A New Era of Tooth Preparation and Gingitage Retraction Technique: A Case Report


Authors : Dr Diksha Verma; Dr Sunil Kumar M.V; Dr Rajesh Kumar; Dr Krishan Kumar; Dr Simran Utwal

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/yufnwazj

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/42mks5we

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT228

PlumX Metrics

Semantic Scholar

ResearchGate

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The demand for procedures intended to improve dental aesthetics has increased recently. Preserving the teeth and surrounding soft structures to the greatest extent possible is preferred in this situation by both patients and dentists. When using fixed prostheses, maintaining the stability and health of soft tissues is a constant struggle. Bone tissue health and soft tissue health are directly correlated. The long-term efficacy of prosthetic therapy thus depends on preserving tissue health and being free of mucositis. This case report describes the successful application of the gingitage technique in a patient requiring aesthetic enhancement of the gingival margins surrounding dental restorations. The patient presented with uneven gingival contours and mild inflammation around subgingival margins of existing restorations, compromising both function and aesthetics. Results demonstrated significant improvements in gingival health, a more balanced gingival margin, and an enhanced aesthetic outcome. Follow-up assessments revealed stable gingival contours and an overall increase in patient satisfaction. This case report underscores the effectiveness of the gingitage technique as a minimally invasive solution for enhancing soft tissue aesthetics and supporting the longevity of dental restorations.

Keywords : Gingitage, Gingival Recession, Periodontal Health, Oral Hygiene.

References :

  1. Prasanna GR, Reddy K, Kumar RN, Shivaprakash S. Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials on Gingival Sulcus Width. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2013;14(2):217–21.
  2. Afaf Al-Haddad, Noor, Yee A, Kohli S. Biological Oriented Preparation Technique (BOPT) for tooth preparation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Saudi Dental Journal 2023 Oct 1;36(1).
  3. S S, Ma VS, Mi VS, F HG, M H. Gingival Retraction Methods for Fabrication of Fixed Partial Denture: Literature Review. Journal of dental biomaterials 2016;3(2):205–13.
  4. Neha Nandal, Budhiraja D, Sehrawat M, S Bharathesh, Nasir Ul Sadiq, Sharma D. A literature review on techniques of gingival retraction. IP Annals of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2015; 7(3):128–30.
  5. Kamansky FW, Tempel TR, Post AC. Gingival tissue response to rotary curettage. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1984 Sep 1;52(3):380–3.
  6. Ingraham. Rotary gingival curettage--a technique for tooth preparation and management of the gingival sulcus for impression taking. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry 2024;1(4).
  7. Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ, Jekki R, Won J. Gingival Displacement for Impression Making in Fixed Prosthodontics. Dental Clinics of North America. 2014 Jan;58(1):45–68.
  8. Moskow, B. S.: The response of gingival sulcus to instrumentation: a histological investigation of gingival curettage. J Periodontol 35: 112, 1964.
  9. La Forgia, A.: Cordless tissue retraction for impressions for fixed prosthesis. J PROSTHET DENT 17:379, 1967.
  10. Benjamin, S. D., and Colman, H. I.: Periodontal considerations in gingival retraction procedures. J South Calif Dent Assoc 38:823, 1970.
  11. Scrivner, E. I.: Gingival tissue management during fixed prosthodontic procedures. Dent Clin North Am 15:587, 1971.
  12. Woychesin, F. F.: An evaluation of the drugs used for gingival retraction. J PROSTHET DENT 14:769, 1964.
  13. Nemetz, H.: Tissue management in fixed prosthodontics. J PROSTHET DENT 31:628. 1974.
  14. Anneroth, G., and Nordenram, A.: Reaction of the gingiva to the application of threads in the gingival pocket for taking impressions with elastic material. Oral Res 3:301, 1969.
  15. Strock. M. S.: The rationale for electrosurgery. Oral Surg 5:1166, 1952.
  16. Klug, R. G.: Gingival tissue regeneration following electrical retraction. J PROSTHET DENT 16:955, 1966.
  17. Malone, W. F., and Manning, J. K.: Electrosurgery in restorative dentistry. J PROSWET DENT 20:417, 1968.
  18. Podshadley, A., and Lundeen, H.: Electrosurgical procedures in crown and bridge restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 77:1321, 1968.
  19. Loe, H.: The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 38:610, 1967.
  20. Hirschfeld L. Subgingival curettage in periodontal treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1952;44:301.
  21. Ainslie P, Caffesse RG. A biometric evaluation of gingival curettage. Quintessence Int 1981;5:519.
  22. Echeverria JJ, Caffesse RG. Effects of gingival curettage when performed one month after root instrumentation. A biometric evaluation. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10:277-286.
  23. Nadler H. Removal of crevicular epithelium by ultrasonic curettes. J Periodontol 1962;33:220.
  24. Sanderson A. Gingival curettage by hand and ultrasonic instruments: A histologic comparison. J Periodontol 1966;37:279.

The demand for procedures intended to improve dental aesthetics has increased recently. Preserving the teeth and surrounding soft structures to the greatest extent possible is preferred in this situation by both patients and dentists. When using fixed prostheses, maintaining the stability and health of soft tissues is a constant struggle. Bone tissue health and soft tissue health are directly correlated. The long-term efficacy of prosthetic therapy thus depends on preserving tissue health and being free of mucositis. This case report describes the successful application of the gingitage technique in a patient requiring aesthetic enhancement of the gingival margins surrounding dental restorations. The patient presented with uneven gingival contours and mild inflammation around subgingival margins of existing restorations, compromising both function and aesthetics. Results demonstrated significant improvements in gingival health, a more balanced gingival margin, and an enhanced aesthetic outcome. Follow-up assessments revealed stable gingival contours and an overall increase in patient satisfaction. This case report underscores the effectiveness of the gingitage technique as a minimally invasive solution for enhancing soft tissue aesthetics and supporting the longevity of dental restorations.

Keywords : Gingitage, Gingival Recession, Periodontal Health, Oral Hygiene.

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe