A Study to Determine Levels of Physical Activity among Health Care Professionals in Bangalore – A Survey


Authors : Zubiyaaaz Ns.; Dr. Smruti Swagatika Dash; Dr. Rajendra Kachhwaha

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/23rkmb46

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/36fyjun6

DOI : https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14836673

Abstract : Introduction Physical activity (PA) is essential for maintaining good health. One of the main risk factors for chronic illnesses, non- communicable diseases (NCDs), overweight, and obesity is physical inactivity. Physical inactivity contributes to mortality and disability since it has been associated with an increased incidence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). According to data from research on medical professionals, the prevalence of PI varies between 34.8% and 87.8%. To quantify many aspects of physical activity, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was created in 1997 as a monitoring tool. To express the intensity and energy expenditure of activities in a way that is comparable among people of different weights, the metabolic equivalent task (MET) is utilised. Our goal was to assess the level of Physical Activity among the healthcare professionals working in a tertiary facility in Bangalore, India.  Methods Using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form (IPAQ-LF), a survey study was conducted. The study comprised 299 young adults between the ages of 25 and 45. The total MET min of activity for each domain was added to determine the levels of physical activity. Following that, the calculated activity levels were categorised as low, moderate, or high.  Results A total of 299 healthcare professionals were recruited, comprising 33.4% allied health care workers, 22.4% nurses, 14% physicians and 30.1% physiotherapist. Means age was 28.62, 14%, 32%, 54% of the healthcare professionals had low, moderate or high physical activity levels respectively.  Conclusion Among the four groups of HCPs, Nurses and Physiotherapists generally show better physical activity levels when compared to the other groups. Physiotherapists (35.6%) have higher percentages with a BMI of 25 or greater were physically active. These HCPs appear to be at risk for NCDs based on their low PA levels. There is an urgent need to establish programs to increase PA among HCPs.

Keywords : Physical Inactivity, Physical Activity, Non-Communicable Diseases, Health Care Professionals, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Body Mass Index.

References :

  1. Cunningham C, O'Sullivan R, Caserotti P, Tully MA. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: A systematic review of reviews and meta‐analyses. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports. 2020 May;30(5):816-27.
  2. Leisure-time physical inactivity among healthcare workers Saulo V. Rocha , Aline R. Barbosa , Tania M. Araújo
  3. World Health Organization. Preventing chronic disease: a vital investment. who global report. Geneva WHO; 2005.
  4. Sisson SB, Katzmarzyk PT. International prevalence of physical activity in youth and adults. Obesity reviews. 2008 Nov;9(6):606-14.
  5. Mandil AM, Alfurayh NA, Aljebreen MA, Aldukhi SA. Physical activity and major non-communicable diseases among physicians in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2016 Nov;37(11):1243-1250. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.11.16268. PMID: 27761564; PMCID: PMC5303803.
  6. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1· 6 million participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2020 Jan 1;4(1):23-35.
  7. Pate RR. The evolving definition of physical fitness. Quest. 1988 Dec 1;40(3):174-9.
  8. George LS, Lais H, Chacko M, Retnakumar C, Krishnapillai V. Motivators and Barriers for Physical Activity among Health-Care Professionals: A Qualitative Study. Indian J Community Med. 2021 Jan-Mar;46(1):66-69. doi: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_200_20. Epub 2021 Mar 1. PMID: 34035579; PMCID: PMC8117884.
  9. World Health Organization. (2010). Global recommendations on physical activity for health.
  10. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, et al. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6: e1077–86.
  11.  United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York United Nations; 2015.
  12. Ekelund U, Sepp H, Brage S, Becker W, Jakes R, Hennings M, Wareham NJ. Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults. Public health nutrition. 2006 Apr;9(2):258-65.
  13. Iwuala SO, Sekoni AO, Olamoyegun MA, Akanbi MA, Sabir AA, Ayankogbe OO. Self-Reported Physical Activity among Health Care Professionals in South West Nigeria. Nigerian journal of clinical practice. 2015 Sep 16;18(6):790-5.Burdick L, Mielke GI, Parra
  14. Afzal S, Altaf M, Nasir M, Bukhari B, Fatima N, Khan S. Metabolic equivalent task assessment for physical activity in students of faculty of allied health sciences, the University of Lahore, Pakistan. Rawal Medical Journal. 2022 Jan 2;47(1):159-.
  15. World Health Organization. Technical Report Series 854. Physical Status. The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Geneva: WHO; 1995. Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/publications/physical_status/en/. [Last accessed on 2014 Oct 20].
  16. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)‑Short and Long Forms; 2005. Available from: http://www.ipaq.ki.se/scoring.pdf.[Last acccessed on 2014 Jul 09].
  17. Ashok P, Kharche JS, Raju R, Godbole G. Metabolic equivalent task assessment for physical activity in medical students. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2017;7(3):236.
  18. Abu Saad H, Low PK, Jamaluddin R, Chee HP. Level of Physical Activity and Its Associated Factors among Primary Healthcare Workers in Perak, Malaysia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 16;17(16):5947. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165947. PMID: 32824361; PMCID: PMC7459827.
  19. Ngarambe R. Physical activity levels and health promotion strategies among physiotherapists in Rwanda.
  20. Skaal L, Pengpid S. Physical activity, fitness level and health problems of healthcare workers in South Africa: The transtheoretical model as an explanatory framework. African Journal for Physical, Health education, Recreation and Dance 2011;17(4):612- 613.
  21. McPhail SM, Waite MC. Physical activity and health-related quality of life among physiotherapists: a cross sectional survey in an Australian hospital and health service. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology. 2014 Dec;9:1-9.
  22. Wilkerson AH, Thomas HO, Nahar VK. Correlates of physical activity behaviour among nursing professionals: a systematic search. J Health Soc Sci. 2019;4:157-72.
  23. Zafiropoulos B, Alison JA, Heard R. Physical activity levels of allied health professionals working in a large Australian metropolitan health district–an observational study. Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare. 2019 Jan 3:51-62.

Introduction Physical activity (PA) is essential for maintaining good health. One of the main risk factors for chronic illnesses, non- communicable diseases (NCDs), overweight, and obesity is physical inactivity. Physical inactivity contributes to mortality and disability since it has been associated with an increased incidence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). According to data from research on medical professionals, the prevalence of PI varies between 34.8% and 87.8%. To quantify many aspects of physical activity, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was created in 1997 as a monitoring tool. To express the intensity and energy expenditure of activities in a way that is comparable among people of different weights, the metabolic equivalent task (MET) is utilised. Our goal was to assess the level of Physical Activity among the healthcare professionals working in a tertiary facility in Bangalore, India.  Methods Using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form (IPAQ-LF), a survey study was conducted. The study comprised 299 young adults between the ages of 25 and 45. The total MET min of activity for each domain was added to determine the levels of physical activity. Following that, the calculated activity levels were categorised as low, moderate, or high.  Results A total of 299 healthcare professionals were recruited, comprising 33.4% allied health care workers, 22.4% nurses, 14% physicians and 30.1% physiotherapist. Means age was 28.62, 14%, 32%, 54% of the healthcare professionals had low, moderate or high physical activity levels respectively.  Conclusion Among the four groups of HCPs, Nurses and Physiotherapists generally show better physical activity levels when compared to the other groups. Physiotherapists (35.6%) have higher percentages with a BMI of 25 or greater were physically active. These HCPs appear to be at risk for NCDs based on their low PA levels. There is an urgent need to establish programs to increase PA among HCPs.

Keywords : Physical Inactivity, Physical Activity, Non-Communicable Diseases, Health Care Professionals, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Body Mass Index.

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe