Authors : Tony Isioma Azonuche; Joy Onma Enyejo

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4njkvkkz

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3nznetrd

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr2002

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : In today’s dynamic software development landscape, agile methodologies have become the standard for delivering iterative, customer-focused solutions. However, the volatile nature of agile projects, characterized by evolving requirements, cross-functional dependencies, and fluctuating team performance, necessitates a more sophisticated approach to risk management. This review explores the integration of adaptive risk management frameworks with predictive analytics and real-time velocity data visualization dashboards to enhance decision-making and resilience in agile environments. By leveraging historical sprint metrics, machine learning models, and time-series forecasting techniques, predictive analytics can identify emerging risks related to delivery slippage, quality degradation, or capacity constraints. Simultaneously, real- time dashboards enable continuous monitoring of key performance indicators such as sprint velocity, burndown rates, defect leakage, and team throughput, offering visual cues that support early intervention strategies. The study critically analyzes current tools and frameworks—such as Jira, Azure DevOps, and custom-built analytics platforms—used to implement these techniques. It also highlights best practices in integrating anomaly detection algorithms, heatmaps, and alert systems for proactive risk mitigation. Additionally, the paper evaluates how adaptive risk management promotes agile maturity, enhances transparency among stakeholders, and supports continuous improvement through feedback loops. By synthesizing findings from recent empirical studies and industry applications, this review underscores the transformative potential of predictive data-driven approaches in elevating agile project performance and ensuring sustainable delivery outcomes.

Keywords : Adaptive Risk Management; Agile Project Management; Predictive Analytics; Velocity Data Visualization; Real-Time Dashboard Monitoring.

References :

1. Akindote, O., Enyejo, J. O., Awotiwon, B. O. & Ajayi, A. A. (2024). Integrating Blockchain and Homomorphic Encryption to Enhance Security and Privacy in Project Management and Combat Counterfeit Goods in Global Supply Chain Operations. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology Volume 9, Issue 11, NOV. 2024, ISSN No:-2456-2165.           https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV149.
2. Akindote, O., Igba E., Awotiwon, B. O., & Otakwu, A (2024). Blockchain Integration in Critical Systems Enhancing Transparency, Efficiency, and Real-Time Data Security in Agile Project Management, Decentralized Finance (DeFi), and Cold Chain Management. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology (IJSRMT) Volume 3, Issue 11, 2024. DOI: 10.38124/ijsrmt.v3i11.107.
3. Akoglu, L., Tong, H., & Koutra, D. (2015). Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey. Data mining and knowledge discovery, 29, 626-688.
4. Anyibama, B. J., Orjinta, K. K., Omisogbon, T. O., Atalor, S. I., Daniels, E. O., Fadipe, E. & Galadima, D. A. (2025). Modern Agricultural Technologies for Sustainable Food Production: A Comprehensive Review of Technological Innovations and Their Impact on Global Food Systems. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology Volume 10, Issue 2, ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14964384
5. Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
6. Avevor, J., Aikins, S. A. & Enyejo, L. A. (2025). Optimizing Gas and Steam Turbine Performance Through Predictive Maintenance and Thermal Optimization for Sustainable and Cost-Effective Power Generation. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology Volume 10, Issue 3  https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar1336
7. Ayoola, V. B., Idoko, P. I., Danquah, E. O.,  Ukpoju, E. A.,  Obasa, J.,  Otakwu, A. & Enyejo, J. O. (2024). Optimizing Construction Management and Workflow Integration through Autonomous Robotics for Enhanced Productivity Safety and Precision on Modern Construction Sites. International Journal of Scientific Research and Modern Technology (IJSRMT). Vol 3, Issue 10, 2024. https://www.ijsrmt.com/index.php/ijsrmt/article/view/56
8. Azonuche T. I, Aigbogun, M. E & Enyejo, J. O. (2025). Investigating Hybrid Agile Frameworks Integrating Scrum and Devops for Continuous Delivery in Regulated Software Environments. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology  Volume 10, Issue 4, ISSN No:-2456-2165 https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1164
9. Banerjee, A., & Mahanti, A. (2019). A risk taxonomy for agile software development: A systematic literature review and empirical validation. Information and Software Technology, 114, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2019.06.003
10. Bosch, J. (2012). Building products as innovation experiment systems. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Rapid Continuous Software Engineering, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2012.6227094
11. Ceylan, E., Kutlubay, F. O., & Bener, A. B. (2006, August). Software defect identification using machine learning techniques. In 32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO'06) (pp. 240-247). IEEE.
12. Conboy, K., & Lang, M. (2012). Agile practices: The impact on trust in software project teams. IEEE Software, 29(3), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2011.118
13. Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2016). Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development? Project Management Journal, 47(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697281604700303
14. de França, B. B. N., de Figueiredo, L. H. M., & de Sousa, K. P. A. (2019). Mining GitHub for predicting agile project risks: A machine learning approach. Journal of Systems and Software, 156, 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.087
15. De Haes, S., Van Grembergen, W., & Debreceny, R. S. (2013). COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities. Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50422
16. Drury-Grogan, M. L. (2014). Performance on agile teams: Relating iteration objectives and critical decisions to project management success factors. Information and Software Technology, 56(5), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.10.010
17. Ebika, I. M., Idoko, D. O., Efe, F., Enyejo, L. A.,  Otakwu, A., & Odeh, I. I., (2024). Utilizing Machine Learning for Predictive Maintenance of Climate-Resilient Highways through Integration of Advanced Asphalt Binders and Permeable Pavement Systems with IoT Technology. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. Volume 9, Issue 11, November– 2024 ISSN No:-2456-2165. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV074
18. Enyejo, J. O., Fajana, O. P., Jok, I. S., Ihejirika, C. J.,  Awotiwon,  B. O., & Olola, T. M. (2024). Digital Twin Technology, Predictive Analytics, and Sustainable Project Management in Global Supply Chains for Risk Mitigation, Optimization, and Carbon Footprint Reduction through Green Initiatives. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, Volume 9, Issue 11, November– 2024.  ISSN No:-2456-2165.   https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24NOV1344
19. Fernandez, D. J., & Fernandez, J. D. (2008). Agile project management—Agilism versus traditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 10–17. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=Agile+project+management—Agilism+versus+traditional+approaches&author=Fernandez&publication_year=2008
20. Few, S., & Edge, B. (2013). The design and use of dashboards for performance monitoring in agile environments. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 23(1-2), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2013.748613
21. Heravi, G., Coffey, V., & Trigunarsyah, B. (2015). Evaluating the level of risk management maturity in construction projects using a predictive analytics approach. Automation in Construction, 58, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.011
22. Hillson, D., & Murray-Webster, R. (2007). Understanding and managing risk attitude. International Journal of Project Management, 25(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.06.007
23. Hobbs, B., & Petit, Y. (2017). Agile methods on large projects in large organizations: A multiple-case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 122, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.09.027
24. Igba, E., Danquah, E. O.,  Ukpoju, E. A.,   Obasa, J.,  Olola, T. M., & Enyejo, J. O. (2024). Use of Building Information Modeling (BIM) to Improve Construction Management in the USA. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 23(03), 1799–1813. https://wjarr.com/content/use-building-information-modeling-bim-improve-construction-management-usa
25. Ijiga, A. C., Olola, T. M., Enyejo, L. A., Akpa, F. A., Olatunde, T. I., & Olajide, F. I. (2024). Advanced surveillance and detection systems using deep learning to combat human trafficking. Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, 2024, 11(01), 267–286. https://magnascientiapub.com/journals/msarr/sites/default/files/MSARR-2024-0091.pdf.
26. Ijiga, O. M., Idoko, I. P., Ebiega, G. I., Olajide, F. I., Olatunde, T. I., & Ukaegbu, C. (2024). Harnessing adversarial machine learning for advanced threat detection: AI-driven strategies in cybersecurity risk assessment and fraud prevention. Open Access Research Journals. Volume 13, Issue.  https://doi.org/10.53022/oarjst.2024.11.1.0060I
27. Jørgensen, M., & Shepperd, M. (2007). A systematic review of software development cost estimation studies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 33(1), 33–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2007.256943
28. Kuhrmann, M., Fernández, D. M., & Daneva, M. (2017). On the use of feedback in agile software development: A literature review and research agenda. Information and Software Technology, 92, 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.07.010
29. Kutsch, E., & Hall, M. (2010). Deliberate ignorance in project risk management. International Journal of Project Management, 28(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2009.03.003
30. Liu, Y., Yang, D., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Liu, J., Boukerche, A., ... & Song, L. (2024). Generalized video anomaly event detection: Systematic taxonomy and comparison of deep models. ACM Computing Surveys, 56(7), 1-38.
31. Mangalaraj, G., Mahapatra, R., & Nerur, S. (2014). Assessing the quality of agile risk management practices: Insights from a case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 95, 70–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2014.03.027
32. Marijan, D., Gotlieb, A., & Sen, S. (2013). Predicting risk in agile projects using machine learning approaches. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops, 302–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW.2013.50
33. Mishra, D., Mishra, A., & Ostrovska, S. (2012). Impact of physical ambiance on communication, collaboration and coordination in agile software development: An empirical evaluation. Information and Software Technology, 54(10), 1067–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2012.04.002
34. Moe, N. B., Šmite, D., Ågerfalk, P. J., & Jørgensen, M. (2012). Understanding the dynamics in distributed agile teams: A case study of two agile teams. Information and Software Technology, 54(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.07.008
35. Mohanani, R., Turhan, B., & Ralph, P. (2019). Requirements framing affects design creativity. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 45(7), 635–656. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2018.2836103
36. Nearshore, (2024). Use data to make informed decisions. Understanding the Importance of Data-Driven Decision Making. https://www.nearshore-it.eu/articles/data-driven-decision-making/
37. Okoh, O. F., Ukpoju, E. A., Otakwu. A., Ayoolad, V. B. & Enyejo, L. A. (2024). CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT: SOME ISSUES IN THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. Engineering Heritage Journal (GWK). ISSN: 2521-0440 (Online).  DOI: http://doi.org/10.26480/gwk.01.2024.42.50
38. Olsson, H. H., Alahyari, H., & Bosch, J. (2012). Climbing the "stairway to heaven" – A multiple-case study exploring barriers in the transition to continuous deployment. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 38th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, 392–399. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2012.61
39. Osipova, E., & Eriksson, P. E. (2013). Balancing control and flexibility in joint risk management: Lessons learned from two construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 31(3), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.08.005
40. Rangineni, S., Bhanushali, A., Suryadevara, M., Venkata, S., & Peddireddy, K. (2023). A Review on enhancing data quality for optimal data analytics performance. International Journal of Computer Sciences and Engineering, 11(10), 51-58.
41. Raz, T., & Michael, E. (2001). Use and benefits of tools for project risk management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00036-8
42. Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Noble, A. (2018). Agile at scale. Harvard business review, 96(3), 88-96.
43. Rigby, D., Sutherland, J., & Takeuchi, H. (2016). Embracing agile—Harvard business review.
44. Salleh, N., Mendes, E., & Grundy, J. (2011). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 53(9), 833–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.01.007
45. Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work?—A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006
46. Solinski, A., & Petersen, K. (2016). Prioritizing agile benefits and limitations in relation to practice usage. Software Quality Journal, 24(2), 447–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-015-9285-5
47. Stettina, C. J., & Hörz, J. (2015). Agile portfolio management: An empirical perspective on the practice in use. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.008
48. Stray, V., Moe, N. B., & Hoda, R. (2019). Autonomous agile teams: Challenges and future directions for research. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE 41st International Conference on Software Engineering, 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2019.00027
49. Torkar, R., Papatheocharous, E., & Feldt, R. (2020). On the use of software design models in agile development: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 170, 110717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.110717
50. Vichkanova, T. (2024). 4 Scrum Metrics to Stay Productive Sprint Velocity. https://ascendixtech.com/how-we-measure-software-project-quality-scrum-metrics/
51. Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for agile project management. Information & Management, 55(7), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.12.004
52. Willumsen, P., Oehmen, J., Stingl, V., & Geraldi, J. (2019). Value creation through project risk management: A case study of the utility of risk management practices. International Journal of Project Management, 37(5), 731–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2019.01.007
53. Yazici, H. J. (2009). The role of project management maturity and organizational culture in perceived performance. Project Management Journal, 40(3), 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20121
54. Zou, P. X. W., Kiviniemi, M., & Jones, K. (2017). A review of risk management through building information modelling in construction projects. Safety Science, 97, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.027