Authors :
Chibuzo Anulika Virginia; Esau Temitope A.; Akogu Y.; Okoronkwo Samuel Chinonyerem; Unogu Mackson O.
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/32any8ha
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3mh3dk5v
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr524
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
The loss of facial structures can result from congenital conditions, physical trauma, or surgical intervention.
Maxillofacial defects, such as missing ocular, nasal, or aural components, may be addressed via surgical reconstruction or
prosthetic rehabilitation. While managing facial deformities presents significant clinical challenges, silicone prostheses offer
a viable non-surgical alternative for patients seeking aesthetic improvement. The creation of these anatomical replacements
integrates scientific precision with artistic skill, providing a cost-effective and socially acceptable camouflage for individuals
who wish to avoid invasive surgery. This report outlines the step to step procedures required for the successful making of
an adhesive-retained ear appliance.
References :
- Bansal, S., Khindria, S. K., & Kansal, M. (2009). Maxillofacial prosthetic materials. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 9(1), 2–5.
- Beumer, J., Curtis, T. A., & Marunick, M. T. (1996). Maxillofacial rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and surgical considerations. Ishiyaku EuroAmerica.
- Conroy, B. (1983). The history of facial prostheses. Clinics in Plastic Surgery, 10(4), 689–707.
- Gettleman, L. (1994). Facial prosthesis material: A new silicone elastomer. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 71(2), 194–201.
- Goiato, M. C., Pesqueira, A. A., Santos, D. M., Zavanelli, A. C., & Ribeiro, P. D. P. (2010). Color stability comparison of silicone facial prostheses following disinfection and accelerated aging. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 104(3), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60114-0
- Khindria, S. K., Bansal, S., & Kansal, M. (2009). Maxillofacial prosthetic materials. Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society, 9(1), 2–5.
- Lemon, J. C., Chambers, M. S., Wesley, P. J., & Martin, J. W. (1996). Technique for fabricating a mirror-image prosthetic ear. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 75(3), 292–293.
- Parel, S. M., Branemark, P. I., Tjellstrom, A., & Gion, G. (1986). Osseointegration in maxillofacial prosthetics, Part II: Extraoral applications. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 55(5), 600–606.
- Singh, A., Ghosh, S., Kar, S., & Ahmed, I. (2013). Silicone prosthesis for a patient with unilateral ear defect: A clinical case report. European Journal of General Dentistry, 2(3), 315–319.
- Wilkes, G. H., & Wolfaardt, J. F. (1994). Osseointegrated alloplastic versus autogenous ear reconstruction: Criteria for treatment selection. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 93(5), 967–979.
The loss of facial structures can result from congenital conditions, physical trauma, or surgical intervention.
Maxillofacial defects, such as missing ocular, nasal, or aural components, may be addressed via surgical reconstruction or
prosthetic rehabilitation. While managing facial deformities presents significant clinical challenges, silicone prostheses offer
a viable non-surgical alternative for patients seeking aesthetic improvement. The creation of these anatomical replacements
integrates scientific precision with artistic skill, providing a cost-effective and socially acceptable camouflage for individuals
who wish to avoid invasive surgery. This report outlines the step to step procedures required for the successful making of
an adhesive-retained ear appliance.