Authors : Bryle A. Armeza; Emjay B. Pacia; Rica Angela C. Panaligan; Aaliyah Berdine R. Pasco; Althea Sofia F. Perez; Princess Janine G. Perez; Jeanger M. Plata

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3j5wajtx

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/t5we4sp5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec465

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Engineering students often struggle to grasp abstract concepts in fluid mechanics, particularly hydraulic energy, due to the lack of accessible, hands-on learning tools. This study aimed to design, construct, and evaluate a sustainable bamboo water-wheel prototype to serve as an instructional model for demonstrating basic hydraulic principles. The prototype was built using bamboo, corrosion-resistant wire, waterproof sealant, and plastic paddles, emphasizing affordability, durability, and environmental sustainability. A video experiment was conducted to observe the wheel’s rotation, stability, and response to varying water flow conditions. Findings revealed that the prototype operates smoothly without electricity, accurately responds to changes in water flow, and consistently converts flowing water into mechanical motion. Its simple design, safety, and ease of maintenance make it a practical teaching aid for classrooms or community- based educational activities. Overall, the prototype provides a tangible, interactive approach to visualizing hydraulic energy while promoting sustainable engineering practices and experiential learning.

Keywords : Bamboo Water-Wheel, Hydraulic Energy, Sustainable Instructional Tool, Fluid Mechanics, Hands-on Learning, Renewable Materials.

References :

1. Anderton RS, Vitali J, Blackmore C, & Bakeberg MC (2021). Flexible Teaching and Learning Modalities in Undergraduate Science Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 5:609703. doi:10.3389/feduc.2020.609703
2. Belgica, C. C., Calugan, J. A., Duma, J. U., & Simber, L. A. (2020). Online Distance Learning: Thematic Study on the Challenges Faced by Educare College Inc. Primary Pupils. Mokslinės Leidybos Deimantas – Diamond Scientific Publishing.
3. Cahapay, M. B. (2020). Rethinking Education in the New Normal Post‑COVID‑19 Era: A Curriculum Studies Perspective.
4. Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020). COVID‑19 and Teacher Education: A Literature Review of Online Teaching and Learning Practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 466‑487. doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184
5. Eisner, C., & Vicinus, M. (n.d.). Originality, Imitation, and Plagiarism: Teaching Writing in the Digital Age. The University of Michigan Press and Library.
6. Hofstein, A. (2017). The Role of Laboratory in Science Teaching and Learning. doi:10.1007/978‑94‑6300‑749‑8_26
7. Fabriz, S., Mendzheritskaya, J., & Stehle, S. (2021). Impact  of Synchronous and Asynchronous Settings of Online Teaching and Learning in Higher Education During COVID‑19. Frontiers in Psychology. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsy g.2021.733554/full
8. Lim, F. (2017). An Analysis of Synchronous and Asynchronous Communication Tools in e‑Learning. doi:10.14257/astl.2017.143.46
9. Miller, K. W. (2008). Teaching Science Methods Online: Myths About Inquiry-Based Online Learning. Science Educator, 17(2). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ886175.pdf
10. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2015). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/4962