Authors : Oyejide Timothy Odofin; Nurudeen Yemi Hussain; Sunday Adeola Oladosu

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3zrz4s56

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mry8rx8p

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25sep878

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Enterprise software development relies on diverse tools and knowledge sources, such as issue trackers (e.g., Jira), version control systems (e.g., GitHub, Bitbucket), and documentation platforms (e.g., Confluence). Developers often encounter context fragmentation, cognitive overload, and operational inefficiencies due to navigating these disparate systems. While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has advanced document-based question answering, most existing solutions fail to integrate live operational tools or orchestrate workflows across multiple sources. We introduce AgentHub, an open-source AI agent framework that seamlessly combines semantic knowledge retrieval with tool orchestration. This enables a unified conversational interface for querying, correlating, and acting upon enterprise data. AgentHub continuously synchronizes knowledge sources into a vector database, integrates live APIs from tools like Jira, GitHub, and Confluence, and supports secure action execution (e.g., merging approved pull requests). The framework's document ingestion process is versatile, supporting a wide range of sources including Confluence, web URLs, S3, Google Drive, Azure Blob Storage, and local file systems, with provisions for end-to-end encryption and exclusion of sensitive files. In this paper, we detail the system architecture, implementation, and insights from early deployments, highlighting AgentHub’s ability to minimize context switching, enhance workflow efficiency, preserve institutional knowledge, and facilitate AI-driven enterprise operations.

Keywords : Multi-Agent Systems, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, Enterprise AI, Workflow Automation, Vector Database, Open- Source Software.

References :

1. Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., & Wilhite, S. (2004). A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 175-182). ACM.
2. Mark, G., Gudith, D., & Klocke, U. (2008). The cost of interrupted work: More speed and stress. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 107-110). ACM.
3. Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., ... & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459-9474.
4. Karpukhin, V., Oğuz, B., Min, S., Lewis, P., Wu, L., Edunov, S., ... & Yih, W. T. (2020). Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (pp. 6769-6781). Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. GitHub. (2024). GitHub Copilot Chat Documentation. Retrieved from https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/using-github-copilot/copilot-chat
6. Lin, L., Jin, Y., Han, H., & Ma, X. (2024). MAO: A Framework for Process Model Generation with Multi-Agent Orchestration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.01916.
7. Arsanjani, A. (2025). Multi-Agent Software Engineering: Orchestrating the Future of AI in Financial Services (Part 2). Medium. Retrieved from https://dr-arsanjani.medium.com/multi-agent-sofwtare-engineering-orchestrating-the-future-of-ai-in-financial-services-part-2-d14cee8a4d54
8. OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774.
9. Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019). Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (pp. 3982-3992). Association for Computational Linguistics.