AI-Integrated Research Information Management: A Comparative Institutional Analysis


Authors : Dr. Anka Setty K.; Sudha H. T.

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 8 - August


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5xb5xwkp

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yc2xytxy

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25aug243

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : AI-Integrated Research Information Management Systems (RIMS) are increasingly pivotal in transforming how academic institutions organize, manage, and leverage scholarly information. This study, titled AI-Integrated Research Information Management: A Comparative Institutional Analysis, investigates the impact of Artificial Intelligence on enhancing RIMS functions such as metadata accuracy, researcher profiling, publication tracking, and overall research visibility. Adopting a mixed-method approach, the research combines qualitative insights from structured interviews with library professionals and system administrators, along with quantitative data drawn from institutional repositories, system usage reports, and RIMS documentation. The comparative analysis evaluates key parameters including system architecture, AI-driven functionalities, user engagement, and alignment with global indexing standards. Results reveal that institutions employing AI-enabled RIMS experience significant gains in automated metadata enrichment, efficient workflow management, and real-time data analytics, leading to improved discoverability and institutional research performance. However, the study also identifies persistent challenges such as limited technical infrastructure, integration complexities, and skill gaps among staff. These barriers impede the broader adoption of AI in research management. To address these issues, the study recommends actionable strategies such as fostering AI readiness, implementing targeted training programs, and developing supportive institutional policies. These measures are essential for sustainable and impactful integration of AI within RIMS across diverse academic contexts.

Keywords : AI-Integrated RIMS; Research Information Management; Metadata Accuracy; Institutional Repositories; Research Visibility; Academic Libraries; Comparative Study.

References :

  1. Beagrie, N., & Houghton, J. (2016). The Value and Impact of Research Data Infrastructure. JISC. https://www.jisc.ac.uk
  2. Borgman, C. L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. MIT Press.
  3. Chandran, D. (2017). AI applications in libraries and information services. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 37(6), 417–423.
  4. Chen, Y., Zhang, C., & Liu, H. (2020). Artificial intelligence in academic libraries: Applications and possibilities. Library Hi Tech, 38(1), 101–116.
  5. Cox, A. M., Kennan, M. A., Lyon, L., & Pinfield, S. (2017). Research data management in libraries: An exploratory study. Journal of Information Science, 43(2), 166–191.
  6. Council of Europe. (2019). Digital transformation and libraries. https://www.coe.int
  7. Crossref. (2022). Metadata best practices. https://www.crossref.org
  8. Dhanavandan, S., & Tamizhchelvan, M. (2013). Use of institutional repositories by research scholars in India. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 3(2), 45–54.
  9. Garg, R. G. (2021). Integration of AI tools for resource management in academic libraries. Library Progress (International), 41(2), 289–301.
  10. Gibbons, S. (2020). The future of research information systems. Information Services & Use, 40(1), 9–20.
  11. Google Scholar. (2023). Search engine indexing and AI algorithms. https://scholar.google.com
  12. Higher Education Commission of India. (2023). National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) – Methodology Report. https://www.nirfindia.org
  13. Joint Committee on AI Ethics in Research (2022). Ethical Use of AI in Academic Systems. Ministry of Education, India.
  14. Kumar, V., & Kumar, A. (2022). Role of AI in enhancing library services: A review. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 12(1), 22–32.
  15. Madhusudhan, M. (2019). Research data management and institutional repositories in Indian universities. Library Philosophy and Practice, Article 2332.
  16. Open AIRE. (2021). Open access, repositories, and research infrastructure. https://www.openaire.eu
  17. Sahoo, J., & Swain, D. K. (2021). Role of machine learning in research information systems. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(4), 301–307.
  18. Sahu, A. K. (2020). Analysing the effectiveness of research information management systems in Indian universities. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 10(2), 54–62.
  19. Shodhganga. (2023). Repository of Indian Theses. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in
  20. Subramanian, N. (2018). AI in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 9(3), 100–106.
  21. UGC. (2020). Guidelines for Academic Research Integrity and Research Misconduct. https://www.ugc.ac.in
  22. Vidyanidhi. (2021). Digital Library and Metadata Harvesting for Indian Universities. https://www.vidyanidhi.org.in

AI-Integrated Research Information Management Systems (RIMS) are increasingly pivotal in transforming how academic institutions organize, manage, and leverage scholarly information. This study, titled AI-Integrated Research Information Management: A Comparative Institutional Analysis, investigates the impact of Artificial Intelligence on enhancing RIMS functions such as metadata accuracy, researcher profiling, publication tracking, and overall research visibility. Adopting a mixed-method approach, the research combines qualitative insights from structured interviews with library professionals and system administrators, along with quantitative data drawn from institutional repositories, system usage reports, and RIMS documentation. The comparative analysis evaluates key parameters including system architecture, AI-driven functionalities, user engagement, and alignment with global indexing standards. Results reveal that institutions employing AI-enabled RIMS experience significant gains in automated metadata enrichment, efficient workflow management, and real-time data analytics, leading to improved discoverability and institutional research performance. However, the study also identifies persistent challenges such as limited technical infrastructure, integration complexities, and skill gaps among staff. These barriers impede the broader adoption of AI in research management. To address these issues, the study recommends actionable strategies such as fostering AI readiness, implementing targeted training programs, and developing supportive institutional policies. These measures are essential for sustainable and impactful integration of AI within RIMS across diverse academic contexts.

Keywords : AI-Integrated RIMS; Research Information Management; Metadata Accuracy; Institutional Repositories; Research Visibility; Academic Libraries; Comparative Study.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - March - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe