An Effective Alternative to Current Mathematics


Authors : Ismail Abbas

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 9 - September


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/vwm6tfnr

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/bdcw4z94

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24SEP1243

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : If you don't understand mathematics, ask yourself if I'm right, because others don't understand mathematics either. By effective alternative to current mathematics, we mean working in a more complete mathematical space than the classical 3D+t variety which is inadequate for generating well-defined definitions and hypotheses as well as its limited ability to solve time-dependent partial differential equations. The current classical discrete 3D+t space PDE, in which time is an external controller and not integrated into the 3D geometric space, cannot be integrated digitally. This space is logically incomplete and misleading in the production of definitions and hypotheses as well as in the resolution itself of time- dependent PDEs. It is no wonder that these definitions/assumptions are confusing and result in weak or intractable mathematics, leading to all kinds of misunderstandings, from horrible notations to undisciplined length of theorems containing a considerable amount of black magic and ending with a gray nature of the mathematical result obtained. In this article, we present some of the most inaccurate assumptions and definitions in current classical mathematics that arise from using the 3D+t manifold space to specify initial conditions, boundary conditions, and the source/sink term. Fortunately, these inaccurate assumptions that start with inadequate space for boundary conditions, initial conditions, and source/sink term can be spotted and analyzed via 4D unitary numerical statistical theory called Cairo techniques in the format of transition chains of matrix B to complete what is missing. In other words, we present how to spot some of the worst mathematical conclusions of classical 3D geometry plus t as an external control numerical space, and then show how to correct them via the 4D unit space which is the subject of this article.

References :

  1. I.M. Abbas, A numerical statistical solution to the partial differential equations of Laplace and Poisson, I.M. Abbas, IJISRT journal, Volume 5, Number 11, November – 2020.
  2. I. Abbas, IJISRT, Time Dependent Numerical Statistical Solution of the Partial Differential Heat Diffusion Equation, Volume6, Issue , January – 2021.
  3. Abbas, How nature works in four-dimensional space: the complex and untold story, ResearchGate, IJISRT journal, May 2023.
  4. I. Abbas, Is it time to reformulate the partial differential equations of Poisson and Laplace? , ResearchGate, IJISRT review, June 2023.
  5. I.M. Abbas, IJISRT, Time Dependent Numerical Statistical Solution of the Partial Differential Heat Diffusion Equation, Volume6,Issue ,January – 2021
  6. John H. Mathews, Numerical methods for Mathematics, Science and Engineering,1994, pp. 346- 399.
  7. Mona Rahmani, UBC, Numerical methods for solving the heat equation, the wave equation and the Laplace equation (finite difference methods, January 2019
  8. I. Abbas, Partial differential equations versus modern statistical mechanics-The doomy future, ResearchGate, IJISRT review,  May 2024.
  9. I. Abbas, Effective unconventional approach to statistical differentiation and statistical integration, ResearchGate, IJISRT journal, November 2022.
  10. I. Abbas, A rigorous experimental technique for measuring the thermal diffusivity of metals, ResearchGate, IJISRT review, August 2022.
  11. I. Abbas, Unitary space, Laplacian theorem and speed of light c, , ResearchGate, IJISRT journal, August 2024.
  12. I. Abbas, Is it time to demolish current mathematics ?,IJISRT journal, Sept, 2024.
  13. I. Abbas, Quantum Buzzle, Vacuum Dynamics and the Big Bang June 2024, International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. DOI: 10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1700 Lab: Ismail Abbas's Lab
  14. I. Abbas, Theory and design of audio rooms -Physical formulation, ResearchGate, IJISRT review, August 2024.
  15. B12- -I. Abbas, How to transform B-Matrix chains into Markov chains and vice versa, ResearchGate, IJISRT review, December 2020
  16. I.M. Abbas et al, A critical analysis of the propagation mechanisms of ionizing waves in the event of a breakdown, I Abbas, P Bayle, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics13 (6),8-
  17. I.M. Abbas et al, IEEE.1996, Pseudo spark -discharge, PlasmaScienceTransactions24(3):1106 - 1119, DOI:10.1109/27.

If you don't understand mathematics, ask yourself if I'm right, because others don't understand mathematics either. By effective alternative to current mathematics, we mean working in a more complete mathematical space than the classical 3D+t variety which is inadequate for generating well-defined definitions and hypotheses as well as its limited ability to solve time-dependent partial differential equations. The current classical discrete 3D+t space PDE, in which time is an external controller and not integrated into the 3D geometric space, cannot be integrated digitally. This space is logically incomplete and misleading in the production of definitions and hypotheses as well as in the resolution itself of time- dependent PDEs. It is no wonder that these definitions/assumptions are confusing and result in weak or intractable mathematics, leading to all kinds of misunderstandings, from horrible notations to undisciplined length of theorems containing a considerable amount of black magic and ending with a gray nature of the mathematical result obtained. In this article, we present some of the most inaccurate assumptions and definitions in current classical mathematics that arise from using the 3D+t manifold space to specify initial conditions, boundary conditions, and the source/sink term. Fortunately, these inaccurate assumptions that start with inadequate space for boundary conditions, initial conditions, and source/sink term can be spotted and analyzed via 4D unitary numerical statistical theory called Cairo techniques in the format of transition chains of matrix B to complete what is missing. In other words, we present how to spot some of the worst mathematical conclusions of classical 3D geometry plus t as an external control numerical space, and then show how to correct them via the 4D unit space which is the subject of this article.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe