Authors :
Nunung Setiyana; Dewi Nusraningrum
Volume/Issue :
Volume 7 - 2022, Issue 7 - July
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3IIfn9N
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/3dFYkvb
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7008323
Abstract :
PT PELNI (Persero) is a ship transportation
company that provides the best service for customers. The
Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and Analytical Hierarchy
Process (AHP) methodologies were used to identify the most
important factor in the discrepancy in the quality of safety
equipment on board PT PELNI (Persero) ships. In this
study, four main criteria of non-conformance of nautical
safety tools were identified. They are maintenance time,
quality, cost, and technique. According to the findings of
this study, the most prioritized criterion was the
maintenance schedule. Using each criterion and its subcriteria, the weight of each alternative is then calculated.
The lifeboat with the highest value weight is the most
important alternative.
Keywords :
Nautical Safety Tools, Ship Optimization, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
PT PELNI (Persero) is a ship transportation
company that provides the best service for customers. The
Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and Analytical Hierarchy
Process (AHP) methodologies were used to identify the most
important factor in the discrepancy in the quality of safety
equipment on board PT PELNI (Persero) ships. In this
study, four main criteria of non-conformance of nautical
safety tools were identified. They are maintenance time,
quality, cost, and technique. According to the findings of
this study, the most prioritized criterion was the
maintenance schedule. Using each criterion and its subcriteria, the weight of each alternative is then calculated.
The lifeboat with the highest value weight is the most
important alternative.
Keywords :
Nautical Safety Tools, Ship Optimization, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
