Authors :
Mizwar Latjengke; Anton Kaharu; Mohammad Yusuf Tuloli
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/bdse3xkp
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/58b8nsze
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun2054
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Determining public transportation fares in Indonesia often triggers conflict between operators, users, and the
government due to a lack of synthesized national benchmarks. This study aims to establish a comprehensive national
synthesis of public transportation fares by integrating three critical parameters: Vehicle Operating Costs (VOC), Ability to
Pay (ATP), and Willingness to Pay (WTP). Utilizing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and quantitative meta-synthesis
approach guided by the PRISMA 2020 statement, 20 eligible empirical studies across various regions in Indonesia were
analyzed after undergoing rigorous quality appraisal. The meta-synthesis reveals a distinct structural pattern in the national
public transport pricing ecosystem, where the average values are formulated as VOC < ATP > WTP < Actual Fare.
Specifically, the synthesized national averages are IDR 11,353/km for VOC, IDR 14,680 for ATP, IDR 13,370 for WTP, and
IDR 22,686 for the Actual Fare. This pattern exposes a systemic gap: while the public's financial capacity (ATP) is
theoretically sufficient to cover operating costs, their actual willingness to pay (WTP) remains low, yet the actual fares
charged in the field significantly exceed both thresholds. This study concludes that the current tariff structure imposes an
inequitable cost burden on passengers. The findings provide an evidence-based framework for policymakers to design
targeted subsidy schemes and service-quality improvements to bridge the tariff-affordability gap.
Keywords :
Public Transportation; Fare Synthesis; Vehicle Operating Cost (VOC); Ability to Pay (ATP); Willingness to Pay (WTP); Systematic Literature Review.
References :
- A. Wicaksono and L. Djakfar, Sistem Transportasi Perkotaan Berkelanjutan. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2018.
- A. A. Alamsyah and D. Rahmawati, "Analisis kemampuan (Ability to Pay) dan kemauan (Willingness to Pay) masyarakat terhadap tarif angkutan kota di wilayah koridor utama," Jurnal Transportasi dan Perencanaan Wilayah, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 145–156, 2021.
- R. Y. Pratama and I. G. Wijaya, "Analisis tarif angkutan umum berdasarkan preferensi pengguna (Willingness to Pay) dan load factor armada mikrolet," Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil dan Transportasi, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 210–222, 2019.
- M. Zain and H. Kusuma, "Analisis disparitas geografis terhadap komponen pembentuk Biaya Operasional Kendaraan (BOK) angkutan umum darat di wilayah luar Jawa," Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 101–111, 2019.
- M. T. Nugroho and B. Suprianto, "Evaluasi biaya operasional kendaraan (BOK) dan penentuan batas tarif ideal bus antarkota dalam provinsi," Jurnal Infrastruktur Teknik Sipil, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2020.
- M. J. Page et al., "The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews," BMJ, vol. 372, no. n71, pp. 1–9, 2021.
- S. Suharto, T. B. Joewono, and W. Santosa, "Paratransit sustainability in Indonesian cities: The case of Angkutan Kota (Angkot)," Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 25, pp. 3409–3422, 2017.
- T. Sudarsono and A. Wibowo, "Evaluasi efisiensi skema subsidi Buy The Service (BTS) pada sistem angkutan massal perkotaan," Jurnal Kebijakan Transportasi Indonesia, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 177–188, 2021.
- R. V. Vukan, Urban Transit: Operations, Planning, and Economics. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
- Badan Pusat Statistik, Statistik Transportasi Darat Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: BPS RI, 2023.
- F. Ramadhan and N. Hidayat, "Meta-sintesis kuantitatif disparitas tarif dan kualitas pelayanan Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) di kota-kota besar Indonesia," Jurnal Transportasi Berkelanjutan, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 89–101, 2023.
- T. Litman, Evaluating Transportation Affordability. Victoria: Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 2023.
- K. Button, Transport Economics, 4th ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.
- O. Z. Tamin, Perencanaan dan Pemodelan Transportasi. Bandung: Penerbit ITB, 2000.
- Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor PM 11 Tahun 2019 tentang Tata Cara Penetapan Tarif Angkutan Orang dengan Kendaraan Bermotor Umum dalam Trayek. Jakarta: Kemenhub RI, 2019.
- H. Purnomo and A. Setiawan, "Kesenjangan pendapatan dan alokasi pengeluaran transportasi darat pada masyarakat perkotaan di Indonesia," Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Publik, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55–68, 2022.
- B. Santoso and H. Handayani, "Analisis komparasi tarif angkutan umum berbasis trayek tetap dan moda transportasi online berdasarkan parameter WTP," Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2020.
Determining public transportation fares in Indonesia often triggers conflict between operators, users, and the
government due to a lack of synthesized national benchmarks. This study aims to establish a comprehensive national
synthesis of public transportation fares by integrating three critical parameters: Vehicle Operating Costs (VOC), Ability to
Pay (ATP), and Willingness to Pay (WTP). Utilizing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and quantitative meta-synthesis
approach guided by the PRISMA 2020 statement, 20 eligible empirical studies across various regions in Indonesia were
analyzed after undergoing rigorous quality appraisal. The meta-synthesis reveals a distinct structural pattern in the national
public transport pricing ecosystem, where the average values are formulated as VOC < ATP > WTP < Actual Fare.
Specifically, the synthesized national averages are IDR 11,353/km for VOC, IDR 14,680 for ATP, IDR 13,370 for WTP, and
IDR 22,686 for the Actual Fare. This pattern exposes a systemic gap: while the public's financial capacity (ATP) is
theoretically sufficient to cover operating costs, their actual willingness to pay (WTP) remains low, yet the actual fares
charged in the field significantly exceed both thresholds. This study concludes that the current tariff structure imposes an
inequitable cost burden on passengers. The findings provide an evidence-based framework for policymakers to design
targeted subsidy schemes and service-quality improvements to bridge the tariff-affordability gap.
Keywords :
Public Transportation; Fare Synthesis; Vehicle Operating Cost (VOC); Ability to Pay (ATP); Willingness to Pay (WTP); Systematic Literature Review.