Authors : Meriam G. Ely

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/avhszaex

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3kr3y5yj

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1282

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The purpose of the study was to determine what personal information need further explanation on the utilization of DepEd computerization program in terms of; (1) purpose of computer usage, (2) indicated computer skills, (3) type of software for teaching and learning, (4) educational software by subject, (5) types of peripherals, (6) teaching and learning activities by subject and (7) internet usage of teachers and students. Further, to find out the significant difference between the utilization of DepEd computerization program when they are grouped according to their personal information variables. A total of 30 EPP/TLE teachers of Binugao District are the respondents were identified through purposive sampling technique. The study utilized explanatory sequential mixed method design. Two methods in collecting the data were utilized, for the quantitative phase the researcher used survey questionnaire in determining the personal information and utilization of DCP. Furthermore, in the qualitative phase the researcher used in-depth interview in gathering the data to identify what school program should be enhanced in utilizing DCP efficiently. On the quantitative analysis, there is no significant difference between the utilization of DepEd computerization program when they are grouped according to their personal information variables. In addition, the quantitative findings were follow-up by the qualitative findings. Thus, it was found that the school program to enhance the utilization of DCP efficiently of teachers revealed four major themes namely: (1) resiliency, (2) results-focus, (3) innovation and (4) receptiveness.

Keywords : Deped Computerization Program (DCP), Explanatory Sequential.

References :

1. Alharbi, E. (2014). A Study on the use of ICT in teaching in secondary schools.In Kuwait. Cardiff Schools of Education.Cardiff Metropolitan University. Retrieved on September 23, 2017 from  http://www.cse.edu/ ncte/news/a-study-on-the-use-of-ict-in-teaching-secondary-schools-kuwait.
2. Cox, M., Preston, C., Cox, K. (2002). What factors support and prevent teachers from using ICT in their classroom. University of Sussex, Brigton.
3. Gravifekr, S., Rosdy, W.A.W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in Schools.International Journal Researchin Education and Science (IJRES).1(2).175-191.
4. Jung, S-H. (2006). The use of information and communication technology in learning English as an international language. Department of Curriculum and Instruction. Retrieved from https://drum.lib.umd.edu/bitstream/handle/1903/3885/umi-umd-3733.pdf?sequence=1
5. Mazoya, A., Ismail, A., & Manyilizu, M. (2015). Age of teachers vs ICT use in Tanzanian secondary schools: A case of Dodoma Municipality. International Journal of Computer Applications, 132(14), 22-26.  
6. Pardaboyevich, R. F., Abdunazirovich, U. S., & Saydullayevich, S. Q. (2020). Teaching computer science at school-current challenges and prospects. JournalNX, 6(11), 217-221.
7. Russell, Michael & O'Dwyer, Laura & Bebell, Damian & Tao, Wei. (2018). How Teachers' Uses of Technology Vary by Tenure and Longevity. Journal of Educational Computing Research - J EDUC COMPUT RES. 37. 393-417. 10.2190/EC.37.4.d.
8. Tinio, V.L. (2002). Survey of information & communication technology utilization in Philippine public high schools.Foundation for Information Technology Education and Development Commissioned by the Center of International Cooperation for Computerization, Government of Japan.p. 151.
9. Zakaria NF, Ali NF, Ismail (2013). Issues and challenges in Teaching and ICT.Information and Communication Technology Science Group. http://learningforward.org/docs/jsd-feb-2011/326.pdf?sfvrsn=2