Authors : Jude IwedikeOpuh; Henry Peter Ovili; Daniel Ukpenusiowho; Samuel Chukwuemeka Nwachokor; Ijeoma Edith Oshiokpu; Kenneth Obokparo Orugba

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3ayy5x9x

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mmx7wuj7

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1882

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study reflects on the salient properties as well as advancement of quantum technologies which has tremendously impacted the cryptography solution that were visibly limited in classical cryptography. Quantum computing properties encompasses namely Superposition, Entanglement, Interference, Teleportation, Cryptography etc. Quantum computing provides numerous algorithms such as QKD, BB84, B91 and more that can offer secure communication in comparison to classical cryptography in high security arrangement that entail key exchange by utilizing quantum principles to identify menace in a system. However, this study not minding challenges like environmental noise output, notable transmission errors as well as limited communication distances that inhibits its practical scalability, guarantees usefulness of incorporating various properties in quantum computing to solve challenges in a real world. Quantum computing has impacted meaningfully in areas such as financial institutions, blockchain technology, drugs as well as MRI etc. Our result in this study suggested that properties properties such as entanglement, teleportation when accurately measured can be incorporated with superposition as well as cryptography in guaranteeing instant, secured and timely election result.

Keywords : Quantum Key Distribution, Cryptography, Superposition, Entanglement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

References :

1. Abidin Shafiqul, “Quantum cryptography technique: A way to improve security challenges in mobile cloud computing (MCC)”, Materials Today: Proceedings, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.593.
2. Arun, G & Mishra Vivekan and, A Review on Quantum Computing and Communication, IEEE, 2014
3. Bateman J., “A Robust Method for the Creation of Equal Super positions in Rubidium: A pulse scheme for the Momentum State Quantum Computer”, IEEE, 2005.
4. C. Noh and D. G. Angelakis, “Quantum simulations and many-body physics
   with light,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016401 (2017).
5. Carleo, G., E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G., “Quantum simulators: Architectures
   and opportunities,” PRX Quantum 2, 017003 (2021).
6. Chen Jiajun, „ Review on Quantum Communication and Quantum Computation‟, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 10.1088/1742- 6596/1865/2/02200
7. Daley, A. (2023). Twenty-fve years of analogue quantum simulation. Nat. Rev. Phys. 5(12), 702–703 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-023-00666-0
8. De Leon, N. K.M. Itoh, D. Kim and D.W. Steuerman (2021), Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.ABB2823
9. DiVincenzo, D (1998).Quantum information is physical. Superlattices Microstruct. 23(3), 419–432 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1006/spmi.1997.0520
10. Dykman, M., P. M. Platzman, P. Seddighrad (2003), Qubits with electrons on liquid helium. Phys. Rev. B 67(15), 155402 (2003). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.67.155402
11. Fernandez-Carames,T.,  P. Fraga-Lamas, Towards post-quantum blockchain: a review on blockchain cryptography resistant to quantum computing attacks. IEEE Access 8, 21091–21116 (2020). https://doi.org/ 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968985
12. Georgescu. I (2020), The DiVincenzo criteria 20 years on. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2(12), 666–666 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00256-4
13. Gill, S A. Kumar, H. Singh, M. Singh & R. Buyya (2022), Quantum computing: a taxonomy, systematic review and future directions. Softw. Pract. Exp. 52(1), 66–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe. 3039
14. Gisin, N, G. Ribordy, W. Tittel, and H. Zbinden,(2002). Quantum cryptography," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 145-195.
15. Griffiths,G  and D. F. Schroeter, Introduction to quantum mechanics. , 2018.
16. Gyongyosi Laszlo and Imre Sandor, Entanglement access control for the quantum Internet, Quantum Information Processing, 2019.
17. Gyongyosi, L & S. Imre (2019), A survey on quantum computing technology. Comput. Sci. Rev. 31, 51–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COSREV. 2018.11.002
18. Hamdoun Hala and Sagheer Alaa, “Information security through controlled quantum teleportation networks”, Digital Communications and Networks, 2020.
19. Hellenbrand, M. J. MacManus-Driscoll (2023). Multi-level resistive switching inhafnium-oxide-based devices for neuromorphic computing. Nano Convergence 10, 44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/S40580-023-00392-4
20. Junggren, l Daniel, Entanglement in quantum communication, Doctoral Thesis Stockholm, Sweden 2006
21. Karthikeyan,B and N Guruprasath (2025). Distributed Quantum Communication Channel via QuantumTeleportation, International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6, (2), and Page – 3539-3544.
22. Kaur, N., Singh, A., and Singh, S. (2011). Enhancement of Network Security Techniques Using Quantum Cryptography. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering, Vol. 3, Issue 5, pp.1960-1964 (2011)
23. Krinner, S., N. Lacroix, A. Remm,, C. & A. Wallraf, Realizing repeated quantum error correction in a distance-three surface code. Nature 605(7911), 669–674 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04566-8
24. Li et al L L, Li J, Chang Y. Quantum key distribution based on single-particle and EPR entanglement. Sci China Inf Sci, 2020, 63(6): 169501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-018-9851-6
25. Lloyd, S, (1994).Necessary and sufcient conditions for quantum computation. J. Mod. Opt. 41(12), 2503–2520 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500 349414552341
26. M. Xiongfeng, “Quantum cryptography: from theory to practice” Doctor of Philosophy Thesis Graduate Department of Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 2008.
27. Mark, D.,  H.Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F.G. Brandão, S. Choi, M. Endres, Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos. Nature 613(7944), 468–473 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-05442-1
28. Motta,M, & J.E. Rice, Emerging quantum computing algorithms for quantum chemistry. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. 12(3), e1580 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/WCMS.1580
29. Nielsen, M & I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, 10th edn. (Cambridge University Press, 2011)
30. Niu, J., L. Zhang, Y. Liu, J. Qiu and D. Yu (2023). Low-loss interconnects for modular superconducting quantum processors. Nat. Electr. 6(3), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41928-023-00925-z
31. Perdomo-Ortiz, A., M. Benedetti, J. Realpe-Gómez, R. Biswas, Opportunities and challenges for quantum-assisted machine learning in nearterm quantum computers. Quant. Sci. Technol. 3(3), 030502 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/AAB859
32. Qi, W. Zhu, L. Qian, (2010). “Feasibility of quantum key distribution through a dense wavelength division multiplexing network,” New J. Phys. 12, 103042.
33. Rina and Rohtas, G. (2023). Quantum Computing: Recent trend in Computing. International Journal of Breative Research Thoughts (IJCRT) 11(1), 2320-2882.
34. Sevilla, J & C. J. Riedel. Forecasting timelines of quantum computing.arXiv:2009.05045 (2020)
35. Shemin P and Vipinkumar K, “E-PAYMENT SYSTEM USING VISUAL AND QUANTUM
    CRYPTOGRAPHY”, ICETEST, 2015.
36. Shi, Y., Y. Liu, Y.R. Zhang, Z. Xiang & H. Fan (2023), Quantum simulation of topological zero modes on a 41-qubit superconducting processor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(8), 080401. https://
    doi.org/10.1103/PHYSREVLETT.131.080401
37. Thomas J, G. S. Kanter, and P. Kumar, “Designing noise-robust quantum networks coexisting in the classical fiber infrastructure, 31, 43035–43047 (2023).
38. Tittel, W., H. Zbinden, and N. Gisin, "Experimental demonstration of quantum
    secret sharing," Physical Review A, vol. 63, no. 4, p. 042301, 2001.
39. Wang, J., F. Sciarrino, A. Laing, M.G. Thompson, Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photonics 14(5), 273–284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0532-1
40. Weinstein, J., M.D. Reed, A.M. Jones, R.W. Andrews & M.G. Borselli (2023). Universal logic with encoded spin qubits in silicon. Nature 615(7954), 817–822 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05777-3. arXiv: 2202.03605
41. Younes A., “Enhancing the security of quantum communication by hiding the message in a superposition”, Information Sciences, 2010.
42. Zhong,H.,  H. Wang, Y.H. Deng, & J.W. Pan, Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science 370(6523), 1460–1463(2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8770
43. Zou Nanxi, “Quantum Entanglement and Its Application in Quantum Communication”, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021.