An Assessment of Poverty Reduction Strategies Implemented by District Assemblies in Ghana: The Experience of Beneficiaries in Savelugu-Nanton


Authors : Hakim Abdallah

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/5n8akwhk

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2s4ku3z7

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT049

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : Poverty reduction remains a significant challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Ghana, where district assemblies are tasked with implementing local interventions. This study evaluates the effectiveness of poverty reduction interventions by the Savelugu- Nanton Municipal Assembly (SNMA), focusing on infrastructure and non-infrastructure programmes. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were gathered from 353 households and supplemented with insights from 32 opinion leaders and 4 key informants. Infrastructure interventions, including roads, dams, and electricity, were reported to have significantly improved livelihoods, with 60.1% of respondents citing enhanced economic opportunities. These findings align with literature emphasizing infrastructure’s critical role in poverty alleviation by facilitating access to markets and services (Adjei & Osei, 2021). Conversely, non- infrastructure interventions, particularly the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) programme, were less effective. While LEAP improved social inclusion, 80.2% of respondents indicated dissatisfaction with its impact on economic independence. This supports critiques of cash transfer programmes that advocate integrating them with vocational training and credit access for sustainable outcomes (Owusu, 2020). The study further underscores the importance of participatory governance. Limited beneficiary involvement in planning contributed to a misalignment between interventions and community needs. As Freire (1970) posits, active community participation enhances programme relevance and sustainability. Additionally, the financial sustainability of these programmes remains at risk due to SNMA’s reliance on external funding. Strengthening local resource mobilisation through taxes and levies is critical for long-term success (Ndlovu- Gatsheni, 2020). Overall, this study highlights the need for sustainable infrastructure investment, restructuring non-infrastructure interventions for long-term economic empowerment, and fostering participatory governance to ensure effective poverty reduction.

Keywords : Poverty Reduction, Infrastructure Interventions, Non-Infrastructure Programmes, LEAP Programme, Participatory Governance, Local Resource Mobilisation.

References :

  1. Abdallah, H. (2019). Assessing poverty reduction interventions by District Assemblies in Ghana: The perspectives of beneficiaries in the Savelugu-Nanton Municipality (PhD thesis). University for Development Studies, Wa - Ghana.
  2. Abdulai, A. G., & Hulme, D. (2018). Decentralization, poverty reduction, and the role of local governments in Ghana. Development Policy Review, 36(1), 49-64.
  3. Adjei, E. M., & Osei, P. D. (2021). The role of infrastructure in poverty reduction: Evidence from Ghana. Journal of Infrastructure Development, 13(2), 78-95.
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis: A practical guide to understanding qualitative research. Sage Publications.
  5. Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  6. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley.
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  9. Ghana Statistical Service. (2019). Ghana Living Standards Survey (GLSS7) Report. GSS.
  10. Harding, S. (2018). Objectivity and diversity: Another logic of scientific research. University of Chicago Press.
  11. Haverkort, B., & Millar, D. (2011). Learning endogenous development: Building on bio-cultural diversity. Practical Action Publishing.
  12. Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2020). Decolonization, development, and knowledge in Africa: Turning over a new leaf. Routledge.
  13. Odora-Hoppers, C. A., & Richards, H. (2019). Rethinking thinking: Modernity's "other" and the transformation of the university. UNISA Press.
  14. Owusu, M. A. (2020). Local resource mobilization and the sustainability of poverty reduction programs in Ghana. African Journal of Economic Development, 42(1), 15-29.
  15. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  16. Simms, A. (2019). Cancel the apocalypse: The new path to prosperity. Little Brown.
  17. World Bank. (2020). World development report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. World Bank Publications.

Poverty reduction remains a significant challenge in sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Ghana, where district assemblies are tasked with implementing local interventions. This study evaluates the effectiveness of poverty reduction interventions by the Savelugu- Nanton Municipal Assembly (SNMA), focusing on infrastructure and non-infrastructure programmes. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were gathered from 353 households and supplemented with insights from 32 opinion leaders and 4 key informants. Infrastructure interventions, including roads, dams, and electricity, were reported to have significantly improved livelihoods, with 60.1% of respondents citing enhanced economic opportunities. These findings align with literature emphasizing infrastructure’s critical role in poverty alleviation by facilitating access to markets and services (Adjei & Osei, 2021). Conversely, non- infrastructure interventions, particularly the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) programme, were less effective. While LEAP improved social inclusion, 80.2% of respondents indicated dissatisfaction with its impact on economic independence. This supports critiques of cash transfer programmes that advocate integrating them with vocational training and credit access for sustainable outcomes (Owusu, 2020). The study further underscores the importance of participatory governance. Limited beneficiary involvement in planning contributed to a misalignment between interventions and community needs. As Freire (1970) posits, active community participation enhances programme relevance and sustainability. Additionally, the financial sustainability of these programmes remains at risk due to SNMA’s reliance on external funding. Strengthening local resource mobilisation through taxes and levies is critical for long-term success (Ndlovu- Gatsheni, 2020). Overall, this study highlights the need for sustainable infrastructure investment, restructuring non-infrastructure interventions for long-term economic empowerment, and fostering participatory governance to ensure effective poverty reduction.

Keywords : Poverty Reduction, Infrastructure Interventions, Non-Infrastructure Programmes, LEAP Programme, Participatory Governance, Local Resource Mobilisation.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe