Academic Performance and Motivation of Science 7 Using Wordwall and Kotobee Digital Applications


Authors : Antonieta D. Tejada; Dr. Wilfred G. Alava Jr.

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2b6e8hde

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may1808

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : The integration of educational technology into the classroom has become essential in enhancing academic performance and motivation. This quasi-experimental research aims to investigate the effect of Wordwall and Kotobee on the grade 7 learners’ academic performance and motivation. It was conducted at Linamon National High School, school year 2024-2025. The study used a set of developed and validated Science 7 lessons integrating Wordwall and Kotobee. A validated research-made 60-item academic performance test and a validated adapted science motivation survey questionnaire. Mean and standard deviation of the data gathered were computed. ANCOVA and a One-Way Independent t-test were employed at the 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that learners exposed to Wordwall performed at a Fairly Satisfactory level, while those exposed to Kotobee achieved a Satisfactory Level. The study also found that learners in both groups were highly motivated in Science. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the academic performance of Grade 7 learners exposed to Wordwall and Kotobee. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the motivation between the groups exposed to Wordwall and Kotobee.

Keywords : Academic Performance; Digital Applications; Kotobee; Wordwall; Motivation.

References :

  1. Ababa, J. et al. (2021) The use of educational applications on the student’s academic performance. International Journal of Academic Multi-disciplinary Research, 5(1), 92-99.
  2. Agusti, N. M. & Aslam (2022) Effectiveness of wordwall application learning media on science learning outcomes of elementary school students. Basicedu Journal, 6(4), 5794-5800.
  3. Alamri, M. M. (2022). Investigating students’ adoption of MOOCs during covid-19 pandemic: Students’ academic self-efficacy, learning engagem ent, and learning persistence. Sustainability, 14(2), 714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020714
  4. ]. Aslan, S. (2021) Analysis of digital literacy self-efficacy levels of pre-service teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education 4(1): 57–67.
  5. Asta, et al. (2024). The Effect of using digital learningapplications on student achievement in elementary schools. Journal Emerging Technologies in Education, 2(1), 21-35. https://doi.org/10.7017 7/jete.v2il.735
  6. Azimah, N. et al. (2023) The effect of wordwall-based evaluation tools on science learning outcomes of Grade VI elementary school students. Education Technology Journal. 2(1), 2962-2972.
  7. Baring, J.J., & Berame, J. (2022) Supporting conceptualcomprehension of newton’s law of motion of Grade 8 students through Kotobee interactive e-module. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 4(3) 209-232. http://journals.ums.acid/index.php/ijolae.v4i3.18790
  8. ]. Bawal, N.M.R, & Cuenca, Z. M. (2023). Mobile- basededucation app for improved performance in empowerment technologies. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Mnagement Research,2(8),819-828. https://doi.org/10.5 8806/ijss hmr.2023.v2i8n11
  9. Calatrava, J.A.R. (2022). Development and evaluation of e-learning materials with Kotobee application in physics science for Grade 11 students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 3(10), 1913-1920.
  10. Carstens, K. et al. (2021). Effects of technology on student learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1). https://files.eric.ed .gov/fulltext/EJ1290791.
  11. Catahan et al. (2025). BookCanBee: Revolutionizingdrug education content through digital modules. Mult. J. Edu. Soc & Tec. Sci.12(1), 29-79. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2025.22356
  12. Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Applying the self- Determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,53(1),16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391 523.2021.1891998
  13. Dhaifi, I. et al. (2024) Enhancing autonomous learning and vocabulary mastery through the effective utilization of online resources and wordwall activities. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 16(3) 4301 – 4312
  14. Efremova, N. & Huseynova, A. (2021). The impact of digital technology on learning motivation and learning modes. EDP Sciences, 1-5. https://doi.org/ 10.1051/e3sconf/202127312083
  15. Fayaryati, D. et al. (2024). Utilization in formative assessment to improve students’ learning outcomes in physics subjects. International Journal Of education and Social Science 5(2) 202-208. https://doi.org/10.56371/ijess.v5i2.315
  16. Fisher, R., Herrington, J., & Staggers, N. (2020). Designing and implementing a hybrid course with a focus on student engagement. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.202 0.17.1.3
  17. Goneda, M.T. et al. (2023). An interactive e-learning design for the grade 12 tvl-ict programming using Kotobee of lagro senior high school. Central Asian Journal of Literature, Philosophy and Culture, 2(4), 74-78 https://doi.org/10.17605/ijie.v4i4.1673
  18. Gottfried, A. E. (2019). Academic intrinsic motivation:Theory, assessment, and longitudinal research. Advances in Motivation Science, Elsevier. 6, 71–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2018.11.001
  19. Hamann, K. et al (2021). What lies beneath: The role of self-efficacy, causal attribution habits, and gender in accounting for the success of college students. Education Sciences 11(7): 333.
  20. Heo, H., Bonk, C. J., & Doo, M. Y. (2021). Enhancing learning engagement during covid‐19 pandemic: Self‐efficacy in time management, technology use, and online learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(6), 1640-1652. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12501
  21. Hoai, V. & Giang, P. (2020). Using Kotobee e-book design and software use in teaching chemistry in high schools. In digital education pedagogy. Apple Academic Press. 133-154.
  22. Hwang, Y. and Oh, J. (2021). The relationship between self-directed learning and problem-solving ability: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy and self- regulated learning among nursing students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(4): 1738.
  23. Jie, Z. L. (2020). The relationship between mathematics attitude, learning engagement and academic achievement. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 3(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-019-00028-7
  24. Kara, M. (2022). Revisiting online learner engagement: Exploring the role of learner characteristics in an emergency period. Journal of Research on Technology in Education 54(1): S236–S252.
  25. Lasala, N. Jr., et al (2025). Honing students’ intrinsic motivation and integrating technology in education through self-learning modules. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences, 23(1), 7323-7333. https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2025-23.1.00568
  26. Kabak, K. (2021). The effect of students’ developing their own digital games on their academic achievement and attitudes towards for English lessons. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 74-93.
  27. Khairunisa, Y. (2021). Utilization of the maze chase wordwall online gamification feature as a digital learning medium for statistics and probability subject. MEDIASI Jurnal Kajian Dan Terapan Media, Bahasa, Komunikasi,2(1),41-47 https://doi.org/10.46961/mediasi.v2i1.254
  28. Kuo, T. M., Tsai, C. C., & Wang, J. C. (2021). Linkingweb-based learning self-efficacy and learning engagement in MOOCs: The role of online academic hardiness. The Internet and Higher Education, 51, 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100819
  29. Kwarikunda, D., Schiefele, U., Muwonge, C.M. & Ssenyonga, J. (2022). Profiles of learners based on their cognitive and metacognitive learning strategy use: Occurrence and relations with gender, intrinsic motivation, and perceived autonomy support. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9, 337. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01322-1
  30. Mazelin, N. et al. (2022) Using wordwall to improve students’ engagement in esl classroom. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 12(8), 273-280. http://www.aessweb.com/doi:10.55493/5007.
  31. Otico, et al. (2023) Utilization of e-book kotobee reader as an interactive learning tool in developing 8th grade mathematics skill. Asian Journal of Applied Research for Community Development and Empowerment,7(1),146-151 https://doi.org/10.29165/ajarcde.v7il.139
  32. Perocho, et al. (2023) Digitalized modules through kotobee application: A teaching intervention on improving pupils’ performance level in science subject. Spring Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(03), 01-11 https://doi.org/10.555 59/sjahss.v2103.87
  33. Rafiq, S. et al. (2024). The impact of digital tools andonline platforms on higher education learning outcomes. Al-Mahdi Research Journal,359-369. https://ojs.mrj.com.pk/index.php/MRJ/issue/view/14
  34. Rohmani, R., (2024) Analysis of the effectiveness of wordwall media use on science learning outcomes in elementary schools. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(4) 891-905. http://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/ijolae.v4i3.18790
  35. Sabanal, G. J. et al. (2023) Motivation and academic performance of secondary students in science: A correlational study. Asian Journal of Science Education, 5(2) 20-29. https:// DOI: 10.24815/ajse.v5i2.31668
  36. Safitri, D. et al. (2022). Improvement of student learning motivation through word-wall-based digital game media. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(6) 188-205 https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i06.25729
  37. Seeret Omar Shah & Manzoor Hussain. (2021). Cultural capital and academic performance. International Journal of All Research Education and Scientific Methods (IJARESM), 9(9), 1377-1382.
  38. Sentani, A. D., et al. (2022) Implementation of Wordwall game to improve english learning outcomes in class x smk muhammadiyah 1 kota sukabumi. Journal of Information Technology and Vocational Education 4(1), 1-8.
  39. Shemy, N. (2020). The impact of digital storytelling on motivation and achievement in teaching scientific concepts for pre-school students. Europian Journal of Education Studies. 7(12), 801-819. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejesv7i12.3627
  40. Shin, M., & Bolkan, S. (2021). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic, motivation: The mediating influence of student engagement, self- efficacy and student academic support. Communication Education, 70(2), 146-164.
  41. Solleza, A. (2024). Effectiveness of the interactive word wall in improving the low performance in science of the grade 5 learners of Infanta central school. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(11), 360-365. https://ijrpr.com/uploads/V5ISSUE11/IJRPR34647
  42. Siano, L. & Potane, J. (2022). Using interactive e- books to improve students’ academic achievement in mathematics. United International Journal for Research & Technology 3, 30-36. https://uijrt.com/articles/v3/i5/UIJRTV3I50006
  43. Sofiana, N. & Mubarok, H. (2020). The impact of English game-based mobile application on students’ reading achievement and learning motivation. International Journal of Instruction. 13(3),247-258.
  44. Susilowati, N., Mahmud, A., & Sari, P. N. (2022). Communication skill, student engagement and self- efficacy: Flow on effect on student online learning. Journal of Education Technology, 6(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.15294/jet.v6i1.44172
  45. Torrington, J. (2023). Elementary students’ self- regulation in computer-based learning environments: How do self-report measures, observations and teacher rating relate to task performance? British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13338
  46. Tosari and Kasriman (2024). The influence of Wordwall media on the learning outcomes of grade iii Student in science learning changes in the form of objects. Journal Cakrawala Pendas, 20(4), 968-977 http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v10i410644
  47. Tusoy, M. (2023). Digitized Kotobee interactive learning e-book: Its effect on academic performance of grade 9 students in science. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(8), 692-700. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7750475
  48. Widhiatama, D. & Brameswari, C., (2024). The Effectiveness of Wordwall in enhancing students’ engagement and motivation in literature classes. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7.4.3(2024)
  49. Widowati, A. et al. (2023). Factors affecting students’ academic performance: Self-efficacy, digital literacy, and academic engagement effects. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 885-898. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16449a
  50. Yulianto, G. (2022). Developing interactive english e- book using Kotobee author for smas pelita raya 10th grade students. Journal of English as a Foreign Language Education, 3(1), 38-47. https://jurnal.un tan.ac.id/index.php/JEF LE/article/view/5673

The integration of educational technology into the classroom has become essential in enhancing academic performance and motivation. This quasi-experimental research aims to investigate the effect of Wordwall and Kotobee on the grade 7 learners’ academic performance and motivation. It was conducted at Linamon National High School, school year 2024-2025. The study used a set of developed and validated Science 7 lessons integrating Wordwall and Kotobee. A validated research-made 60-item academic performance test and a validated adapted science motivation survey questionnaire. Mean and standard deviation of the data gathered were computed. ANCOVA and a One-Way Independent t-test were employed at the 0.05 level of significance. Findings revealed that learners exposed to Wordwall performed at a Fairly Satisfactory level, while those exposed to Kotobee achieved a Satisfactory Level. The study also found that learners in both groups were highly motivated in Science. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the academic performance of Grade 7 learners exposed to Wordwall and Kotobee. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the motivation between the groups exposed to Wordwall and Kotobee.

Keywords : Academic Performance; Digital Applications; Kotobee; Wordwall; Motivation.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - July - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe