Authors : Adebowale Adedokun

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 8 - August

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4e7a6yjf

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yevpepfc

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26aug467

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Purpose: This paper presents a comprehensive conceptual review of advanced procurement ethics and professional practice, synthesizing fragmented literature across ethical foundations, professional standards, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and sustainable supply chain management into a coherent analytical framework.  Design/Methodology/Approach: Employing a narrative literature review methodology, the study integrates peer-reviewed scholarship, professional body guidelines (CIPS, ISM, NIGP, IFPSM), and multilateral policy frameworks (OECD, UN, World Bank) to examine the evolution and current state of procurement ethics. The analysis is structured thematically and informed by stakeholder theory, institutional theory, and Carroll’s CSR pyramid.  Findings: The review reveals that ethical procurement operates across four interconnected dimensions: (1) deontological and virtue-based ethical foundations; (2) codified professional conduct and supplier governance mechanisms; (3) socially responsible purchasing that extends beyond compliance to discretionary stakeholder engagement; and (4) sustainable procurement integrating environmental, social, and economic (ESE) criteria. While significant institutional progress has been made in standardizing codes of conduct and anti-corruption measures, persistent gaps remain in addressing algorithmic bias in AI-driven procurement, ensuring traceability in multi-tier supply chains, and professionalizing procurement functions in developing economies.  Research Limitations/Implications: As a conceptual review, the study does not empirically test causal relationships. Future research should employ quantitative meta-analysis and longitudinal case studies to validate the proposed integrative framework.  Practical Implications: Procurement leaders should adopt integrated ethical governance systems that combine mandatory compliance, voluntary CSR, and digital ethics. The findings support the institutionalization of continuous professional development (CPD) programs and the adoption of explainable AI (XAI) frameworks to ensure transparency in automated procurement decisions.  Originality/Value: This paper contributes to procurement literature by explicitly connecting traditional business ethics principles with emerging challenges in digital procurement, modern slavery prevention, and climate-responsive sourcing, offering an integrated framework for scholars and practitioners.

Keywords : Procurement Ethics, Professional Practice, Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainable Procurement, Supply Chain Governance, Code of Conduct, AI Ethics, Supplier Relationship Management.

References :

1. Ada Lovelace Institute. (2024). Buying AI: Procurement of AI and data-driven systems in local government. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/buying-ai-procurement/
2. Agwot, K. R. (2024). Exploring systemic and behavioral factors influencing corruption in public procurement: A global comparative study. Journal of Business and Management Studies, 6(6), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.32996/jbms.2024.6.6.7
3. Ahi, P., & Searcy, C. (2015). An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005
4. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2019). Principles of biomedical ethics (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.
5. Beauchamp, T. L., Bowie, N. E., & Arnold, D. G. (2018). Ethical theory and business (10th ed.). Pearson.
6. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1997). Writing narrative literature reviews. Review of General Psychology, 1(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.1.3.311
7. Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2002). Logistics social responsibility: An integrative framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 23(1), 145–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2002.tb00014.x
8. Carter, C. R., & Jennings, M. M. (2004). The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility: A structural equation analysis. Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), 145–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2004.tb00171.x
9. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
10. Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply. (2013). Socially responsible procurement. CIPS.
11. Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply. (2019). Ethical procurement and supply. https://www.cips.org/ethics/
12. Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply. (2021). Ethical procurement and supply chain management. https://www.cips.org/ethics/ethical-procurement-and-supply-chain-management/
13. Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply. (2024). CIPS code of conduct. https://www.cips.org/about-us/cips-code-of-conduct
14. Comprara. (2025, January 31). The ethics of AI in procurement: Avoiding bias and building trust. https://www.comprara.com.au/the-ethics-of-ai-in-procurement-avoiding-bias-and-building-trust/
15. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2019). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
16. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
17. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone Publishing.
18. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge University Press.
19. Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(1), 75–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2005.16132536
20. Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI sustainability reporting standards. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
21. Green, B. N., Johnson, C. D., & Adams, A. (2006). Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6
22. Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (2014). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.
23. Helmold, M. (2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethics in supplier management. In Innovative supplier management (pp. 131–147). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39245-1_10
24. Institute for Supply Management. (2019). Ethical principles and guidelines for the purchasing and supply management profession. https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-competency/supply-management-ethics/
25. Institute for Supply Management. (2020). Guidelines for professional practice of supply management. https://www.ismworld.org/
26. Institute for Supply Management. (2021). Principles of sustainability and social responsibility. https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-competency/sustainability/
27. International Federation of Purchasing and Supply Management. (2014). IFPSM global standard for professional competence in purchasing and supply. https://www.ifpsm.org/
28. International Institute for Sustainable Development. (2021). Sustainable public procurement. https://www.iisd.org/topics/sustainable-public-procurement
29. International Integrated Reporting Council. (2013). The International  framework. https://integratedreporting.org/resource/international-ir-framework/
30. International Trade Centre. (2020). Sustainable procurement: A guide for procurement practitioners. https://www.intracen.org/
31. International Trade Centre. (2021). Sustainable procurement guide: Good practices for integrating environmental and social considerations into procurement. https://www.intracen.org/
32. Johnson, R., & Duberley, J. (2000). Understanding management ethics. Sage Publications.
33. Lennick, D., & Kiel, F. (2011). Moral intelligence 2.0: Enhancing business performance and leadership success in turbulent times. Pearson Education.
34. Morali, O., & Searcy, C. (2013). A review of sustainable supply chain management practices in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 635–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1712-4
35. National Institute of Governmental Purchasing. (2018). NIGP code of ethics. https://www.nigp.org/
36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. https://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/mne/
37. Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Purnell, L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 403–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003655182
38. Public Procurement Regulatory Authority. (2017). Public procurement ethics and integrity. https://www.ppra.go.tz/
39. Radanliev, P. (2025). Privacy, ethics, transparency, and accountability in AI systems for wearable devices. Frontiers in Digital Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2025.XXXXXX
40. Sánchez-Flores, R. B., Cruz-Sotelo, S. E., Ojeda-Benitez, S., & Ramírez-Barreto, M. E. (2020). Sustainable supply chain management—A literature review on emerging economies. Sustainability, 12, 6972. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176972
41. Sarfraz, M., Khawaja, K. F., Han, H., Ariza-Montes, A., & Arjona-Fuentes, J. M. (2023). Sustainable supply chain, digital transformation, and blockchain technology adoption in the tourism sector. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02354-4
42. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
43. Solomon, R. C. (2011). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford University Press.
44. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board. (2021). SASB standards. https://www.sasb.org/standards/
45. Sustainable Purchasing Leadership Council. (n.d.). Sustainable purchasing 101. https://www.sustainablepurchasing.org/
46. Taticchi, P., Garengo, P., Nudurupati, S. S., Tonelli, F., & Pasqualino, R. (2015). A review of decision-support tools and performance measurement in sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6473–6494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.939239
47. The World Bank. (2021). Ethical procurement guidelines. https://siteresources.worldbank.org/ PROCUREMENT/
48. The World Bank. (2021). Procurement framework. https://policies.worldbank.org/en/policy/procurement-framework
49. Treviño, L. K., & Nelson, K. A. (2020). Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right (8th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
50. Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Brown, M. E. (2014). Managing ethics in organizations: Designing and maintaining an ethical organizational climate. John Wiley & Sons.
51. United Nations Development Programme. (2012). Handbook on procurement professionalization: Capacity development. https://www.undp.org/
52. United Nations Environment Programme. (2018). Sustainable public procurement implementation guidelines. https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/
53. United Nations Global Compact. (2021). Supply chain sustainability. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/our-work/supply-chain
54. United Nations Global Compact. (2021). Supply chain sustainability: A practical guide for continuous improvement. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/library/1
55. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2013). Practical guide to corruption prevention in public procurement. https://www.unodc.org/
56. Velasquez, M. G. (2017). Business ethics: Concepts and cases (8th ed.). Pearson.
57. Waddock, S. A., & Lozano, J. M. (2013). Developing more holistic management education: Lessons learned from two programs. Journal of Management Education, 37(3), 329–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912464609
58. Westra, L., & Werhane, P. H. (Eds.). (2011). The business of consumption: Environmental ethics and the global economy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
59. Wicks, A. C., Freeman, R. E., Werhane, P. H., & Martin, K. E. (2018). Business ethics: A managerial approach (2nd ed.). Pearson.
60. Williams, B. D., Roh, J., Tokar, T., & Swink, M. (2013). Leveraging supply chain visibility for responsiveness: The moderating role of internal integration. Journal of Operations Management, 31(7–8), 543–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.09.001
61. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2017). Sustainable procurement guide. https://docs.wbcsd.org/
62. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2021). Sustainable supply chain management. WBCSD.
63. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2012). Examining the effects of green supply chain management practices and their mediations on performance improvements. International Journal of Production Research, 50(5), 1377–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2011.571937
64. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. (2013). Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(2), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001