⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



AI-Enabled Forecasting and Resilience Measurement in Perishable Goods Logistics: A Critical Integrative Review


Authors : Julius Albert Tommy Hai; Ebenezer Tetteh; Matthew Oman-Amoako

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3xmv3zk3

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep495

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Perishable-goods logistics faces intertwined uncertainty in demand, supply, product condition, temperature, and disruption, while limited shelf life narrows the time available for response. This critical integrative review examines how AI enabled forecasting relates to supply-chain resilience and how predictive capability can be represented within resilience measurement. Thirty English-language scholarly studies published between 2020 and 2026 contributed to the final synthesis across predictive applications, operational use, disruption response, resilience mechanisms, measurement approaches, and reported outcomes. The evidence shows that AI and machine-learning methods can predict demand, product quality and marketability, temperature, and disruption-related conditions, but machine-learning performance varies by forecasting task, data, horizon, and operating context and does not consistently exceed conventional methods. Evidence for predictive performance and operational use is stronger than evidence linking prediction to observed resilience outcomes. The review develops an evidence-grounded, conditional prediction-to-resilience pathway in which predictive capability produces actionable information that may be converted through available response capacity into operational intervention, changes in system behavior during disruption, and an observed resilience outcome. The analysis also distinguishes predictive measures from response-capacity indicators and realized resilience measures, showing why forecast accuracy should not be treated as resilience itself. The review concludes that predictive capability is an enabling information capability within a broader resilience system. Stronger evidence of a prediction-to-resilience relationship would require studies that observe implemented interventions during defined disruptions and measure resulting changes in continuity, loss, performance decline, or recovery.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence; Perishable Goods Logistics; Supply Chain Resilience; Predictive Analytics; Resilience Measurement.

References :

  1. Adewumi, G., Dada, S. A., Azai, J. S., & Oware, E. (2024). A systematic review of strategies for enhancing pharmaceutical supply chain resilience in the U.S. International Medical Science Research Journal, 4(11), 961–972. https://doi.org/10.51594/imsrj.v4i11.1711
  2. Aljuneidi, T., Punia, S., Jebali, A., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2024). Forecasting and planning for a critical infrastructure sector during a pandemic: Empirical evidence from a food supply chain. European Journal of Operational Research, 317(3), 936–952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.04.009
  3. Azzam, A., Gren, I.-M., & Andersson, H. (2023). Comparative resilience of US and EU meat processing to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Policy, 119, 102517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2023.102517
  4. Birkmaier, A., Imeri, A., & Reiner, G. (2024). Improving supply chain planning for perishable food: Data-driven implications for waste prevention. Journal of Business Economics, 94, 891–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-024-01191-x
  5. Burgos, D., & Ivanov, D. (2021). Food retail supply chain resilience and the COVID-19 pandemic: A digital twin-based impact analysis and improvement directions. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 152, 102412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102412
  6. Dong, W., Armstrong, K., Jin, M., Nimbalkar, S., Guo, W., Zhuang, J., & Cresko, J. (2022). A framework to quantify mass flow and assess food loss and waste in the US food supply chain. Communications Earth & Environment, 3(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00414-9
  7. Eiglsperger, J., Haselbeck, F., Stiele, V., Serrano, C. G., Lim-Trinh, K., Menrad, K., Hannus, T., & Grimm, D. G. (2024). Forecasting seasonally fluctuating sales of perishable products in the horticultural industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 249, 123438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123438
  8. Elashmawy, R., Doron, M., Kanjilal, R., Brecht, J. K., & Uysal, I. (2025). The digital cold chain: Sensor-driven product quality with AI. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 230, 113714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113714
  9. Gaye, A., Paflo, B. N., & Oware, D. A. (2025). Assessing the reliability of AI-driven predictive models in food safety risk management. Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 6(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.51594/csitrj.v6i2.1832
  10. Hosseini Shekarabi, S. A., Mavi, R. K., & Macau, F. R. (2025). An extended robust optimisation approach for sustainable and resilient supply chain network design: A case of perishable products. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 152, 110846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.110846
  11. Jackson, I., Namdar, J., Sáenz, M. J., Elmquist, R. A., III, & Dávila Novoa, L. R. (2025). Revolutionize cold chain: An AI/ML driven approach to overcome capacity shortages. International Journal of Production Research, 63(6), 2190–2212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2398583
  12. Jauhar, S. K., Harinath, S., Krishnaswamy, V., & Paul, S. K. (2025). Explainable artificial intelligence to improve the resilience of perishable product supply chains by leveraging customer characteristics. Annals of Operations Research, 354, 103–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06348-z
  13. Karan, E. P., Asgari, S., & Asadi, S. (2023). Resilience assessment of centralized and distributed food systems. Food Security, 15(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01321-9
  14. Karakoc, D. B., Konar, M., Puma, M. J., & Varshney, L. R. (2023). Structural chokepoints determine the resilience of agri-food supply chains in the United States. Nature Food, 4(7), 607–615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-023-00793-y
  15. Lejarza, F., Pistikopoulos, I., & Baldea, M. (2021). A scalable real-time solution strategy for supply chain management of fresh produce: A Mexico-to-United States cross border study. International Journal of Production Economics, 240, 108212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108212
  16. Loisel, J., Cornuéjols, A., Laguerre, O., Tardet, M., Cagnon, D., Duchesne de Lamotte, O., & Duret, S. (2022). Machine learning for temperature prediction in food pallet along a cold chain: Comparison between synthetic and experimental training dataset. Journal of Food Engineering, 335, 111156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111156
  17. Lopes Gerum, P. C., Herrero, J. R., Chung, M., & Giaretti, M. (2026). Improving high-frequency demand forecasts for omnichannel grocery retail. International Journal of Forecasting. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2025.10.003
  18. Miller, M. (2021). Identifying critical thresholds for resilient regional food flows: A case study from the U.S. Upper Midwest. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 5, 684159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2021.684159
  19. Moynihan, E., Avraam, C., Siddiqui, S., & Neff, R. (2022). Optimization based modeling for the food supply chain's resilience to outbreaks. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6, 887819. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.887819
  20. Okonkwo, F. C., Akonor, B. G., & Adukpo, T. K. (2025). Artificial intelligence in healthcare supply chain management: Enhancing resilience and efficiency in U.S. medical supply distribution. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, 12(1), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra19901
  21. Rao, J., Gao, S., Miller, M., & Morales, A. (2022). Measuring network resilience via geospatial knowledge graph: A case study of the US multi-commodity flow network. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Geospatial Knowledge Graphs (GeoKG '22) (pp. 1–9). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3557990.3567569
  22. Shrivastava, C., Berry, T., Cronje, P., Schudel, S., & Defraeye, T. (2022). Digital twins enable the quantification of the trade-offs in maintaining citrus quality and marketability in the refrigerated supply chain. Nature Food, 3(6), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00497-9
  23. Stevens, A. W., & Teal, J. (2024). Diversification and resilience of firms in the agrifood supply chain. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 106(2), 739–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12398
  24. Tack, J. B., Ala-Kokko, K., Gardner, G. E., Breneman, V., Arita, S., & Cooper, J. (2026). Climate-based measures of supply chain resilience. Agricultural Finance Review, 86(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-03-2024-0054
  25. Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
  26. Umoren, J., Agbadamasi, T. O., Adukpo, T. K., & Mensah, N. (2025). Leveraging artificial intelligence in healthcare supply chains: Strengthening resilience and minimizing waste. EPRA International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Studies, 12(2), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra20385
  27. Umoren, J., Utomi, E., & Adukpo, T. K. (2025). AI-powered predictive models for U.S. healthcare supply chains: Creating AI models to forecast and optimize supply chain. EPRA International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 11(6), 784–795. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra22481
  28. Wang, R., Gan, X., Li, Q., & Yan, X. (2021). Solving a joint pricing and inventory control problem for perishables via deep reinforcement learning. Complexity, 2021, Article 6643131. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6643131
  29. Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
  30. Yang, C., Feng, Y., & Whinston, A. (2022). Dynamic pricing and information disclosure for fresh produce: An artificial intelligence approach. Production and Operations Management, 31(1), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13525
  31. Yim, H., & Dall'Erba, S. (2025). Impact of extreme weather events on the US domestic supply chain of food manufacturing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122(41), e2424715122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2424715122
  32. Yin, F., Lo, M. C., Mohamad, A. A., & Sin, K. Y. (2025). The impact of AI applications, information sharing, and supply chain resilience on agricultural supply chain performance. Journal of Data, Information and Management, 7, 287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42488-025-00155-2

Perishable-goods logistics faces intertwined uncertainty in demand, supply, product condition, temperature, and disruption, while limited shelf life narrows the time available for response. This critical integrative review examines how AI enabled forecasting relates to supply-chain resilience and how predictive capability can be represented within resilience measurement. Thirty English-language scholarly studies published between 2020 and 2026 contributed to the final synthesis across predictive applications, operational use, disruption response, resilience mechanisms, measurement approaches, and reported outcomes. The evidence shows that AI and machine-learning methods can predict demand, product quality and marketability, temperature, and disruption-related conditions, but machine-learning performance varies by forecasting task, data, horizon, and operating context and does not consistently exceed conventional methods. Evidence for predictive performance and operational use is stronger than evidence linking prediction to observed resilience outcomes. The review develops an evidence-grounded, conditional prediction-to-resilience pathway in which predictive capability produces actionable information that may be converted through available response capacity into operational intervention, changes in system behavior during disruption, and an observed resilience outcome. The analysis also distinguishes predictive measures from response-capacity indicators and realized resilience measures, showing why forecast accuracy should not be treated as resilience itself. The review concludes that predictive capability is an enabling information capability within a broader resilience system. Stronger evidence of a prediction-to-resilience relationship would require studies that observe implemented interventions during defined disruptions and measure resulting changes in continuity, loss, performance decline, or recovery.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence; Perishable Goods Logistics; Supply Chain Resilience; Predictive Analytics; Resilience Measurement.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - October - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe