⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



AI-Based Predictive Maintenance for EV Chargers Using Real-World Operational and Fault-History Data


Authors : Matthew Busayo Olanrewaju; Cornelius Chukwujekwu Okafor; Emmanuel Ayodeji Afolabi

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3z45vpk2

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep157

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Reliable electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure is increasingly important as charging networks expand. The study developed an explainable machine-learning framework to determine if a charger would document a maintenancerelevant fault in the next three calendar days. A Chinese dataset of 441,077 charging sessions from 92 chargers was transformed into a continuous charger-day panel with 16 operational, environmental, fault-history and rolling-workload predictors. The performance of Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost and LightGBM was compared via leakagecontrolled temporal validation, operating-threshold selection on the independent validation period, and final evaluation on a later temporal holdout.

Keywords : Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure; Predictive Maintenance; Fault Prediction; Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Logistic Regression; Temporal Validation.

References :

  1. Aas, K., Jullum, M., & Løland, A. (2021). Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley values. Artificial Intelligence, 298, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2021.103502
  2. Almaghrebi, A., Aljuheshi, F., Rafaie, M., James, K., & Alahmad, M. (2020). Data-driven charging demand prediction at public charging stations using supervised machine learning regression methods. Energies, 13(16), 4231. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13164231
  3. Barredo Arrieta, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., García, S., Gil-López, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2020). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58, 82–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
  4. Cao, T., Xu, Y., Liu, G., Tao, S., Tang, W., & Sun, H. (2024). Feature-enhanced deep learning method for electric vehicle charging demand probabilistic forecasting of charging station. Applied Energy, 371, 123751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123751
  5. Carvalho, T. P., Soares, F. A. A. M. N., Vita, R., Francisco, R. da P., Basto, J. P., & Alcalá, S. G. S. (2019). A systematic literature review of machine learning methods applied to predictive maintenance. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106024
  6. Cummins, L., Sommers, A., Ramezani, S. B., Mittal, S., Jabour, J., Seale, M., & Rahimi, S. (2024). Explainable predictive maintenance: A survey of current methods, challenges and opportunities. IEEE Access, 12, 57574–57602. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3391130
  7. Dalzochio, J., Kunst, R., Pignaton, E., Binotto, A., Sanyal, S., Favilla, J., & Barbosa, J. (2020). Machine learning and reasoning for predictive maintenance in Industry 4.0: Current status and challenges. Computers in Industry, 123, 103298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103298
  8. Funke, S. Á., Sprei, F., Gnann, T., & Plötz, P. (2019). How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77, 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.024
  9. Ge, X., Shi, L., Fu, Y., Muyeen, S. M., Zhang, Z., & He, H. (2020). Data-driven spatial-temporal prediction of electric vehicle load profile considering charging behavior. Electric Power Systems Research, 187, 106469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106469
  10. Gilanifar, M., & Parvania, M. (2021). Clustered multi-node learning of electric vehicle charging flexibility. Applied Energy, 282, 116125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116125
  11. Hoffmann, M. W., Wildermuth, S., Gitzel, R., Boyaci, A., Gebhardt, J., Kaul, H., Amihai, I., Forg, B., Suriyah, M., Leibfried, T., Stich, V., Hicking, J., Bremer, M., Kaminski, L., Beverungen, D., zur Heiden, P., & Tornede, T. (2020). Integration of novel sensors and machine learning for predictive maintenance in medium voltage switchgear to enable the energy and mobility revolutions. Sensors, 20(7), 2099. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20072099
  12. Hsu, Y.-M., Ji, D.-Y., Miller, M., Jia, X., & Lee, J. (2023). Intelligent maintenance of electric vehicle battery charging systems and networks: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.36001/ijphm.2023.v14i3.3130
  13. Izquierdo Gómez, P., Barragán Moreno, A., Lin, J., & Dragičević, T. (2022). Data-driven thermal modelling for anomaly detection in electric vehicle charging stations. In 2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC) (pp. 1005–1010). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC53557.2022.9813767
  14. Lei, Y., Li, N., Guo, L., Li, N., Yan, T., & Lin, J. (2018). Machinery health prognostics: A systematic review from data acquisition to RUL prediction. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 104, 799–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.11.016
  15. Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., DeGrave, A., Prutkin, J. M., Nair, B., Katz, R., Himmelfarb, J., Bansal, N., & Lee, S.-I. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9
  16. Nademi, H., & Zhang, B. (2020). A learning-based supervisory control architecture for electric vehicle charging system paired with energy storages. In 2020 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC) (pp. 621–625). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ITEC48692.2020.9161572
  17. Ng, M.-F., Zhao, J., Yan, Q., Conduit, G. J., & Seh, Z. W. (2020). Predicting the state of charge and health of batteries using data-driven machine learning. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0156-7
  18. Olanrewaju, M. B., & Aderinko, H. A. (2026a). State-of-charge driven charging behaviour at public EV chargers in the United Kingdom: An empirical study [Preprint]. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6872978
  19. Olanrewaju, M. B., & Aderinko, H. A. (2026b). Data-driven optimization of hybrid solar photovoltaic (PV) and battery energy storage systems (BESS) for electric vehicle charging using a hybrid data approach. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 11(6), 2830–2847. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jun1757
  20. Pang, G., Shen, C., Cao, L., & van den Hengel, A. (2021). Deep learning for anomaly detection: A review. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(2), Article 38, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439950
  21. Sakwa, M., Nespoli, A., Matrone, S., Leva, S., Guerini, A., Demartini, A., & Ogliari, E. (2024). Electric vehicle supply equipment monitoring and early fault detection through autoencoders. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 40, 101497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2024.101497
  22. Shahriar, S., Al-Ali, A. R., Osman, A. H., Dhou, S., & Nijim, M. (2020). Machine learning approaches for EV charging behavior: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 168980–168993. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023388
  23. Shang, Y., Li, D., Li, Y., & Li, S. (2025). Explainable spatiotemporal multi-task learning for electric vehicle charging demand prediction. Applied Energy, 384, 125460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125460
  24. Shuvo, S. S., & Yilmaz, Y. (2020). Predictive maintenance for increasing EV charging load in distribution power system. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartGridComm47815.2020.9303021
  25. Sun, D., Ou, Q., Yao, X., Gao, S., Wang, Z., Ma, W., & Li, W. (2020). Integrated human-machine intelligence for EV charging prediction in 5G smart grid. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2020, Article 139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13638-020-01752-y
  26. Susto, G. A., Schirru, A., Pampuri, S., McLoone, S., & Beghi, A. (2015). Machine learning for predictive maintenance: A multiple classifier approach. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11(3), 812–820. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2014.2349359
  27. Ullah, I., Liu, K., Yamamoto, T., Zahid, M., & Jamal, A. (2023). Modeling of machine learning with SHAP approach for electric vehicle charging station choice behavior prediction. Travel Behaviour and Society, 31, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.006
  28. Wang, H., Wang, N., Li, Y., & Tang, X. (2025). A fault prediction model for electric vehicle charging equipment based on adaptive dynamic thresholds. SAE Technical Paper 2025-01-8117. SAE International. https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8117
  29. Zhao, R., Yan, R., Chen, Z., Mao, K., Wang, P., & Gao, R. X. (2019). Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 115, 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2018.05.050
  30. Zonta, T., da Costa, C. A., da Rosa Righi, R., de Lima, M. J., da Trindade, E. S., & Li, G. P. (2020). Predictive maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 150, 106889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106889.

Reliable electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure is increasingly important as charging networks expand. The study developed an explainable machine-learning framework to determine if a charger would document a maintenancerelevant fault in the next three calendar days. A Chinese dataset of 441,077 charging sessions from 92 chargers was transformed into a continuous charger-day panel with 16 operational, environmental, fault-history and rolling-workload predictors. The performance of Logistic Regression, Random Forest, XGBoost and LightGBM was compared via leakagecontrolled temporal validation, operating-threshold selection on the independent validation period, and final evaluation on a later temporal holdout.

Keywords : Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure; Predictive Maintenance; Fault Prediction; Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Logistic Regression; Temporal Validation.

Paper Submission Last Date
30 - September - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe