Authors : Irwin B. Pamintuan; Jet C. Aquino

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/ck42vrwc

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bzdtanjv

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26apr1225

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study developed and evaluated a suitability analysis framework aimed at strengthening Comprehensive Land Use Planning (CLUP) in Local Government Units (LGUs) in the Philippines. As LGUs face increasing pressures from rapid urbanization, environmental degradation, and disaster risks, the need for systematic and evidence-based planning approaches has become more critical. Existing planning practices, while guided by national standards, often rely on fragmented data and limited spatial analysis, affecting the consistency and quality of land use decisions. In response, this research proposes a framework that integrates Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and multi-criteria evaluation to support more objective and data-driven planning. The framework utilizes environmental, socio-economic, and hazardrelated datasets to assess land suitability through a structured process involving criteria identification, weighting, and spatial overlay analysis. These processes generate suitability maps that assist planners in identifying appropriate areas for development while incorporating risk and sustainability considerations. The framework is aligned with CLUP guidelines from the Department of Human Settlements and Urban Development (DHSUD), ensuring its practical applicability. To evaluate the framework, consultations and assessments were conducted with professionals in land use planning and geospatial analysis, focusing on usability, clarity, and potential contribution to planning outcomes. Findings indicate that the framework enhances transparency, consistency, and decision-making quality, enabling LGUs to better align land use allocations with development goals and disaster risk reduction strategies. Overall, the study contributes a practical and adaptable approach to improving local planning processes and supports the integration of geospatial tools in evidence-based land use planning.

Keywords : Suitability Analysis, Comprehensive Land Use Planning, Geographic Information Systems, Spatial Analysis, Land Use Planning, Web-Based Suitability Analysis.

References :

1. Malczewski, J., and Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74757-4
2. Malczewski, J. (2004). GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: A critical overview. Progress in Planning, 62(1), 3–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2003.09.002
3. Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
4. Salazar-Quitalig, R., & Orale, R. L. (2016). Comprehensive land use planning capacity of local government units in Samar, Philippines. Country Development Research Journal.
5. Leppert, G., Hohfeld, L., Lech, M., & Wencker, T. (2018). Impact, diffusion and scaling-up of a comprehensive land-use planning approach in the Philippines: From development cooperation to national policies. SSOAR.
6. Felix, P. A. G., Carrido, A. J. D. C., Soriano, F. A., Esmeralda, A. K. B., Petacio, A. F., Aminulla, M. H. K., Roxas, R. R., Magayanes, L. M., Padao, I. C., & Rivera, M. A. (2026). Assessing institutional readiness and willingness of Philippine LGUs to adopt geospatial land use monitoring tools. ISPRS Archives.
7. Santiago, E. F. III. (2025). Land use governance towards sustainable and smart cities of the future. NRCP Research Journal.
8. Abante, A. M. R., Abante, C. G. R., Bartolata, J. L., Cobilla, M. (2023). Land use policy area (LUPA): A stratagem towards advanced preparedness in the ArcGIS platform. ResearchGate.
9. Cruz, R. B. (2004). Developing a land use information system for local government: The case of Naga City, Philippines. International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation.
10. Endo, I., Magcale-Macandog, D. B., Kojima, S., Johnson, B (2017). Participatory land-use approach for integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation into basin-scale local planning. Sustainable Cities and Society.
11. Gacu, J., Venus, J. A., Forio, C. F., Banay, L., & Soledad, E. (2025). Development of a comprehensive ground suitability index for building construction: A case study. ResearchGate.
12. Eastman, J. R. (2012). Multi-criteria evaluation and GIS. Clark Labs.
13. Soriano, F. A., Carrido, A. J. D. C., Felix, P. A. G., Esmeralda, A. K. B., Petacio, A. F., Aminulla, M. H. K., Roxas, R. R., Magayanes, L. M., Padao, I. C., & Rivera, M. A. (2026). Semi-automated land use monitoring prioritization scheme based on forest loss, cropland loss, and built-up gain from 2000–2020 of Philippine local government units. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences.
14. Tabiongan, R., Bautista, J. F. S., & Margarico, M. C. D. (2024). Project 3D-CLUP: 3D simulation of comprehensive land-use plan maps using GIS and data analytics to promote sustainable development. NRCP Research Journal, 23(1).
15. Serote, E. M. (2004). Property, patrimony, and territory: Foundations of land use planning in the Philippines. UP Press.
16. Witten, I. H., Frank, E., Hall, M. A., & Pal, C. J. (2016). Data mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques (4th ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., & Maurino, A. (2009). Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Computing Surveys, 41(3), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/1541880.1541883
18. Kotu, V., & Deshpande, B. (2018). Data science: Concepts and practice (2nd ed.). Morgan Kaufmann.
19. Power, D. J. (2002). Decision support systems: Concepts and resources for managers. Quorum Books.
20. Sommerville, I. (2016). Software engineering (10th ed.). Pearson.
21. Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M. F., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2015). Geographic information science and systems (4th ed.). Wiley.
22. Alexander, D. (2002). Principles of emergency planning and management. Terra Publishing.
23. Pressman, R. S., & Maxim, B. R. (2020).
24. Software engineering: A practitioner’s approach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
25. Nielsen, J. (2000). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5-users/
26. International Organization for Standardization. (2011). ISO/IEC 25010:2011 Systems and software engineering — Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) — System and software quality models. https://www.iso.org/standard/35733.html
27. International Organization for Standardization. (2013). ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Requirements. https://www.iso.org/isoiec-27001-information-security.html
28. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
29. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
30. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
31. Beck, K., et al. (2001) The Agile Manifesto. Agile Alliance. http://agilemanifesto.org/