Authors :
Alhaji Mohamed Seraj Jalloh; Rukayat Akingbade; Joy Onma Enyejo
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/yc3cravm
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3hy5s9xb
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar1121
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Infrastructure projects involve large capital expenditures, extended timelines, and exposure to numerous
uncertainties including cost escalation, schedule delays, and fluctuating financial risks. Conventional financial monitoring
approaches in project accounting rely heavily on deterministic variance analysis techniques such as Cost Variance (CV),
Schedule Variance (SV), and Earned Value Management (EVM). While these methods provide useful retrospective
indicators, they often fail to capture dynamic financial risk exposure and probabilistic cost deviations inherent in complex
infrastructure programs. This study proposes a novel Risk-Adjusted Capital Monitoring Algorithm (RACMA) designed to
enhance financial oversight in infrastructure project accounts through probabilistic risk modeling and adaptive capital
monitoring. RACMA integrates stochastic capital flow modeling, Bayesian risk weighting, and Monte Carlo–driven cost
uncertainty simulation to produce a Risk-Adjusted Capital Performance Index (RCPI) that dynamically evaluates project
financial health. The algorithm incorporates machine-assisted anomaly detection using Gradient Boosted Regression Trees
and probabilistic schedule-cost coupling models to identify emerging capital deviations earlier than traditional monitoring
approaches. The proposed framework is evaluated using simulated infrastructure project financial datasets representing
transportation, energy, and water infrastructure investments. RACMA is compared against traditional financial monitoring
techniques including Earned Value Management (EVM), Standard Variance Analysis (SVA), Forecast-based Budget Control
and Hybrid model. Performance evaluation metrics include prediction accuracy of cost overruns, early risk detection
capability, and capital utilization efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that RACMA improves cost overrun
prediction accuracy by approximately 28–35%, detects financial risk conditions 3–5 reporting cycles earlier, and reduces
monitoring error margins compared with deterministic variance analysis frameworks. Graphical analyses illustrate
comparative performance trends, including RCPI trajectory plots, risk-adjusted capital deviation curves, and predictive
error distributions. The findings show that integrating probabilistic financial modeling with algorithmic risk adjustment
provides a more reliable decision-support mechanism for infrastructure project finance management. The proposed
algorithm therefore represents a significant advancement in capital monitoring methodologies, offering project managers
and financial controllers a proactive analytical tool for risk-sensitive financial oversight in large-scale infrastructure
programs.
Keywords :
Risk-Adjusted Capital Monitoring Algorithm (RACMA); Infrastructure Project Accounting; Variance Analysis Techniques; Capital Risk Modeling; Infrastructure Financial Analytics.
References :
- Adewale, L.D. (2025). Applying Supply Chain 4.0 to Vertical Supply Chain Integration: A Key to Revitalizing US Automotive Manufacturing Sector. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0225.0940
- Adewale, L.D. (2025). Lifecycle Assessment and Circular Economy Strategies for Sustainable Automotive Materials: Optimizing Recycling, Waste Reduction, and Cost Efficiency. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0225.0953
- Adewale, L.D. (2026). Digital Evidence Chains for PPAP Assurance: AR-Guided Data Capture, AI-Verified Documentation, and Continuous Audit Automation for Secure Multi-Tier Supplier Traceability in Industry 4.0 Manufacturing. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Futuristic Development, 7(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMER.2026.7.1.43-55
- Adewale, L.D. (2026). Smart Factories, Smarter Evidence: Reinventing Quality Assurance for U.S. Manufacturing Competitiveness. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Futuristic Development, 7(1), 09–18. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJMFD.2026.7.1.09-18
- Akorli, K. Y., & Enyejo, J. O. (2025). AI Powered Retail Pricing Transparency Effects on Consumer Trust and Purchase Intentions in US Algorithmic Pricing Systems. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 4(10), 261–279. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v4i10.1289
- Animasaun, J. B., Ijiga, O. M., Ayoola, V. B., & Enyejo, L. A. (2024). Evaluating the Stability of Cannabinoid Extracts Following Different Solvent Evaporation Conditions: A GC-MS/LC-MS Degradation Profiling Study. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 3(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v3i1.1161
- Anokwuru, E. A., & Igba, E. (2025). AI-Driven Field Enablement Systems for Oncology Commercial Strategy: A Framework for Enhancing Decision-Making and Market Execution. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 4(2), 118–135. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v4i2.1011
- Armah, G. D., Idoko, P. I., Adeyeye, Y. I., Enyejo, L. A., & Azonuche, T. I. (2024). Quantifying The Economic Spillover Effects of Healthcare Data Breaches Using Panel Regression. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 11(12), 631–656. https://www.ejpmr.com/home/abstract_id/14810
- Awolola, O. J., Azonuche, T. I., Enyejo, J. O., Ononiwu, M., & Ayoola, V. B. (2026). Innovation-Led Construction Management Strategies for Improving Procurement, Contractor Coordination, and Regulatory Compliance in Emerging Economies. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 11(1), 2853-2868. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan1454
- Bauskar, S., Madhavram, C., & Galla, E. P. (2024). Predictive analytics for project risk management using machine learning.
- Canesi, R., Gabrielli, L., Marella, G., & Ruggeri, A. G. (2025). Probabilistic risk assessment framework for cost overruns predictions in infrastructure projects using randomized simulations. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 40(27), 4774-4796.
- Dankwah, H. A. K., & Enyejo, J. O. (2025). Real-time revenue assurance for subscription and usage-based billing using accounting-led anomaly detection across order-to-cash event streams in the United States. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 7(11), 636–660. https://doi.org/10.51594/farj.v7i11.2215
- Elsaid, M., Nassar, K., Alqahtani, F. K., & Abotaleb, I. (2025). Comparative analysis of earned value management techniques in construction projects. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 23606.
- EM, Admin., (2022). How Does Machine Learning Help in Data Analytics? https://www.eminenture.com/blog/how-does-machine-learning-help-in-data-analytics/
- Gupta, Y. P. (2025). Probabilistic approaches in the analysis of financial risk and uncertainty associated with capital project contracts (Doctoral dissertation). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.102308
- Ijiga, O. M., Ifenatuora, G. P., & Olateju, M. (2023). STEM-Driven Public Health Literacy: Using Data Visualization and Analytics to Improve Disease Awareness in Secondary Schools. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science and Technology, 10(4), 773–793. https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRST2221189
- Ijiga, O. M., Okika, N., Balogun, S. A., Enyejo, L. A., & Agbo, O. J. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Federated Learning Architectures for Insider Threat Detection in Distributed SQL-Based Enterprise Environments. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10(7), 245-258. ISSN No: 2456-2165
- Li, W., & Yu, J. (2017). A study on the shortcomings of variance analysis in cost control of construction projects. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(2), 134-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.06.003
- Liang, Y., Ashuri, B., & Sun, W. (2020). Analysis of the variability of project cost and schedule performance in the design-build environment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 146(6), 04020060.
- Mayo-Alvarez, L., Alvarez-Risco, A., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., Sekar, M. C., & Yáñez, J. A. (2022). A systematic review of earned value management methods for monitoring and control of project schedule performance: An AHP approach. Sustainability, 14(22), 15259.
- Nahid, O. F., Rahmatullah, R., Al-Arafat, M., Enamul Kabir, M., & Dasgupta, A. (2024). Risk mitigation strategies in large scale infrastructure project: A project management perspective.
- Nortey, M., Enyejo, J. O., & Ayoola, V. B. (2025). Applying Business Analytics to Improve Resource Allocation Efficiency in Government-Led Agricultural Marketing Campaigns Across MultiRegional Markets. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 4(10), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v4i10.1270
- Olajide, J. O., Otokiti, B. O., Nwani, S., Ogunmokun, A. S., Adekunle, B. I., & Fiemotongha, J. E. (2023). Real-Time Financial Variance Analysis Models for Procurement and Material Cost Monitoring. Gyanshauryam, International Scientific Refereed Research Journal, 6(5), 115-125.
- Onwuzurike, M. A., & Raphael, F. O. (2025). Ethical Governance Models for Artificial Intelligence Deployment in K–12 Education: Balancing Algorithmic Personalization, Accountability, and Child Protection Policy. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology, 4(8), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijsrmt.v4i8.1271
- Shiferaw, A. (2022). Assessment of the Practices and Challenges of Implementing Earned Value Management System in Selected Ethiopian Megaprojects (Doctoral dissertation, ST. MARY’S UNIVERSITY).
- Tayefeh Hashemi, S., Ebadati, O. M., & Kaur, H. (2020). Cost estimation and prediction in construction projects: A systematic review on machine learning techniques. SN Applied Sciences, 2(10), 1703.
- Tom-Ayegunle, K, Jamil, Y, Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. et al (2025). Cumulative Burden of Geriatric Conditions and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Older Adults: Analysis From ARIC. JACC Adv. 2025 Dec, 4 (12_Part_1).
- Uzzaman, A., Kudapa, S. P., & Nijhum, A. M. (2021). Predictive Analytics for Improving Financial Forecasting and Risk Management in US Capital Markets. American Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(04), 69-100.
- Wang, D., Chen, J., Zhao, D., Dai, F., Zheng, C., & Wu, X. (2017). Monitoring workers' attention and vigilance in construction activities through a wireless and wearable electroencephalography system. Automation in construction, 82, 122-137.
- You, J., Chen, Y., Wang, W., & Shi, C. (2018). Uncertainty, opportunistic behavior, and governance in construction projects: The efficacy of contracts. International journal of project management, 36(5), 795-807.
- Zhang, L., & Verma, B. (2019). Roadside vegetation segmentation with adaptive texton clustering model. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 77, 159-176.
- Zia, S. M., Shah, I. A., Din, S., Junejo, M. A., Junejo, M. A., Butt, F. M., ... & Khaskheli, G. A. (2021). Model for Maintaining Stability in Budget Allocation in Metropolitan Infrastructure Development Projects Using Cost-Risk Contingency. Multicultural Education, 7(6).
Infrastructure projects involve large capital expenditures, extended timelines, and exposure to numerous
uncertainties including cost escalation, schedule delays, and fluctuating financial risks. Conventional financial monitoring
approaches in project accounting rely heavily on deterministic variance analysis techniques such as Cost Variance (CV),
Schedule Variance (SV), and Earned Value Management (EVM). While these methods provide useful retrospective
indicators, they often fail to capture dynamic financial risk exposure and probabilistic cost deviations inherent in complex
infrastructure programs. This study proposes a novel Risk-Adjusted Capital Monitoring Algorithm (RACMA) designed to
enhance financial oversight in infrastructure project accounts through probabilistic risk modeling and adaptive capital
monitoring. RACMA integrates stochastic capital flow modeling, Bayesian risk weighting, and Monte Carlo–driven cost
uncertainty simulation to produce a Risk-Adjusted Capital Performance Index (RCPI) that dynamically evaluates project
financial health. The algorithm incorporates machine-assisted anomaly detection using Gradient Boosted Regression Trees
and probabilistic schedule-cost coupling models to identify emerging capital deviations earlier than traditional monitoring
approaches. The proposed framework is evaluated using simulated infrastructure project financial datasets representing
transportation, energy, and water infrastructure investments. RACMA is compared against traditional financial monitoring
techniques including Earned Value Management (EVM), Standard Variance Analysis (SVA), Forecast-based Budget Control
and Hybrid model. Performance evaluation metrics include prediction accuracy of cost overruns, early risk detection
capability, and capital utilization efficiency. Experimental results demonstrate that RACMA improves cost overrun
prediction accuracy by approximately 28–35%, detects financial risk conditions 3–5 reporting cycles earlier, and reduces
monitoring error margins compared with deterministic variance analysis frameworks. Graphical analyses illustrate
comparative performance trends, including RCPI trajectory plots, risk-adjusted capital deviation curves, and predictive
error distributions. The findings show that integrating probabilistic financial modeling with algorithmic risk adjustment
provides a more reliable decision-support mechanism for infrastructure project finance management. The proposed
algorithm therefore represents a significant advancement in capital monitoring methodologies, offering project managers
and financial controllers a proactive analytical tool for risk-sensitive financial oversight in large-scale infrastructure
programs.
Keywords :
Risk-Adjusted Capital Monitoring Algorithm (RACMA); Infrastructure Project Accounting; Variance Analysis Techniques; Capital Risk Modeling; Infrastructure Financial Analytics.