Authors : Kothwala Dr. Deveshkumar Mahendralal; Pathak Vipulkumar; Barik Saurabh Kumar; Vashi Vaidehi Ketan

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/38v66wxs

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25may1157

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death globally, underscoring the importance of surgical interventions such as vascular grafts in restoring blood flow and managing vascular diseases. Polyester vascular grafts have been a staple in CVD treatment for over six decades due to their mechanical durability and ease of handling. However, issues like thrombogenicity, compliance mismatch, and susceptibility to infection persist, prompting the need for innovation in graft design and material properties. The review focuses on examining the evolution of polyester vascular grafts, addressing limitations, and exploring advanced modifications to improve clinical outcomes. This review aims to evaluate the development, clinical applications, and material advancements associated with polyester vascular grafts. It will analyze their mechanical and biological performance, compare them with other graft types, and explore potential improvements in design and surface modification to address current limitations. While the review does not provide specific details on the literature search strategy, it likely involved synthesizing existing research from clinical studies, material science advancements, and innovations in graft design. Key references are included to support the comparative analysis of polyester grafts and emerging technologies. Polyester vascular grafts, especially in large-diameter applications, offer long-term patency and mechanical reliability. However, they face challenges such as infection, thrombogenicity, and mechanical mismatch with native vessels. Recent advancements, including hybrid grafts, drug-eluting coatings, and electrospun nanofiber scaffolds, are explored for their potential to enhance graft integration, biocompatibility, and resistance to microbial colonization. Furthermore, emerging technologies like personalized 3D-printed grafts and smart grafts with biosensors hold promise for future vascular therapies. Polyester vascular grafts remain crucial in vascular surgery, yet significant room for improvement exists. Future advancements, particularly in hybrid, bioactive, and smart grafts, could address current challenges, offering more personalized and effective solutions for complex vascular conditions. The ongoing integration of material sciences, tissue engineering, and personalized medicine will likely drive the next generation of vascular grafts.

Keywords : Polyester Vascular Grafts, Cardiovascular Diseases, Graft Innovation, Thrombogenicity, Biocompatibility, Smart Grafts.

References :

1. Berger K, Sauvage LR. Long-term patency of arterial grafts. Importance of an intact endothelial lining. Surgery. 1981 May;89(5):597-609.
2. Sauvage LR, Wood SJ. The evolution and development of the Dacron vascular prosthesis. Surg Clin North Am. 1974;54(1):183-96.
3. Abbott WM, Megerman J, Hasson JE, L'Italien G, Warnock DF. Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5(2):376-82.
4. Clagett GP, Valentine RJ. Vascular Grafts. In: Cronenwett JL, Johnston KW, editors. Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2010. p. 801–15.
5. Berger K, Sauvage LR. Compliance of vascular prostheses. J Surg Res. 1981;31(2):120-7.
6. Zilla P, Bezuidenhout D, Human P. Prosthetic vascular grafts: wrong models, wrong questions and no healing. Biomaterials. 2007;28(34):5009-27.
7. Chakfé N, Dieval F, Sondag B, et al. In vitro resistance of silver-coated vascular prostheses to microbial colonization. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(2):313-20.
8. Seifu DG, Purnama A, Mequanint K, Mantovani D. Small-diameter vascular tissue engineering. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2013;10(7):410-21.
9. Cho SW, Lim SH, Kim IK, et al. Small-diameter blood vessels engineered with bone marrow-derived cells. Ann Surg. 2005;241(3):506-15.
10. Wang X, Lin P, Yao Q, Chen C. Development of small-diameter vascular grafts. World J Surg. 2007;31(4):682-9.
11. L'Heureux N, McAllister TN, de la Fuente LM. Tissue-engineered blood vessel for adult arterial revascularization. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(14):1451-3.
12. Hwang CW, Wu D, Edelman ER. Physiological transport forces govern drug distribution for stent-based delivery. Circulation. 2001;104(5):600-5.
13. Bosiers M, Deloose K, Verbist J, et al. Heparin-bonded ePTFE vascular grafts in femoropopliteal bypass surgery: midterm results. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43(2):313-8.
14. Conte MS. The ideal small arterial substitute: a search for the Holy Grail? FASEB J. 1998;12(1):43-5.
15. Chlupác J, Filová E, Bacáková L. Blood vessel replacement: 50 years of development and tissue engineering paradigms in vascular surgery. Physiol Res. 2009;58(Suppl 2):S119-39.
16. Kakisis JD, Liapis CD, Breuer C, Sumpio BE. Artificial blood vessel: the Holy Grail of peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2005;41(2):349-54.
17. Sarkar S, Sales KM, Hamilton G, Seifalian AM. Addressing thrombogenicity in vascular graft construction. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007 Feb;82(1):100-8.
18. Mehta M, Taggert JB, Roddy SP, Paty PS, Kreienberg PB, Darling RC, et al. Outcome of polyester versus ePTFE grafts for femoral-popliteal bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan;47(1):147-53.
19. Duffy GP, Fishbein MC. Complications of vascular prostheses. In: Cronenwett JL, Johnston KW, editors. Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2010. p. 1096–110.
20. Chiesa R, Melissano G, Tshomba Y, Marrocco-Trischitta MM, Civilini E, Setacci F. Aortic aneurysm repair with Gelweave and Intergard vascular prostheses. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2004 Jun;45(3):227-36.
21. Ziegler KR, Deeb GM, Fowl RJ, Amendt KJ, Brooks JD, Graham LM. Impregnation of Dacron vascular prostheses with antibiotics: laboratory investigation and clinical implications. J Vasc Surg. 1993 Mar;17(3):538-45.
22. Madras PN, Pepin M, Leclerc G, Cartier R. Knitted versus woven Dacron aortic grafts: a comparative study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988 Aug;46(2):151-6.
23. Dong Z, Wang Q, Sun Y, Wang Y, Lin H, Zhang WJ. Electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds for enhancing vascular graft patency. Acta Biomater. 2019 Sep;94:64–80.
24. Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Ascer E, White-Flores S, Samson RH, Scher LA. Six-year prospective multicenter randomized comparison of autologous saphenous vein and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in infrainguinal arterial reconstructions. J Vasc Surg. 1986 Nov;3(5):104-14.
25. Dardik H, Wengerter K, Qin F, Pangilinan AJ, Silvestri F. Comparative patency of polyester vs. ePTFE femoral-popliteal bypass grafts: results of a multicenter trial. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Jul;36(1):65-72.
26. Precedence Research. Vascular Grafts Market Size, Share, Trends, Growth, Report 2024‑2033. Updated 2024 [cited 2025 Apr 24]. Available from: https://www.precedenceresearch.com/vascular-grafts-market
27. Abbott WM, Megerman J, Hasson JE, L'Italien G, Warnock DF. Effect of compliance mismatch on vascular graft patency. J Vasc Surg. 1987;5(2):376–382.
28. Berger K, Sauvage LR. Healing of arterial prostheses in man: Its incompleteness. Ann Surg. 1981;193(5):579–584.
29. Clowes AW, Neville RF, Reidy MA. Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. II. Inhibition of smooth muscle growth by heparin. Lab Invest. 1983;49(2):208–215.
30. Bashir MR, Ferral H. A guide for endovascular stent graft selection in the femoropopliteal arteries. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013;30(3):262–271.
31. Mehta M, Veith FJ, Darling RC, Roddy SP, Sternbach Y, Ozsvath KJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of a heparin-bonded Dacron vascular graft for infrainguinal bypass: early results. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(2):402–408.
32. Sottiurai VS, Yao JS, Flinn WR, Batson RC. Intimal hyperplasia and neointima: an ultrastructural analysis of thrombosed grafts in humans. Surgery. 1983;93(5):809–817.
33. Wang Z, Cui Y, Wang J, Yang X, Wu Y, Wang K, et al. The effect of a biomimetic nanofibrous PET vascular graft on vascular regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35(22):5700–5710.