Authors : Dr. Sasikala P.

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/evn3r22m

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3ynmrv39

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jul867

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Student performance prediction has become an important research area in educational data mining because it enables educational institutions to identify academically at-risk students and implement timely intervention strategies. Although machine learning techniques have significantly improved prediction accuracy, many existing models function as black-box systems that provide limited explanation of the factors influencing academic performance. The absence of interpretability restricts educators from understanding the reasoning behind prediction outcomes and reduces confidence in adopting artificial intelligence-based decision support systems. This study proposes an explainable ensemble learning approach for student performance prediction by integrating Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM classifiers with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). The proposed framework includes data preprocessing, feature engineering, ensemble learning, and feature interpretation to improve both predictive performance and model transparency. A publicly available student performance dataset containing 14,003 student records with 16 academic, behavioural, and demographic attributes is used for experimental evaluation. The dataset is divided into training and testing subsets using an 80:20 ratio. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-Score, and ROC-AUC and compared with conventional machine learning models. SHAP analysis is employed to identify the contribution of individual features influencing student performance, enabling transparent and interpretable predictions. The proposed approach assists educators in identifying the key factors affecting academic achievement and supports timely intervention for improving student success. The results demonstrate that combining ensemble learning with explainable artificial intelligence provides an effective and reliable framework for educational decision-making.

Keywords : Student Performance Prediction, Educational Data Mining, Ensemble Learning, Explainable Artificial Intelligence, SHAP, Learning Analytics.

References :

1. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3), e1355. Google Scholar Indexed
2. Alyahyan, E., & Düştegör, D. (2020). Predicting academic success in higher education: Literature review and best practices. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 3. Google Scholar Indexed
3. Hussain, S., Dahan, N. A., Ba-Alwi, F. M., & Ribata, N. (2018). Educational data mining and analysis of students' academic performance using WEKA. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 9(2), 447–459. Google Scholar Indexed
4. Shahiri, A. M., Husain, W., & Rashid, N. A. (2015). A review on predicting students' performance using data mining techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 414–422. Google Scholar Indexed
5. Breiman, L. (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32. Google Scholar Indexed
6. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794. Google Scholar Indexed
7. Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., Ye, Q., & Liu, T. Y. (2017). LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 3146–3154. Google Scholar Indexed
8. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774. Google Scholar Indexed
9. Lundberg, S. M., Erion, G., Chen, H., et al. (2020). From local explanations to global understanding with explainable AI for trees. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(1), 56–67. Google Scholar Indexed
10. Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable Machine Learning (2nd ed.). Lulu.com. Google Scholar Indexed
11. Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144. Google Scholar Indexed
12. Aggarwal, C. C. (2018). Neural Networks and Deep Learning. Springer. Google Scholar Indexed
13. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830. Google Scholar Indexed
14. Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., et al. (2019). PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 8024–8035. Google Scholar Indexed
15. Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002). SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 6, 321–357. Google Scholar Indexed