Authors :
Mrunal G. Vekhande; Sushant Sawant; Dr. Deepanjana Dass; Dr. Savitri Mandavi; Dr. Prakash Khandelwal
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/crm9be5e
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2yf94m5n
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL727
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Introduction:
The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has
significant implications for patient safety and public
health. In 1937, the introduction of sulphanilamide for
streptococcal infections marked a pivotal moment in drug
safety. Present study assessed the pattern, causality and
severity of the ADRs reported from a tertiary referral
centre.
Materials and Methods:
Study conducted at the Mahatma Gandhi Mission
Medical College and Hospital Kamothe Navi Mumbai
recorded the pattern of ADRs between January 2021 and
December 2022. The data was collected from the ADR
Monitoring Center using the suspected ADR reporting
form, version 1.4 of IPC, Ghaziabad, India. The suspected
ADR forms were assessed to understand the pattern of
ADRs regarding the completeness score of the ADR form.
Findings and Discussion:
A total of 111 ADRs were recorded, with 43.24% of
cases falling within the age range of 21 to 40.
Antimicrobial medications were the main culprits behind
the majority of ADRs reported by the departments of
dermatology and general medicine. Rashes, edema, and
urticaria are among the skin-related symptoms among the
most frequently reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
72.9% of instances were classified as mild, according to
severity assessment, whereas 57.65% of ADRs were found
to be likely.
Conclusions:
Because ADRs represent a serious threat to public
health, our study highlights the significance of
pharmacovigilance in tracking and preventing them.
Databases on a national and international level are
enhanced by systematic, regular reporting and
monitoring of ADRs. In order to raise awareness of ADRs
among patients and healthcare professionals,
spontaneous reporting is still essential.
Keywords :
Adverse Drug Reactions, Pharmacovigilance, Causality Assessment, Severity Assessment, Completeness Score.
References :
- Chauhan S. Pharmacovigilance-A drug safety monitoring tool. J Pharmacovigil Drug Res. 2021;2:14-19.
- Singh KN, Kanase HR. Pharmacovigilance programme of India: The beginning, current status and recent progress. Adv Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;6:219.
- Pharmacovigilance Programme of India [Internet]. [cited 2023 Aug 29]. Available from: https://ipc.gov.in/PvPI/pv_home.html
- Gupta AK. A Retrospective Descriptive Study of Adverse Drug Reaction Monitoring in Tertiary Care Hospital. J Med Acad 2020;3(2):54–58.
- Gadhade JB, Hiray RS, Aherkar RY, Shah KU. Pharmacovigilance programme of India: revival of the renaissance. Int J Basic Clin Pharmcol. 2018;7:2281-2285.
- Kuchya SK, Shrivastava S. Comparison of methods of submission of suspected adverse drug reactions to the ADR monitoring centers in India. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2017;6:2032-2037.
- Thakare VS, Kavitha VD, Langade D. Prospective observational study to evaluate adverse drug reactions pattern in a tertiary level teaching hospital. Nat J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2019;9(5):434-437.
- Raina RS, Kaushal SB. Retrospective analysis on adverse drug reactions prevalence in the female population of Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian J Pharm Pharmacol. 2018;5:40-43.
- Ankitha L, Ramesh H. A retrospective study of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care center. Int J Basic Clin Pharmacol. 2020;9: 611-615.
- Adhikari A, Bhattacharjee N, Bhattacharya S, Indu R, Ray M. Evaluation of adverse drug reactions in tertiary care hospital of Kolkata, West Bengal, India. J Young Pharm. 2017;9:311-314.
- Prashanthi B, Modi H, Kalagara D. Adverse drug reactions (ADR’S) monitoring at tertiary care Hospital. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2019;9:195-198.
- Nirumalla M, Sanapala S, Bobbili SV, Unni VK, Prathyusha P. A prospective study of adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care hospital in patients. Pharm Innov. 2019;8:277-286.
Introduction:
The incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has
significant implications for patient safety and public
health. In 1937, the introduction of sulphanilamide for
streptococcal infections marked a pivotal moment in drug
safety. Present study assessed the pattern, causality and
severity of the ADRs reported from a tertiary referral
centre.
Materials and Methods:
Study conducted at the Mahatma Gandhi Mission
Medical College and Hospital Kamothe Navi Mumbai
recorded the pattern of ADRs between January 2021 and
December 2022. The data was collected from the ADR
Monitoring Center using the suspected ADR reporting
form, version 1.4 of IPC, Ghaziabad, India. The suspected
ADR forms were assessed to understand the pattern of
ADRs regarding the completeness score of the ADR form.
Findings and Discussion:
A total of 111 ADRs were recorded, with 43.24% of
cases falling within the age range of 21 to 40.
Antimicrobial medications were the main culprits behind
the majority of ADRs reported by the departments of
dermatology and general medicine. Rashes, edema, and
urticaria are among the skin-related symptoms among the
most frequently reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
72.9% of instances were classified as mild, according to
severity assessment, whereas 57.65% of ADRs were found
to be likely.
Conclusions:
Because ADRs represent a serious threat to public
health, our study highlights the significance of
pharmacovigilance in tracking and preventing them.
Databases on a national and international level are
enhanced by systematic, regular reporting and
monitoring of ADRs. In order to raise awareness of ADRs
among patients and healthcare professionals,
spontaneous reporting is still essential.
Keywords :
Adverse Drug Reactions, Pharmacovigilance, Causality Assessment, Severity Assessment, Completeness Score.