Authors : Safiatur Rokhmah; Dudi Permana; Farida Elmi; Sugiyono

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 7 - July

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4auv6mzw

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/jjbrvfu7

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24JUL1720

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The success of digital transformation at UIN SMH Banten greatly depends on the support from top management. Top management support is a key factor that determines the success of digital transformation implementation. This support includes the provision of adequate resources, making strategic decisions, and fostering an organizational culture that supports innovation and change. One concrete step taken by top management is the implementation of office automation for staff and lecturers. This automation includes the use of task management software, digital filing systems, and online collaboration tools designed to enhance productivity and work efficiency. The method used is quantitative research with a correlational approach. The population of this study consists of 495 lecturers, staff, and students at UIN SMH Banten, with a sample of 83 respondents. The data was analyzed using Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) with the SmartPLS 4.1.0.3 software. Top Management Commitment, Stakeholder Engagement, and Vision & Mission were found to affect Digital Transformation, and all of them influence Strategic Decision-Making. Strategic Decision-Making was also found to affect Digital Transformation and is able to mediate the effects of Top Management Commitment, Stakeholder Engagement, and Vision & Mission. To enhance Digital Transformation, Top Management Commitment, Stakeholder Engagement, Vision & Mission, and Strategic Decision- Making.

Keywords : Digital Transformation; Top Management Commitment; Stakeholder Engagement; Vision & Mission; Strategic Decision-Making.

References :

1. M. J. Al Shobaki, S. S. A. Naser, Y. M. A. Amuna, and S. A. El Talla, “Impact of electronic human resources management on the development of electronic educational services in the universities,” Int. J. Eng. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2017.
2. F. Imran, K. Shahzad, A. Butt, and J. Kantola, “Digital transformation of industrial organizations: Toward an integrated framework,” J. Chang. Manag., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 451–479, 2021.
3. F. J. L. Handley, “Developing Digital Skills and Literacies in UK Higher Education: Recent developments and a case study of the Digital Literacies Framework at the University of Brighton, UK,” 2018.
4. A. A. Taiwo and F. A. Lawal, “Vision and mission in organization: Myth or heuristic device?,” Int. J. Bus. Manag., vol. 4, no. 3, 2016.
5. C. Eden and F. Ackermann, Making strategy: The journey of strategic management. Sage, 2013.
6. R. Watson, H. N. Wilson, P. Smart, and E. K. Macdonald, “Harnessing difference: a capability‐based framework for stakeholder engagement in environmental innovation,” J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 254–279, 2018.
7. S. J. Hogan and L. V Coote, “Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 67, no. 8, pp. 1609–1621, 2014.
8. A. Ko, P. Fehér, T. Kovacs, A. Mitev, and Z. Szabó, “Influencing factors of digital transformation: management or IT is the driving force?,” Int. J. Innov. Sci., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–20, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1108/IJIS-01-2021-0007.
9. X. Zhang, Y. Y. Xu, and L. Ma, “Information technology investment and digital transformation: the roles of digital transformation strategy and top management,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 528–549, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2022-0254.
10. E. Artemenko, “The roles of top management in digital transformation,” in IOP Conference series: materials science and engineering, 2020, vol. 940, no. 1, p. 12014.
11. S. Nambisan, M. Wright, and M. Feldman, “The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes,” Res. Policy, vol. 48, no. 8, p. 103773, 2019.
12. I. O. Pappas, P. Mikalef, M. N. Giannakos, J. Krogstie, and G. Lekakos, “Big data and business analytics ecosystems: paving the way towards digital transformation and sustainable societies,” Information systems and e-business management, vol. 16, no. 3. Springer, pp. 479–491, 2018.
13. B. Hinings, T. Gegenhuber, and R. Greenwood, “Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective,” Inf. Organ., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 52–61, 2018.
14. A. Behrendt, E. De Boer, T. Kasah, B. Koerber, N. Mohr, and G. Richter, “Leveraging Industrial IoT and advanced technologies for digital transformation,” McKinsey Co., pp. 1–75, 2021.
15. K. S. R. Warner and M. Wäger, “Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal,” Long Range Plann., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 326–349, 2019.
16. A. Nabung, L. Ni, and A. L. Edu, “An Analysis of the Digital Transformation-Based Learning Implementation System in the Era of Disruption,” J. Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 4265–4271, 2022.
17. J. Oakland, “Leadership and policy deployment: the backbone of TQM,” Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 517–534, 2011.
18. M. Gagné, “From strategy to action: Transforming organizational goals into organizational behavior,” Int. J. Manag. Rev., vol. 20, pp. S83–S104, 2018.
19. I. Yucel, A. McMillan, and O. C. Richard, “Does CEO transformational leadership influence top executive normative commitment?,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1170–1177, 2014.
20. D. K. Gurley, G. B. Peters, L. Collins, and M. Fifolt, “Mission, vision, values, and goals: An exploration of key organizational statements and daily practice in schools,” J. Educ. Chang., vol. 16, pp. 217–242, 2015.
21. A. Wiek and D. Iwaniec, “Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science,” Sustain. Sci., vol. 9, pp. 497–512, 2014.
22. A. B. Fitzsimmons, Y. S. Qin, and E. R. Heffron, “Purpose vs mission vs vision: persuasive appeals and components in corporate statements,” J. Commun. Manag., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 207–219, 2022.
23. J. Kujala, S. Sachs, H. Leinonen, A. Heikkinen, and D. Laude, “Stakeholder engagement: Past, present, and future,” Bus. Soc., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1136–1196, 2022.
24. A. MacDonald, A. Clarke, and L. Huang, “Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainability: Designing decision-making processes for partnership capacity,” in Business and the ethical implications of technology, Springer, 2022, pp. 103–120.
25. T. W. Concannon et al., “A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research,” J. Gen. Intern. Med., vol. 29, pp. 1692–1701, 2014.
26. K. Kozioł-Nadolna and K. Beyer, “Determinants of the decision-making process in organizations,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 192, pp. 2375–2384, 2021.
27. R. Vecchiato, “Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making: An integrated study,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 436–447, 2012.
28. Y. Y. Haimes, Risk modeling, assessment, and management. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
29. G. A. Steiner, Strategic planning. Simon and Schuster, 2010.
30. D. Sugiyono, “Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D,” 2013.
31. N. Schilling, “Surveys and interviews,” Res. methods Linguist., vol. 96, 2013.
32. J. Lofland, D. Snow, L. Anderson, and L. H. Lofland, Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Waveland Press, 2022.
33. I. Brace, Questionnaire design: How to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. Kogan Page Publishers, 2018.
34. C. A. Mertler, R. A. Vannatta, and K. N. LaVenia, Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. Routledge, 2021.
35. H. Latan, R. Noonan, and L. Matthews, “Partial least squares path modeling,” Partial least squares path Model. basic concepts, Methodol. issues Appl., 2017.
36. V. R. Laganà, F. Lombardi, D. Di Gregorio, and A. Nicolosi, “Consumption Preferences for Truffles and Truffle-Based Products: An Application of the PLS-SEM Model,” Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 12, p. 5002, 2024.
37. R. B. D’Agostino, Goodness-of-fit-techniques. Routledge, 2017.
38. W. E. Martin and K. D. Bridgmon, Quantitative and statistical research methods: From hypothesis to results. John Wiley & Sons, 2012.
39. J. F. Hair Jr, L. M. Matthews, R. L. Matthews, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use,” Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 107–123, 2017.
40. B. Muzaffar, “The development and validation of a scale to measure training culture: the TC Scale,” J. Cult. Soc. Dev., vol. 23, 2016.
41. P. Meyer, Understanding measurement: reliability. Oxford University Press, 2010.
42. M. A. Bujang, E. D. Omar, and N. A. Baharum, “A review on sample size determination for Cronbach’s alpha test: a simple guide for researchers,” Malaysian J. Med. Sci. MJMS, vol. 25, no. 6, p. 85, 2018.
43. J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, and C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM,” Eur. Bus. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24, 2019.
44. N. Shrestha, “Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis,” Am. J. Appl. Math. Stat., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 4–11, 2021.
45. N. Baltes and M.-D. Rodean, “The influence of the endogenous and exogenous factors on credit institutions’ return on equity,” Stud. Univ. „Vasile Goldis” Arad–Economics Ser., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 16–25, 2015.
46. H. M. Park, “Hypothesis testing and statistical power of a test,” 2015.
47. A. Lutfi et al., “Factors influencing the adoption of big data analytics in the digital transformation era: Case study of Jordanian SMEs,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 3, p. 1802, 2022.
48. S. Javed, “Impact of top management commitment on quality management,” Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ., vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1–5, 2015.
49. D. Robu and J. B. Lazar, “Shaping Successful Stakeholder Engagement by Design: Digital Transformation in Healthcare,” in European Conference on Knowledge Management, 2020, pp. 677–XXI.
50. S. Papavasiliou and A. Gorod, “Stakeholder Management in Digital Transformation: A System of Systems Approach,” in 2022 17th Annual System of Systems Engineering Conference (SOSE), 2022, pp. 500–505, doi: 10.1109/SOSE55472.2022.9812667.
51. P. Altıok, “Applicable vision, mission and the effects of strategic management on crisis resolve,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 24, pp. 61–71, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.057.
52. S. Shirokova, L. Solovyov, E. Gnatenko, and N. Lohyeeta, “Implementation of the digital transformation concept during decision-making process in a construction company: Digital transformation as a driver of strategic decision-making in a commercial organization,” 2021, doi: 10.1145/3446434.3446464.