Authors :
Victor David Ihezukwu; Micheal Ayeni; Raphael Essiet; Emmanuel Chukwudum Odili
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3s4cj29k
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3efnb9c6
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov005
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
This study examines the adoption of Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) technologies in the oil and
gas industry. Primary data were collected from industry professionals using a structured questionnaire distributed to 760
participants, with 700 valid responses analysed using SPSS (version 27). Secondary sources supported and validated the
primary findings. The research focuses on three key areas: the perceived effectiveness of CCUS in reducing carbon
emissions, the economic implications of CCUS deployment, and the opportunities and challenges associated with
implementation. Inferential statistical techniques, including regression analysis and MANOVA, were applied to assess
relationships between CCUS adoption and industry perceptions. The results indicate a statistically significant, although
modest, positive relationship between CCUS adoption and perceived environmental and economic benefits. High capital
costs, regulatory uncertainty, and technical complexity were identified as major barriers to wider deployment. Key
opportunities include government incentives, innovation in capture and storage technologies, and increased industry
collaboration. Overall, the findings suggest that CCUS is recognised as a critical tool for decarbonisation and long-term
sustainability in the oil and gas sector. However, wider adoption will require stronger regulatory frameworks, financial
support mechanisms, and continued technological progress. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers,
industry stakeholders, and researchers seeking to accelerate low carbon innovation and strategic energy transition planning.
Keywords :
CCUS, Sustainable Development, Oil & Gas, Carbon Emission.
References :
- Adu, E., Zhang, Y., and Liu, D. (2019). Current situation of carbon dioxide capture, storage, and enhanced oil recovery in the oil and gas industry. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 97(5), 1048–1076.
- Bajpai, S., Shreyash, N., Singh, S., Memon, A. R., Sonker, M., Tiwary, S. K., and Biswas, S. (2022). Opportunities, challenges and the way ahead for carbon capture, utilization and sequestration by the hydrocarbon industry, toward a sustainable future. Energy Reports, 8, 15595–15616.
- Bazhenov, S., Chuboksarov, V., Maximov, A., and Zhdaneev, O. (2022). Technical and economic prospects of CCUS projects in Russia. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 33, e00452.
- Brown, K., Whittaker, S., Wilson, M., Srisang, W., Smithson, H. and Tontiwachwuthikul, P., 2017. The history and development of the IEA GHG Weyburn-Midale CO2 Monitoring and Storage Project in Saskatchewan, Canada (the world largest CO2 for EOR and CCS program). Petroleum, 3(1), pp.3-9.
- Carus, M. (2024). Utilization of C1 gases, impact on sustainability. In CO2 and CO as Feedstock, Sustainable Carbon Sources for the Circular Economy, 297–306. Cham, Springer.
- Chang, Y., Mu, H., Li, N., and Xu, N. (2024). Economic feasibility analysis of oil industry chain with CCUS technology. Population, Resources and Environmental Economics, 5(1), 1–5.
- Che, X., Yi, X., Dai, Z., Zhang, Z., and Zhang, Y. (2022). Application and development countermeasures of CCUS technology in China’s petroleum industry. Atmosphere, 13(11), 1757.
- Davoodi, S., Al-Shargabi, M., Wood, D. A., Rukavishnikov, V. S., and Minaev, K. M. (2023). Review of technological progress in carbon dioxide capture, storage, and utilization. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 205070. [verify journal and article number]
- Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. (2022). UK oil and gas sector employment and sites statistics.
- Deng, Q., Ling, X., Zhang, K., Tan, L., Qi, G., and Zhang, J. (2022). CCS and CCUS technologies, giving the oil and gas industry a green future. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 919330.
- Dziejarski, B., Krzyżyńska, R., and Andersson, K. (2023). Current status of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies in the global economy, a survey of technical assessment. Fuel, 342, 127776.
- Eide, L. I., Batum, M., Dixon, T., Elamin, Z., Graue, A., Hagen, S., and Vieira, R. A. M. (2019). Enabling large scale CCUS using offshore CO2 infrastructure developments, a review. Energies, 12(10), 1945.
- Garifullina, C. A., and Klimov, D. S. (2024). CCU technologies as a tool to achieve Scope and ESG goals. E3S Web of Conferences, 498, 01015.
- Gowd, S. C., Ganeshan, P., Vigneswaran, V. S., Hossain, M. S., Kumar, D., Rajendran, K., and Pugazhendhi, A. (2023). Economic perspectives and policy insights on CCUS for sustainable development. Science of The Total Environment, 163656.
- Guo, H., Lyu, X., Meng, E., Xu, Y., Zhang, M., Fu, H., and Song, K. (2022). CCUS in China, challenges and opportunities. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, D031S031R002.
- Haohao, L., Xiang, Y., Lei, Z., and Shuo, Z. (2024). Current status and challenges of CCUS technology development from a global perspective. Journal of Science, 3(1).
- Herzog, H.J., 2018. Carbon capture. MIT Press.
- Huang, L., Hou, Z., Fang, Y., Liu, J., and Shi, T. (2023). Evolution of CCUS technologies using LDA topic model and Derwent patent data. Energies, 16(6), 2556.
- Islam, R., Sohel, R. N., and Hasan, F. (2022). Role of oil and gas industry in meeting climate goals through CCUS. SPE Western Regional Meeting, D011S005R002.
- Jiang, K. and Ashworth, P., 2021. The development of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) research in China: A bibliometric perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 138, p.110521.
- Kawai, E., Ozawa, A., and Leibowicz, B. D. (2022). Role of carbon capture and utilization for decarbonization of the industrial sector, a case study of Japan. Applied Energy, 328, 120183.
- Kirli, M. S., and Fahrioglu, M. (2019). Sustainable development of Turkey, deployment of geothermal resources for CCUS. Energy Sources, Part A, 41(14), 1739–1751.
- Ku, A. Y., Cook, P. J., Hao, P., Li, X., Lemmon, J. P., Lockwood, T., and Xu, W. (2020). Cross regional drivers for CCUS deployment. Clean Energy, 4(3), 202–232.
- Li, Y. B. (2023). The challenge and opportunity of CCUS in the development of unconventional resources. Frontiers in Energy Research, 11, 1153929.
- Y. Li, R. Wang, Q. Zhao, and Z. Xue, “Technological advancement and industrialization path of Sinopec in carbon capture, utilization and storage, China,” Energy Geoscience, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 100107, 2022, doi:10.1016/j.engeos.2022.04.003.
- Lin, B., and Tan, Z. (2021). Impact of low oil price and carbon trading on CCUS project value. Journal of Cleaner Production, 298, 126768.
- Liu, E., Lu, X., and Wang, D. (2023). A systematic review of CCUS, status, progress and challenges. Energies, 16(6), 2865.
- Martin-Roberts, E., Scott, V., Flude, S., Johnson, G., Haszeldine, R. S., and Gilfillan, S. (2021). Carbon capture and storage at the end of a lost decade. One Earth, 4(11), 1569–1584.
- Medeiros Costa, H. K., Seabra, P. N., Arlota, C., and dos Santos, E. M. (2021). Sustainable development and its link to CCS technology, toward an equitable energy transition. In Carbon Capture and Storage in International Energy Policy and Law, 357–370. Elsevier.
- Mikunda, T., Brunner, L., Skylogianni, E., Monteiro, J., Rycroft, L., and Kemper, J. (2021). CCS and the sustainable development goals. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 108, 103318.
- Nath, F., Mahmood, M.N. and Yousuf, N., 2024. Recent advances in CCUS: A critical review on technologies, regulatory aspects and economics. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 238, p.212726.
- Olabi, A. G., Obaideen, K., Elsaid, K., Wilberforce, T., Sayed, E. T., Maghrabie, H. M., and Abdelkareem, M. A. (2022). Assessment of pre combustion carbon capture contribution into SDGs using novel indicators. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 153, 111710.
- Olfe-Kräutlein, B. (2020). Advancing CCU technologies pursuant to the SDGs, a challenge for policy making. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8, 198.
- Peres, C. B., Resende, P. M., Nunes, L. J., and Morais, L. C. D. (2022). Advances in CCU technologies, a comprehensive review and CO2 mitigation potential analysis. Clean Technologies, 4(4), 1193–1207.
- Rakhiemah, A. N., and Xu, Y. (2022). Economic viability of full chain CCUS-EOR in Indonesia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 179, 106069.
- Ringrose, P. (2016). CO2 capture and storage, developing industrial scale CCS projects in Norway. 78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016, 2016(1), 1–5.
- Rocco, M. V., Ferrer, R. J. F., and Colombo, E. (2018). Understanding the energy metabolism of world economies through joint production and consumption energy accounts. Applied Energy, 211, 590–603.
- Swift, M., and Al Khowaiter, A. (2023). Briefing, SDG 13 and the carbon capture boom. Foundations, 2, 2.
- Tapia, J. F. D., Lee, J. Y., Ooi, R. E., Foo, D. C., and Tan, R. R. (2018). A review of optimisation and decision-making models for planning CCUS systems. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 13, 1–15.
- Terdal, R. M., Steeghs, N., and Walter, C. (2022). CCUS, how to commercialize a business with no revenue. SPE Canadian Energy Technology Conference, D011S009R001.
- Truong, T. H., Lin, B. W., Lo, C. H., Tung, C. P., and Chao, C. W. (2024). Possible pathways for low carbon transitions, investigating the efforts of oil companies in CCUS. Energy Strategy Reviews, 54, 101421.
- Vishal, V., Chandra, D., Singh, U., and Verma, Y. (2021). Initial opportunities and key challenges for CCUS deployment in India at scale. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105829.
- Wang, Z., Li, S., Jin, Z., Li, Z., Liu, Q., and Zhang, K. (2023). Oil and gas pathway to net-zero, review and outlook. Energy Strategy Reviews, 45, 101048.
- Wu, L., Hou, Z., Xie, Y., Luo, Z., Huang, L., Wu, X., Luo, J., Fang, Y., Chen, Q., Sun, W., and Lüddeke, C. T. (2023). Carbon capture, circular utilization, and sequestration, a multifunctional technology coupling underground biomethanation with geothermal energy production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 426, 139225.
- Yan, L., Hu, J., Fang, Q., Xia, X., Lei, B., and Deng, Q. (2023). Eco development of oil and gas industry, CCUS-EOR technology. Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 1063042.
- Yao, J., Han, H., Yang, Y., Song, Y., and Li, G. (2023). Recent progress of CCUS in China, a review. Applied Sciences, 13(2), 1169.
- Yoro, K.O. and Daramola, M.O., 2020. CO2 emission sources, greenhouse gases, and the global warming effect. In Advances in carbon capture (pp. 3-28). Woodhead Publishing.
- Yasemi, S., Khalili, Y., Sanati, A., and Bagheri, M. (2023). CCUS, application in the oil and gas industry. Sustainability, 15(19), 14486.
- Zhang, K., Lau, H. C., and Chen, Z. (2022). Extension of CO2 storage life in the Sleipner CCS project by reservoir pressure management. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 108, 104814.
- Zhao, X., Bai, Y., and Ding, L. (2022). Financing Incentive Mechanisms for Carbon Capture and Storage Technology (CCS) Commercialization. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 24(1), pp.24-38.
This study examines the adoption of Carbon Capture, Utilisation, and Storage (CCUS) technologies in the oil and
gas industry. Primary data were collected from industry professionals using a structured questionnaire distributed to 760
participants, with 700 valid responses analysed using SPSS (version 27). Secondary sources supported and validated the
primary findings. The research focuses on three key areas: the perceived effectiveness of CCUS in reducing carbon
emissions, the economic implications of CCUS deployment, and the opportunities and challenges associated with
implementation. Inferential statistical techniques, including regression analysis and MANOVA, were applied to assess
relationships between CCUS adoption and industry perceptions. The results indicate a statistically significant, although
modest, positive relationship between CCUS adoption and perceived environmental and economic benefits. High capital
costs, regulatory uncertainty, and technical complexity were identified as major barriers to wider deployment. Key
opportunities include government incentives, innovation in capture and storage technologies, and increased industry
collaboration. Overall, the findings suggest that CCUS is recognised as a critical tool for decarbonisation and long-term
sustainability in the oil and gas sector. However, wider adoption will require stronger regulatory frameworks, financial
support mechanisms, and continued technological progress. These insights provide valuable guidance for policymakers,
industry stakeholders, and researchers seeking to accelerate low carbon innovation and strategic energy transition planning.
Keywords :
CCUS, Sustainable Development, Oil & Gas, Carbon Emission.