Authors :
Md. Ehtasamul Haque; Shilpa Sharma
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/mwa4rc9t
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun1763
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.
Abstract :
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of mutual funds across equity, hybrid, and debt categories in the
Indian financial market, focusing on their performance evaluation, risk assessment, and investment suitability. Utilizing a
range of quantitative metrics such as Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, Alpha, Beta, Standard Deviation, R-squared, CAGR,
Expense Ratio, and Treynor Ratio, the research evaluates 18 different mutual fund categories over a three-year period
(2022– 2025). The findings highlight significant variation in risk-return profiles across fund types, offering tailored insights
for investors based on their risk preferences—aggressive, balanced, or conservative. The study reveals that while certain
actively managed funds outperform benchmarks on a risk- adjusted basis, many fail to justify higher costs. The analysis also
emphasizes the importance of cost- efficiency, long-term consistency, and investor awareness in fund.
References :
- S.K. Barua, V. Raghunathan, and J.R. Varma, “Efficiency and performance of Indian mutual funds,” Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad Working Paper, 1991.
- Prasanna Chandra, “Performance appraisal of mutual funds,” Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management, 2nd ed., Tata McGraw Hill, 2001.
- A. Gupta, “Mutual fund performance in India: A study with reference to Sharpe, Treynor and Jensen's measures,” Finance India, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1235-1246, 2001.
- N.P. Tripathy, “A study of performance of Indian mutual funds with special reference to equity diversified mutual funds,” The ICFAI Journal of Applied Finance, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 26-45, 2007.
- S. Sehgal and M. Jhanwar, “Market timing and selectivity performance of Indian mutual funds: An empirical investigation,” Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 25-37, 2008.
- R. Singh and R.A. Yadav, “Persistence in performance of Indian mutual funds: Evidence from equity schemes,” Asian Journal of Management Research, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 87–101, 2015.
- R. Sharma and D. Mehta, “Systematic risk exposure and performance of Indian mutual funds: An application of CAPM and multi-factor models,” Indian Journal of Finance, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 28–43, 2018.
- V. Bansal and S. Gupta, “Mutual fund performance and investor perceptions: Evidence from India,” International Journal of Financial Services, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 14– 29, 2020.
This study presents a comprehensive analysis of mutual funds across equity, hybrid, and debt categories in the
Indian financial market, focusing on their performance evaluation, risk assessment, and investment suitability. Utilizing a
range of quantitative metrics such as Sharpe Ratio, Sortino Ratio, Alpha, Beta, Standard Deviation, R-squared, CAGR,
Expense Ratio, and Treynor Ratio, the research evaluates 18 different mutual fund categories over a three-year period
(2022– 2025). The findings highlight significant variation in risk-return profiles across fund types, offering tailored insights
for investors based on their risk preferences—aggressive, balanced, or conservative. The study reveals that while certain
actively managed funds outperform benchmarks on a risk- adjusted basis, many fail to justify higher costs. The analysis also
emphasizes the importance of cost- efficiency, long-term consistency, and investor awareness in fund.