. Albrecht and J. Magueijo, Phys. Rev. D 59, 043516 (1999).
41. J. D. Barrow, Phys. Rev. D 59, 043515 (1999).
42. JETP Letters (Volovik), (25 May 2025).
43. Aguirre–Carroll–Johnson. arXiv:1108.0417, (2011). JCAP (2012).
44. Chakraborty et al. 2024 review.
45. R. Penrose, The Emperor’s New Mind (1989).
46. R. Penrose, The Road to Reality (2004).
47. E. A. Uehling, Phys. Rev. 48, 55 (1935).
48. M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory (1995).
49. C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 124, 925 (1961).
50. Heisenberg, W. & Euler, H. (1936) Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons. Z. Phys. 98, 714 (1936).
51. Schwinger, J. (1951) On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization. Phys. Rev. 82, 664 (1951).
52. Dittrich, W. & Gies, H. (2000) Probing the Quantum Vacuum. Springer, 2000. (Standard reference for vacuum as a polarizable medium.)
53. Marklund, M. & Shukla, P. K. (2006) Nonlinear collective effects in photon–photon and photon–plasma interactions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 591 (2006).
54. Parker, L. & Toms, D. (2009) Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime. Cambridge University Press, 2009. (Vacuum polarization in curved backgrounds / high vacuum energy regimes.)
55. Mottola, E. (1985) Particle creation in de Sitter space. Phys. Rev. D 31, 754 (1985). (High ρ_"vac"  enhances fluctuations.)
56. G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738 (1977).
57. Aaij, R., et al. “Test of Lepton Universality Using B⁺ → K⁺ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ Decays.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 113, no. 15, 2014, p. 151601.
58. Aaij, R., et al. “Measurement of the Ratio of Branching Fractions B⁰ → K⁰μ⁺μ⁻ and B⁰ → K⁰e⁺e⁻.” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2017, no. 8, 2017, p. 55.
59. Aaij, R., et al. “Search for Lepton Universality Violation in B⁺ → K⁺ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ Decays.” Nature Physics, vol. 18, 2022, pp. 277–282.
60. Lees, J. P., et al. (BaBar Collaboration). “Measurement of Branching Fractions and Rate Asymmetries in the Rare Decays B → Kℓ⁺ℓ⁻.” Physical Review D, vol. 86, no. 3, 2012, p. 032012.
61. Huschle, M., et al. (Belle Collaboration). “Measurement of the Branching Ratio of B̄ → Dτ⁻ν̄τ Relative to B̄ → Dℓ⁻ν̄ℓ Decays.” Physical Review D, vol. 92, no. 7, 2015, p. 072014.
62. Abdesselam, A., et al. (Belle Collaboration). “Test of Lepton Flavor Universality in B → Kℓ⁺ℓ⁻ Decays at Belle.” arXiv:1904.02440, 2019.
63. Altmannshofer, Wolfgang, and David M. Straub. “New Physics in B → Kμ⁺μ⁻?” European Physical Journal C, vol. 73, no. 12, 2013, p. 2646.
64. Capdevila, Bernat, et al. “Patterns of New Physics in b → sℓ⁺ℓ⁻ Transitions in the Light of Recent Data.” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2018, no. 1, 2018, p. 93.
65. Geng, Li Sheng, et al. “Global Fit to b → sℓ⁺ℓ⁻ Anomalies.” Physics Letters B, vol. 815, 2021, p. 136146.
66. Crivellin, Andreas, et al. “Lepton Flavor Non Universality in B Decays from Dynamical Yukawa Couplings.” Physical Review D, vol. 99, no. 3, 2019, p. 035004.
67. London, David, and Joaquim Matias. “Flavour Anomalies: A Review.” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 72, 2022, pp. 37–68.
68. Bifani, Simone, et al. “Review of Lepton Universality Tests in B Decays.” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 46, no. 2, 2019, p. 023001.
69. Albrecht, Johannes, et al. “Flavour Physics and CP Violation.” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 1, 2019, pp. 238–252.
70. Glashow, Sheldon L., et al. “Lepton Flavor Violation in B Decays.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 114, no. 9, 2015, p. 091801.
71. Isidori, Gino, et al. “Flavour Physics and the Quest for New Physics.” European Physical Journal C, vol. 77, no. 12, 2017, p. 792
72. Einstein, Albert. Relativity: The Special and the General Theory. Methuen, 1916.
73. Wheeler, John Archibald. “The ‘Past’ and the ‘Delayed Choice’ Double Slit Experiment.” In Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, edited by A.R. Marlow, Academic Press, 1978.
74. Wheeler, John Archibald. “Law Without Law.” In Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J.A. Wheeler and W.H. Zurek, Princeton UP, 1983.
75. Kim, Yoon Hak, et al. “A Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 1, 2000, pp. 1–5.
76. Walborn, S. P., et al. “Double Slit Quantum Eraser.” Physical Review A, vol. 65, 2002, 033818.
77. Scully, Marlan O., and Kai Drühl. “Quantum Eraser: A Proposed Photon Correlation Experiment Concerning Observation and ‘Delayed Choice’ in Quantum Mechanics.” Physical Review A, vol. 25, no. 4, 1982, pp. 2208–2213.
78. Ma, Xiao Song, et al. “Quantum Erasure with Causally Disconnected Choice.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, no. 4, 2013, pp. 1221–1226.
79. Castro Ruiz, Esteban, et al. “Time as a Quantum Observable.” Physical Review X, vol. 10, 2020, 011047.
80. Hodgson, Thomas, et al. “Time and Quantum Clocks: A Review of Recent Developments.” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 85, no. 11, 2022, 116001.
81. Alonso Serrano, Ana, et al. “Emergent Time and Time Travel in Quantum Physics.” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 41, no. 3, 2024, 035001.
82. Price, Huw. Time’s Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford UP, 1996.
83. Leifer, Matthew S., and Matthew F. Pusey. “Is a Time Symmetric Interpretation of Quantum Theory Possible Without Retrocausality?” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 473, 2017, 20160607.
84. Aharonov, Yakir, et al. “Two State Vector Formalism: An Updated Review.” In Time in Quantum Mechanics, edited by J.G. Muga et al., Springer, 2008.
85. Lutz, Eric, and Sandu Popescu. “The Two Arrows of Time in Quantum Thermodynamics.” Nature Physics, vol. 16, 2020, pp. 121–125.
86. Zych, Magdalena, and Časlav Brukner. “Quantum Form of the Equivalence Principle.” Nature Physics, vol. 14, 2018, pp. 1027–1031.
87. Jennings, David, and Terry Rudolph. “Entanglement and the Thermodynamic Arrow of Time.” Physical Review E, vol. 81, 2010, 061130.
88. Micadei, K., et al. “Reversing the Thermodynamic Arrow of Time Using Quantum Correlations.” Nature Communications, vol. 10, 2019, 2456.
89. Riedel, C. Jess. “Classical Branching and the Emergence of Time’s Arrow.” Foundations of Physics, vol. 51, 2021, 94.
90. Proietti, Massimiliano, et al. “Experimental Test of Local Observer Independence.” Science Advances, vol. 5, no. 9, 2019, eaaw9832.
91. Aspect, Alain, et al. “Experimental Tests of Bell’s Inequalities Using Time Varying Analyzers.” Physical Review Letters, vol. 49, 1982, pp. 1804–1807.