Authors :
Hakim Abdallah
Volume/Issue :
Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/5n8akwhk
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/2s4ku3z7
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT049
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Poverty reduction remains a significant
challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Ghana,
where district assemblies are tasked with implementing
local interventions. This study evaluates the effectiveness
of poverty reduction interventions by the Savelugu-
Nanton Municipal Assembly (SNMA), focusing on
infrastructure and non-infrastructure programmes.
Using a mixed-methods approach, data were gathered
from 353 households and supplemented with insights
from 32 opinion leaders and 4 key informants.
Infrastructure interventions, including roads, dams, and
electricity, were reported to have significantly improved
livelihoods, with 60.1% of respondents citing enhanced
economic opportunities. These findings align with
literature emphasizing infrastructure’s critical role in
poverty alleviation by facilitating access to markets and
services (Adjei & Osei, 2021). Conversely, non-
infrastructure interventions, particularly the Livelihood
Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) programme,
were less effective. While LEAP improved social
inclusion, 80.2% of respondents indicated dissatisfaction
with its impact on economic independence. This supports
critiques of cash transfer programmes that advocate
integrating them with vocational training and credit
access for sustainable outcomes (Owusu, 2020). The
study further underscores the importance of
participatory governance. Limited beneficiary
involvement in planning contributed to a misalignment
between interventions and community needs. As Freire
(1970) posits, active community participation enhances
programme relevance and sustainability. Additionally,
the financial sustainability of these programmes remains
at risk due to SNMA’s reliance on external funding.
Strengthening local resource mobilisation through taxes
and levies is critical for long-term success (Ndlovu-
Gatsheni, 2020). Overall, this study highlights the need
for sustainable infrastructure investment, restructuring
non-infrastructure interventions for long-term economic
empowerment, and fostering participatory governance to
ensure effective poverty reduction.
Keywords :
Poverty Reduction, Infrastructure Interventions, Non-Infrastructure Programmes, LEAP Programme, Participatory Governance, Local Resource Mobilisation.
References :
- Abdallah, H. (2019). Assessing poverty reduction interventions by District Assemblies in Ghana: The perspectives of beneficiaries in the Savelugu-Nanton Municipality (PhD thesis). University for Development Studies, Wa - Ghana.
- Abdulai, A. G., & Hulme, D. (2018). Decentralization, poverty reduction, and the role of local governments in Ghana. Development Policy Review, 36(1), 49-64.
- Adjei, E. M., & Osei, P. D. (2021). The role of infrastructure in poverty reduction: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 13(2), 78-95.
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis: A practical guide to understanding qualitative research. Sage Publications.
- Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Ghana Statistical Service. (2019). Ghana Living Standards Survey (GLSS7) Report. GSS.
- Harding, S. (2018). Objectivity and diversity: Another logic of scientific research. University of Chicago Press.
- Haverkort, B., & Millar, D. (2011). Learning endogenous development: Building on bio-cultural diversity. Practical Action Publishing.
- Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2020). Decolonization, development, and knowledge in Africa: Turning over a new leaf. Routledge.
- Odora-Hoppers, C. A., & Richards, H. (2019). Rethinking thinking: Modernity's "other" and the transformation of the university. UNISA Press.
- Owusu, M. A. (2020). Local resource mobilization and the sustainability of poverty reduction programs in Ghana. African Journal of Economic Development, 42(1), 15-29.
- Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Simms, A. (2019). Cancel the apocalypse: The new path to prosperity. Little Brown.
- World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. World Bank Publications.
Poverty reduction remains a significant
challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Ghana,
where district assemblies are tasked with implementing
local interventions. This study evaluates the effectiveness
of poverty reduction interventions by the Savelugu-
Nanton Municipal Assembly (SNMA), focusing on
infrastructure and non-infrastructure programmes.
Using a mixed-methods approach, data were gathered
from 353 households and supplemented with insights
from 32 opinion leaders and 4 key informants.
Infrastructure interventions, including roads, dams, and
electricity, were reported to have significantly improved
livelihoods, with 60.1% of respondents citing enhanced
economic opportunities. These findings align with
literature emphasizing infrastructure’s critical role in
poverty alleviation by facilitating access to markets and
services (Adjei & Osei, 2021). Conversely, non-
infrastructure interventions, particularly the Livelihood
Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) programme,
were less effective. While LEAP improved social
inclusion, 80.2% of respondents indicated dissatisfaction
with its impact on economic independence. This supports
critiques of cash transfer programmes that advocate
integrating them with vocational training and credit
access for sustainable outcomes (Owusu, 2020). The
study further underscores the importance of
participatory governance. Limited beneficiary
involvement in planning contributed to a misalignment
between interventions and community needs. As Freire
(1970) posits, active community participation enhances
programme relevance and sustainability. Additionally,
the financial sustainability of these programmes remains
at risk due to SNMA’s reliance on external funding.
Strengthening local resource mobilisation through taxes
and levies is critical for long-term success (Ndlovu-
Gatsheni, 2020). Overall, this study highlights the need
for sustainable infrastructure investment, restructuring
non-infrastructure interventions for long-term economic
empowerment, and fostering participatory governance to
ensure effective poverty reduction.
Keywords :
Poverty Reduction, Infrastructure Interventions, Non-Infrastructure Programmes, LEAP Programme, Participatory Governance, Local Resource Mobilisation.