Authors :
Raphael I. Areola; Isola O. Mathew; Oyelade A. Omolara
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/ynpf3h6d
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/4xzvyfjf
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep1208
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
Solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity is expanding rapidly, yet real-world energy yield still hinges on how reliably
controllers track the maximum power point under disturbances such as partial shading, fast irradiance ramps, sensor noise,
and embedded hardware limits. This review evaluates three intelligence families for MPPT: Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy
Inference Systems (ANFIS), Deep Learning (DL), and Reinforcement Learning (RL)through a deployment lens rather than
simulation alone. Using a structured search (2018–2025) across major databases, we prioritised studies with processor-
/hardware-in-the-loop (PIL/HIL) or embedded MCU/FPGA validation, and judged methods on four discriminating metrics:
(i) global-peak hit rate under shading, (ii) convergence time and overshoot, (iii) steady-state power ripple, and (iv) edge
feasibility (number format, latency, resources), alongside interpretability and audit requirements. Findings show ANFIS as
the risk-adjusted frontrunner in non-benign conditions: compact, fixed-point designs consistently deliver millisecond-scale
settling and ~99–100% tracking in dynamic tests, while hybrids (e.g., ANFIS-PSO/GEP or with nonlinear scaffolds) further
suppress ripple and improve global-peak discovery. DL/RL can match or exceed ANFIS when rich sensing, compute
headroom, and mature ML governance exist, but their gains are contingent on data pipelines, quantisation/latency
engineering, safe exploration, and explainability. We recommend a SIL→PIL→HIL rollout, energy-weighted metrics under
standardised shading/ramp scripts, and deploying a lean, auditable ANFIS now graduating DL/RL where HIL-proven
advantages justify their operational complexity.
References :
- IRENA. (2023). World Energy Transitions Outlook 2023: 1.5°C Pathway, Vol. 1.
- IRENA. (2023). Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022.
- IRENA. (2022). RE-organizing Power Systems for the Transition.
- IRENA. (2022). Renewable Energy Outlook for ASEAN: Towards a Regional Energy Transition (2nd Edition).
- IRENA. (2023). Renewable Energy Statistics 2023.
- Jang, J.-S. R. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System.
- Boubaker, O., & Djemai, M. (2023). MPPT Techniques for Photovoltaic Systems: A Systematic Review.
- Katche, M. L., & Yeboah, A. S. N. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques.
- Kermadi, M., Salam, Z., Abdelaziz, A. M., & Aliman, O. (2020). Recent Developments of MPPT Techniques for PV Systems Under Partial Shading Conditions.
- Belhachat, F., & Larbes, C. (2017). Global Maximum Power Point Tracking Based on ANFIS for PV Arrays Under Partial Shading.
- Endiz, M. S., & Ozkan, S. B. (2025). A Review of Traditional and Advanced MPPT Approaches for PV Systems.
- Bandara, A., Thilakarathne, N. D., & Dewasurendra, S. D. (2024). LSTM-Based MPPT Algorithm for Efficient Energy Harvesting.
- Chevtchenko, S. F., Delgago, D., & Montenegro, R. (2022). Combining PPO/DRL with Incremental Conductance for MPPT.
- Wadehra, A., & Bhattacharya, P. (2024). A Deep Recurrent Reinforcement Learning Approach for Enhanced MPPT in PV Systems.
- Chnini, K., Derbel, N., & Elleuch, M. (2025). Embedded Processor-in-the-Loop Implementation of ANFIS-Based Nonlinear MPPT Strategies for Photovoltaic Systems.
- Khan, M., Raza, M. A., Faheem, M., Sarang, S. A., Panhwar, M., & Jumani, T. A. (2024). Conventional and Artificial Intelligence-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Efficient Solar Power Generation.
- Ishrat, Z., Gupta, A. K., & Nayak, S. (2024). A Comprehensive Review on MPPT Techniques Based on ML Applicable for Maximum Power in Solar Power Systems.
- Chalh, A., El Hammoumi, A., Motahhir, S., El Ghzizal, A., Derouich, A., Masud, M., & AlZain, M. A. (2021). Investigation of Partial Shading Scenarios on a Photovoltaic Array’s Characteristics.
- Onu, P., Pradhan, A., & Madonsela, N. S. (2024). Explainable AI (XAI) in Smart Grids for Predictive Maintenance: A Survey.
- Endiz, M. S., Gökkuş, G., Coşgun, A. E., & Demir, H. (2025). A Review of Traditional and Advanced MPPT Approaches for PV Systems Under Uniformly Insolation and Partially Shaded Conditions.
- Belhachat, F., & Larbes, C. (2019). Comprehensive Review on Global Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for PV Systems Subjected to Partial Shading Conditions.
- Worku, M. Y., Hassan, M. A., Maraaba, L. S., Shafiullah, M., Elkadeem, M. R., Hossain, M. I., & Abido, M. A. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Recent Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques for Photovoltaic Systems Under Partial Shading.
- Ishrat, Z., Gupta, A. K., & Nayak, S. (2024). Optimizing Photovoltaic Arrays: A Novel Approach to Maximize Power Output in Varied Shading Patterns.
- Aldair, A. A., Obed, A. A., & Halihal, A. F. (2018). Design and Implementation of ANFIS-Reference Model Controller-Based MPPT Using FPGA for Photovoltaic System.
- Franco, D. S., Duarte, F. A., Salau, N. P. G., & Dotto, G. L. (2020). Analysis of Indium (III) Adsorption from Leachates of LCD Screens Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference Systems (ANFIS).
- Phillips, P. J., Hahn, C. A., Fontana, P. C., Yates, A. N., Greene, K., Stoian, A., & Przybocki, M. A. (2021). Four Principles of Explainable Artificial Intelligence.
- PRISMA. (2020). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 Documents.
- Manna, S., Singh, D. K., Alsharif, M. H., & Kim, M. K. (2024). Enhanced MPPT Approach for Grid-Integrated Solar PV System: Simulation and Experimental Study.
- Khan, M. K., Zafar, M. H., Riaz, T., Mansoor, M., & Akhtar, N. (2024). Enhancing Efficient Solar Energy Harvesting: A Process-in-Loop Investigation of MPPT Control with a Novel Stochastic Algorithm.
- Angelov, P. P., Soares, E. A., Jiang, R., Arnold, N. I., & Atkinson, P. M. (2021). Explainable Artificial Intelligence: An Analytical Review.
- Sravani, M., & Sobhan, P. V. S. (2025). Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based Controller for DC-Link Voltage Regulation and Voltage Sag Compensation in a Solar PV-Integrated UPQC System.
- Roy, B., Adhikari, S., Datta, S., Devi, K. J., Devi, A. D., & Ustun, T. S. (2024). Harnessing Deep Learning for Enhanced MPPT in Solar PV Systems: An LSTM Approach Using Real-World Data.
- Nguyen, H. P., Nguyen, T. T., Le, M. P., & Tran, T. N. (2025). Experimental Platforms Consisting of Software-in-the-Loop, Hardware-in-the-Loop and Power-Hardware-in-the-Loop for Developing an MPPT Charge Controller for Photovoltaic System.
- Bakare, M. S., Abdulkarim, A., Shuaibu, A. N., & Muhamad, M. M. (2025). Enhancing Solar Power Efficiency with Hybrid GEP–ANFIS MPPT Under Dynamic Weather Conditions.
- Dennai, M. Y., Tedjini, H., & Nasri, A. (2024). Comparative Assessment of P&O, PSO Sliding Mode, and PSO-ANFIS Controller MPPT for Microgrid Dynamics.
- Gorzałczany, M. B., & Rudziński, F. (2024). Energy Consumption Prediction in Residential Buildings—An Accurate and Interpretable Machine Learning Approach Combining Fuzzy Systems with Evolutionary Optimization.
- Samano-Ortega, V., Padilla-Medina, A., Bravo-Sánchez, M., Rodriguez-Segura, E., Jimenez-Garibay, A., & Martinez-Nolasco, J. (2020). Hardware in the Loop Platform for Testing Photovoltaic System Control.
- Phan, B. C., Lai, Y.-C., & Lin, C.-E. (2020). A Deep Reinforcement Learning-Based MPPT Control for PV Systems Under Partial Shading Conditions.
- Pan, Z., Zhang, H., Min, X., & Xu, Z. (2020). Vicarious Calibration Correction of Large FOV Sensor Using BRDF Model Based on UAV Angular Spectrum Measurements.
- Priyadarshi, N., Sanjeevikumar, P., Holm-Nielsen, J. B., Blaabjerg, F., & Bhaskar, M. S. (2020). An Experimental Estimation of Hybrid ANFIS–PSO-Based MPPT for PV Grid Integration Under Fluctuating Sun Irradiance.
- Younas, U., Kulaksiz, A. A., & Ali, Z. (2024). Deep Learning Stack LSTM-Based MPPT Control of Dual Stage 100 kWp Grid-Tied Solar PV System.
Solar photovoltaic (PV) capacity is expanding rapidly, yet real-world energy yield still hinges on how reliably
controllers track the maximum power point under disturbances such as partial shading, fast irradiance ramps, sensor noise,
and embedded hardware limits. This review evaluates three intelligence families for MPPT: Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy
Inference Systems (ANFIS), Deep Learning (DL), and Reinforcement Learning (RL)through a deployment lens rather than
simulation alone. Using a structured search (2018–2025) across major databases, we prioritised studies with processor-
/hardware-in-the-loop (PIL/HIL) or embedded MCU/FPGA validation, and judged methods on four discriminating metrics:
(i) global-peak hit rate under shading, (ii) convergence time and overshoot, (iii) steady-state power ripple, and (iv) edge
feasibility (number format, latency, resources), alongside interpretability and audit requirements. Findings show ANFIS as
the risk-adjusted frontrunner in non-benign conditions: compact, fixed-point designs consistently deliver millisecond-scale
settling and ~99–100% tracking in dynamic tests, while hybrids (e.g., ANFIS-PSO/GEP or with nonlinear scaffolds) further
suppress ripple and improve global-peak discovery. DL/RL can match or exceed ANFIS when rich sensing, compute
headroom, and mature ML governance exist, but their gains are contingent on data pipelines, quantisation/latency
engineering, safe exploration, and explainability. We recommend a SIL→PIL→HIL rollout, energy-weighted metrics under
standardised shading/ramp scripts, and deploying a lean, auditable ANFIS now graduating DL/RL where HIL-proven
advantages justify their operational complexity.