Authors : Mulyadi; Fibi Eko Putra; Putri Anggun Sari

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/44yb7ct9

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/zztfds63

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUN1711

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The modern manufacturing industry is faced with increasing pressure to achieve high levels of quality while remaining efficient in its production processes. One of the challenges faced by PT. Plating services in electroplating production have a high reject rate, which can cause increased costs and have a negative impact on the company's reputation. PT. Jasa Plating in the production process still has a high number of rejects, the rejects are dominated by opaque, peel-off and spots. PT. Plating services for each production contribute a high average of 2% defects per day, DPMO 20,000 and Sigma value 3.55. Quite a few rejections resulted in a decrease in turnover and increased production costs. The costs incurred due to these rejects are an average of Rp. 1,268,593 per day and an average of Rp. 35,698,907 per month as a result of data collection from January – September 2023. In this business process, this is very detrimental for the company. The aim of this research is to suppress blurry rejects, peel-offs and spots in the electro plating process at PT. Plating Services. The steps taken in conducting research include: identification stage, data collection and processing, analysis and recommendations for improvement, and conclusions. The method used in this research is the Six Sigma DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analysis, Improvement, Control) method. Through analysis, you can find several factors that cause high reject rates, including operational errors, discrepancies in the production process, or raw material quality problems. After implementing the improvement plan, then evaluate the results. This can include re- measuring the DPMO, analysis of the resulting products to see a decrease in reject rates, and comparisons between before and after implementing improvements. From the comparison results after the repairs were carried out, the data before the repairs were carried out, the NG amount was 1.99%, the DPMO was 6,646 and the Sigma value was 3.98. After improvements to NG 0.84%, DPMO 2,791 sigma value 4.28. Factors causing high levels of blurring, peel-off and spots, namely insufficient or excessive cleaning of the metal surface before the electroplating process, can cause problems such as peel-off. Contamination of the electroplating solution by foreign materials can cause blurring and flecks in the final layer. Machinery or equipment that is not properly calibrated, or experiences wear and tear, can produce products that do not meet standards. Variations in temperature, time, or electric current in the electroplating process can produce inconsistent coatings. Carefully monitor and control process-parameters to ensure stability.

Keywords : Electro Plating, Reject, Six Sigma DMAIC, DPMO.

References :

1. B. Permadi and E. Budiyanto, “Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro 2,3 Jl. Ki Hajar Dewantara 15 A Kota Metro”.
2. E. Suprianto, “PENGENDALIAN KUALITAS PRODUKSI MENGGUNAKAN ALAT BANTU STATISTIK (SEVEN TOOLS) DALAM UPAYA MENEKAN TINGKAT KERUSAKAN PRODUK,” 2016.
3. H. M. Mulyana, N. Surbakti, and J. Ki Hajar Dewantara, “Menurunkan Problem Reject Pinhole di Proses dengan Konsep DMAIC di PT. XYZ, Purwakarta,” 2018.
4. S. Kusuma Dewi and D. Maslahatul Ummah, “PERBAIKAN KUALITAS PADA PRODUK GENTENG DENGAN METODE SIX SIGMA,” 2019.
5. “Essentials of Lean Six Sigma.”
6. T. Wicakseno, D. Silvia Program Studi Teknologi Industri Cetak Kemasan, P. G. Negeri Jakarta Jl A Siwabessy, and K. Baru, “Metode Six Sigma Dalam Perbaikan Cacat Botol pada Produk Personal Care Six Sigma Method in Repairing Bottle Defects in Personal Care Products.”
7. M. Sya’roni and H. Suliantoro, “ANALISIS PENGURANGAN DEFECT PRODUKSI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE SIX SIGMA PADA UNIT PAINTING SMARTPHONE MERK POLYTRON (Studi Kasus pada PT. Hartono Istana Teknologi Kudus).”
8. S. Kusuma Dewi, “MINIMASI DEFECT PRODUK DENGAN KONSEP SIX SIGMA.”
9. P. Fithri, “SIX SIGMA SEBAGAI ALAT PENGENDALIAN MUTU PADA HASIL PRODUKSI KAIN MENTAH PT UNITEX, TBK,” 2019.
10. P. Adi Wicaksono, D. Puspita Sari, N. Utami Handayani, H. Prastawa, and A. Dewa Ramadhan, “PENINGKATAN PENGENDALIAN KUALITAS MELALUI METODE LEAN SIX SIGMA,” 2017.
11. Anisa Rosyidasari and I. Iftadi, “Implementasi Six Sigma dalam Pengendalian Kualitas Produk Refined Bleached Deodorized Palm Oil,” Jurnal INTECH Teknik Industri Universitas Serang Raya, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 113–122, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.30656/intech.v6i2.2420.
12. A. Prasetyo, dan Ratna Murtisari Dewi, I. Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, and J. Teknik Industri, “PENGENDALIAN KUALITAS PADA SPANDEK DENGAN PENERAPAN SIX SIGMA DAN KAIZEN UNTUK MEMINIMASI PRODUK CACAT (Studi Kasus: PT. ABC).”