Authors :
Julius Albert Tommy Hai; Ebenezer Tetteh; Matthew Oman-Amoako
Volume/Issue :
Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/3xmv3zk3
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep495
Note : A published paper may take 4-5
working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and
ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Perishable-goods logistics faces intertwined uncertainty in demand, supply, product condition, temperature, and
disruption, while limited shelf life narrows the time available for response. This critical integrative review examines how AI
enabled forecasting relates to supply-chain resilience and how predictive capability can be represented within resilience
measurement. Thirty English-language scholarly studies published between 2020 and 2026 contributed to the final synthesis
across predictive applications, operational use, disruption response, resilience mechanisms, measurement approaches, and
reported outcomes. The evidence shows that AI and machine-learning methods can predict demand, product quality and
marketability, temperature, and disruption-related conditions, but machine-learning performance varies by forecasting
task, data, horizon, and operating context and does not consistently exceed conventional methods. Evidence for predictive
performance and operational use is stronger than evidence linking prediction to observed resilience outcomes. The review
develops an evidence-grounded, conditional prediction-to-resilience pathway in which predictive capability produces
actionable information that may be converted through available response capacity into operational intervention, changes in
system behavior during disruption, and an observed resilience outcome. The analysis also distinguishes predictive measures
from response-capacity indicators and realized resilience measures, showing why forecast accuracy should not be treated as
resilience itself. The review concludes that predictive capability is an enabling information capability within a broader
resilience system. Stronger evidence of a prediction-to-resilience relationship would require studies that observe
implemented interventions during defined disruptions and measure resulting changes in continuity, loss, performance
decline, or recovery.
Keywords :
Artificial Intelligence; Perishable Goods Logistics; Supply Chain Resilience; Predictive Analytics; Resilience Measurement.
References :
- Adewumi, G., Dada, S. A., Azai, J. S., & Oware, E. (2024). A systematic review of strategies for enhancing pharmaceutical supply chain resilience in the U.S. International Medical Science Research Journal, 4(11), 961–972. https://doi.org/10.51594/imsrj.v4i11.1711
- Aljuneidi, T., Punia, S., Jebali, A., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2024). Forecasting and planning for a critical infrastructure sector during a pandemic: Empirical evidence from a food supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 317(3), 936–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.04.009
- Azzam, A., Gren, I.-M., & Andersson, H. (2023). Comparative resilience of US and EU meat processing to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Policy, 119, 102517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102517
- Birkmaier, A., Imeri, A., & Reiner, G. (2024). Improving supply chain planning for perishable food: Data-driven implications for waste prevention. Journal of Business Economics, 94, 891–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-024-01191-x
- Burgos, D., & Ivanov, D. (2021). Food retail supply chain resilience and the COVID-19 pandemic: A digital twin-based impact analysis and improvement directions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 152, 102412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102412
- Dong, W., Armstrong, K., Jin, M., Nimbalkar, S., Guo, W., Zhuang, J., & Cresko, J. (2022). A framework to quantify mass flow and assess food loss and waste in the US food supply chain. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00414-9
- Eiglsperger, J., Haselbeck, F., Stiele, V., Serrano, C. G., Lim-Trinh, K., Menrad, K., Hannus, T., & Grimm, D. G. (2024). Forecasting seasonally fluctuating sales of perishable products in the horticultural industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 249, 123438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123438
- Elashmawy, R., Doron, M., Kanjilal, R., Brecht, J. K., & Uysal, I. (2025). The digital cold chain: Sensor-driven product quality with AI. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 230, 113714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113714
- Gaye, A., Paflo, B. N., & Oware, D. A. (2025). Assessing the reliability of AI-driven predictive models in food safety risk management. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 6(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v6i2.1832
- Hosseini Shekarabi, S. A., Mavi, R. K., & Macau, F. R. (2025). An extended robust optimisation approach for sustainable and resilient supply chain network design: A case of perishable products. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 152, 110846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110846
- Jackson, I., Namdar, J., Sáenz, M. J., Elmquist, R. A., III, & Dávila Novoa, L. R. (2025). Revolutionize cold chain: An AI/ML driven approach to overcome capacity shortages. International Journal of Production Research, 63(6), 2190–2212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2398583
- Jauhar, S. K., Harinath, S., Krishnaswamy, V., & Paul, S. K. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence to improve the resilience of perishable product supply chains by leveraging customer characteristics. Annals of Operations Research, 354, 103–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06348-z
- Karan, E. P., Asgari, S., & Asadi, S. (2023). Resilience assessment of centralized and distributed food systems. Food Security, 15(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01321-9
- Karakoc, D. B., Konar, M., Puma, M. J., & Varshney, L. R. (2023). Structural chokepoints determine the resilience of agri-food supply chains in the United States. Nature Food, 4(7), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00793-y
- Lejarza, F., Pistikopoulos, I., & Baldea, M. (2021). A scalable real-time solution strategy for supply chain management of fresh produce: A Mexico-to-United States cross border study. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108212
- Loisel, J., Cornuéjols, A., Laguerre, O., Tardet, M., Cagnon, D., Duchesne de Lamotte, O., & Duret, S. (2022). Machine learning for temperature prediction in food pallet along a cold chain: Comparison between synthetic and experimental training dataset. Journal of Food Engineering, 335, 111156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111156
- Lopes Gerum, P. C., Herrero, J. R., Chung, M., & Giaretti, M. (2026). Improving high-frequency demand forecasts for omnichannel grocery retail. International Journal of Forecasting. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.10.003
- Miller, M. (2021). Identifying critical thresholds for resilient regional food flows: A case study from the U.S. Upper Midwest. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 684159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.684159
- Moynihan, E., Avraam, C., Siddiqui, S., & Neff, R. (2022). Optimization based modeling for the food supply chain's resilience to outbreaks. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 887819. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.887819
- Okonkwo, F. C., Akonor, B. G., & Adukpo, T. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in healthcare supply chain management: Enhancing resilience and efficiency in U.S. medical supply distribution. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, 12(1), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra19901
- Rao, J., Gao, S., Miller, M., & Morales, A. (2022). Measuring network resilience via geospatial knowledge graph: A case study of the US multi-commodity flow network. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Geospatial Knowledge Graphs (GeoKG '22) (pp. 1–9). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3557990.3567569
- Shrivastava, C., Berry, T., Cronje, P., Schudel, S., & Defraeye, T. (2022). Digital twins enable the quantification of the trade-offs in maintaining citrus quality and marketability in the refrigerated supply chain. Nature Food, 3(6), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00497-9
- Stevens, A. W., & Teal, J. (2024). Diversification and resilience of firms in the agrifood supply chain. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 106(2), 739–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12398
- Tack, J. B., Ala-Kokko, K., Gardner, G. E., Breneman, V., Arita, S., & Cooper, J. (2026). Climate-based measures of supply chain resilience. Agricultural Finance Review, 86(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-03-2024-0054
- Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
- Umoren, J., Agbadamasi, T. O., Adukpo, T. K., & Mensah, N. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence in healthcare supply chains: Strengthening resilience and minimizing waste. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, 12(2), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra20385
- Umoren, J., Utomi, E., & Adukpo, T. K. (2025). AI-powered predictive models for U.S. healthcare supply chains: Creating AI models to forecast and optimize supply chain. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(6), 784–795. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra22481
- Wang, R., Gan, X., Li, Q., & Yan, X. (2021). Solving a joint pricing and inventory control problem for perishables via deep reinforcement learning. Complexity, 2021, Article 6643131. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6643131
- Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
- Yang, C., Feng, Y., & Whinston, A. (2022). Dynamic pricing and information disclosure for fresh produce: An artificial intelligence approach. Production and Operations Management, 31(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13525
- Yim, H., & Dall'Erba, S. (2025). Impact of extreme weather events on the US domestic supply chain of food manufacturing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122(41), e2424715122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2424715122
- Yin, F., Lo, M. C., Mohamad, A. A., & Sin, K. Y. (2025). The impact of AI applications, information sharing, and supply chain resilience on agricultural supply chain performance. Journal of Data, Information and Management, 7, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-025-00155-2
Perishable-goods logistics faces intertwined uncertainty in demand, supply, product condition, temperature, and
disruption, while limited shelf life narrows the time available for response. This critical integrative review examines how AI
enabled forecasting relates to supply-chain resilience and how predictive capability can be represented within resilience
measurement. Thirty English-language scholarly studies published between 2020 and 2026 contributed to the final synthesis
across predictive applications, operational use, disruption response, resilience mechanisms, measurement approaches, and
reported outcomes. The evidence shows that AI and machine-learning methods can predict demand, product quality and
marketability, temperature, and disruption-related conditions, but machine-learning performance varies by forecasting
task, data, horizon, and operating context and does not consistently exceed conventional methods. Evidence for predictive
performance and operational use is stronger than evidence linking prediction to observed resilience outcomes. The review
develops an evidence-grounded, conditional prediction-to-resilience pathway in which predictive capability produces
actionable information that may be converted through available response capacity into operational intervention, changes in
system behavior during disruption, and an observed resilience outcome. The analysis also distinguishes predictive measures
from response-capacity indicators and realized resilience measures, showing why forecast accuracy should not be treated as
resilience itself. The review concludes that predictive capability is an enabling information capability within a broader
resilience system. Stronger evidence of a prediction-to-resilience relationship would require studies that observe
implemented interventions during defined disruptions and measure resulting changes in continuity, loss, performance
decline, or recovery.
Keywords :
Artificial Intelligence; Perishable Goods Logistics; Supply Chain Resilience; Predictive Analytics; Resilience Measurement.