Authors : Suneetha Raghu; Dr. Krishnappa J; Dr. Zeanath C J; Renukashree

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/nvzskn9

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/tk53y7zu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul445

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : Introduction: A complicated topic is nutritional care for the critically ill. The comprehension of the metabolic response to critical disease and several facets of nutritional treatment, such as tracking the metabolic response and calculating calorie, protein, and micronutrient requirements, have undergone significant modifications due to a number of recent research. Highlighting areas of agreement and disagreement, summarising current research, and establishing research priorities are the objectives of this study. Our understanding of the metabolic response to stress and the best ways to manage nutrition in critically ill patients have been called into question due to the outcomes of recent large-scale clinical trials. This study provides an update in this area, pointing out and addressing areas where consensus has been reached, as well as those where controversy still exists and suggesting topics for further investigation. Dieticians and nutritionists provide dietary services after the initial nutritional screening, which include consultation with other medical professionals, to address the nutritional needs of individuals. The study's conclusions is useful in determining how important diet is for patients' recuperation at teaching hospitals. In a tertiary care hospital, this study carried out a thorough assessment of patients' access to nutritional screening and satisfaction with dietary services. There were two main goals: the first was to look into how clinicians go about doing initial nutritional screenings, and the second was to find out how satisfied patients were with the hospital's dietary services. In order to accomplish these goals, a comprehensive analysis of pertinent research was carried out, including studies on nutritional screening instruments, techniques for gauging patient satisfaction with hospital food services, and variables impacting patient happiness. The analysis and interpretation of the study were supported by a strong theoretical foundation that this literature review offered. Aims & Objectives of the study is to find out the process of initial Nutritional screening by the clinicians for better dieticians' recommendations and to study the satisfaction level among the patients availing the dietary service in hospital. Methodology: This study will be undertaken with the principal objective to measure the adequacy of initial nutritional screening and food satisfactions to patients in the hospital though a structured checklist over 6 months’ period of time. To evaluate patient satisfaction and the promptness of nutritional screening, data from several hospital departments were gathered and examined. Significant differences in the initial nutritional screening procedure between departments were found by the analysis. Some departments screened new admissions within 24 to 48 hours, but others took longer and took longer to screen—the average department taking more than 72 hours. This variation made it clear that a more uniform method of nutritional screening was required in order to guarantee prompt evaluations for every patient. Patient satisfaction levels were found to differ accordingly, with greater levels reported in departments that followed tailored dietary regimens and swiftly performed nutritional tests. Quality of food, promptness of service, staff attention to patient demands, and applicability of dietary recommendations were factors that affected patient satisfaction. These results underlined the significance of attending to the comprehensive patient experience within dietary services in addition to the technical aspects of nutritional evaluation. The study's conclusions led to the proposal of various proposals for enhancement. These suggestions included establishing uniform screening procedures for all departments, improving clinical and dietary staff training programs, stepping up patient information campaigns, and setting up feedback systems for ongoing development. Overall, the results of this study have important implications for improving patient happiness and the standard of nutritional care in hospital settings. Through the implementation of suggested enhancements and the resolution of recognized deficiencies, the hospital can endeavor to enhance patient satisfaction and attain superior health results for patients utilizing nutritional services.

Keywords : Nutritional Screening, Patient Satisfaction, Tertiary Care Hospital.

References :

1. Arrowsmith H. (1999) A critical evaluation of the use of nutrition screening tools by nurses. British Journal of Clinical Nursing 8(22), 1483–1490.
2. Arora M, Thakur S, Gupta R. Assessment of patients’ satisfaction through dietary services in government and private hospitals in India. Int J Health Sci (Qassim) 2022;18;6536–6546. DOI: 10.53730/ ijhs.v6nS3.7466
3. Baker J.P., Detsky A.S., Wesson D., Woman S.L., Stewart S., Whitewell J., Langer B. & Jeejeebhoy K.N. (1982a) Nutritional assessment: a comparison of clinical judgement and objective measurement. New England Journal of Medicine 306(16), 969–972.
4. Baker J.P., Detsky A.S., Whitwell J., Langer B. & Jeejeebhoy K.N. (1982b) A comparison of the predictive value of nutritional assessment techniques. Human Nutrition Clinical Nutrition 36(3), 233–241.
5. BAPEN (2000) Explanatory Notes for the Screening Tool for Adults at Risk of Malnutrition. British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, Maidenhead.
6. Baer M.T. & Harris A.B. (1997) Pediatric nutrition assessment: identifying children at risk. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 97(Suppl. 2), S107–S115.
7. Baroni M. & Sondel S. (1995) A collaborative model for identifying feeding and nutrition needs in early intervention. Infants and Young Children 8(2), 15–25.
8. Brown C.S.B. & Stegman M.R. (1988) Nutritional assessment of surgical patients. Quality Review Bulletin 14(10), 302–306.
9. Burden S.T., Bodey S., Bradburn Y.J., Murdoch A.L., Thompson A.L., Sim J.M. & Sowerbutts A.M. (2001) Validation of a nutritional screening tool: testing the reliability and validity. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 14, 269–275.
10. Campbell M.K. & Kelsey K.S. (1994) The PEACH survey: a nutrition screening tool for use in early intervention programs. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 94(10), 1156–1158.
11. Lai H, Gemming L. Approaches to patient satisfaction measurement of the healthcare food services: a systematic review. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2021;42:61–72.
12. Macqueen C.E. & Frost G. (1998) Visual analogue scales: a screening tool for assessing nutritional need in head and neck radiotherapy patients. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics 11(2), 115– 124.
13. Muraal S, Davar V. Assessment of acceptability and satisfaction of patients for government hospital diets. IOSR J Nurs Heal Sci 2014;3(2):38–40.
14. Reilly H.M., Martineau J.K., Moran A. & Kennedy H. (1995) Nutritional screening – evaluation and implementation of a simple nutrition risk score. Clinical Nutrition 14(5), 269–273.
15. Sizer T.Ed. (1996) Standards and Guidelines for Nutritional Support of Patients in Hospital. British Association for Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition, Maidenhead.
16. Sahin B, Demir C, Celik Y, et al. Factors affecting satisfaction level with the food services in a military hospital. J Med Syst 2006;30(5):381–387. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-006-9022-3
17. Sahin B, Demir C, Celik Y, et al. Factors affecting satisfaction level with the food services in a military hospital. J Med Syst 2006;30(5):381–387. DOI: 10.1007/s10916-006-9022-3
18. Thorsdottir I., Eriksen B. & Eysteinsdottir S. (1999) Nutritional status at submission for dietetic services and screening for malnutrition at admission to hospital. Clinical Nutrition 18(1), 15–21.

19. White J.V., Dwyer J.T., Posner, B.M., Ham R.J., Lipschitz D.A. & Wellman N.S. (1992) Nutrition Screening Initiative: Development and implementation of the public awareness checklist and screening tools. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 92, 163–167.
20. Watters CA, Sorensen J, Fiala A, et al. Exploring patient satisfaction with foodservice through focus groups and meal rounds. J Am Diet Assoc 2003;103(10):1347–1349. DOI: 10.1016/s0002- 8223(03)01077-0