Authors : Navin Kumar Sehgal; Antim Dev Mishra

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4c8b2d65

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/5c3d466w

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov872

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : The rapid growth of digital functionality has intensified the challenge of designing interfaces that remain simple yet powerful. This study proposes an Adaptive Minimal Interface System (AMIS) that balances simplicity, efficiency, and personalization through context-aware multimodal design. The system integrates findings from contemporary research on adaptive user interfaces, multimodal interaction, and AI-driven personalization. AMIS employs a learn–adapt–simplify methodology, where the interface continuously learns user intent, adapts modality (text, audio, or video) based on environmental context, and simplifies visible features without reducing capability. Using a feedback-based control model, the system dynamically adjusts interface density and feature visibility according to metrics such as ease of use, workflow success, and help availability. A prototype evaluation using simulated datasets demonstrated a 22–30% improvement in task efficiency, a 19% reduction in errors, and a 31% increase in user satisfaction compared to static interfaces. Results confirm that adaptive minimalism enhances usability and personalization while maintaining full system functionality. The study concludes that combining machine learning, multimodal input, and adaptive minimalism enables intelligent, user- centric systems that anticipate needs, reduce cognitive load, and streamline interaction across devices. This approach redefines user experience by transforming interfaces into context-sensitive collaborators rather than static tools, advancing the next generation of efficient and human-centered interface design.

Keywords : Adaptive User Interfaces; Minimal Interface Design; Context-Aware Systems; Multimodal Interaction; Human– Computer Interaction (HCI); Personalization; User Experience (UX); Artificial Intelligence (AI); Workflow Efficiency; Machine Learning; Intelligent Systems; Usability Optimization; Cognitive Load Reduction; Adaptive Design Framework; Human-Centered Computing.

References :

1. Y. Ono, M. Kobayashi, M. Sugimoto, and K. Sumiya, “Memoro: Using large language models to realize a concise interface for real-time memory augmentation,” Proc. CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst., 2024.
2. S. Yang, T. Lee, J. Hwang, and S. Kim, “FluidXP: Enabling dynamic interface adaptation through large language models,” Proc. CHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Syst., 2024.
3. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, “User interface design and information systems usage: An empirical examination of ease of use, usefulness, and behavioral intentions,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 311–330, 1996.
4. R. Patel, K. Mehta, and P. Desai, “Contextual adaptive user interface for Android devices,” Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 215–222, 2022.
5. M. Wiebe, D. Y. Geiskkovitch, and A. Bunt, “Exploring user attitudes towards different approaches to command recommendation in feature-rich software,” Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 43–47, 2016.
6. R. Jain, J. Bose, and T. Arif, “Future of mobile user interface: Adding modalities – speech & touch,” Proc. IEEE INDICON, Mumbai, India pp. 1–6, 2013.
7. M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA:  University Science, 1989.