Authors :
Yudha Daniel Pangestu; Nia Kusuma Wardhani
Volume/Issue :
Volume 8 - 2023, Issue 3 - March
Google Scholar :
https://bit.ly/3TmGbDi
Scribd :
https://bit.ly/40Tv5IO
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7811136
Abstract :
The purpose of this study is to find out and
analyze further about the influence of management, work
environment and work discipline on employee
performance (case study: UPK Dinas Pengairan Dinas
Lingkungan Hidup DKI Jakarta Province). The research
method used today is quantitative research through
questionnaires. The basic population of this study is UPK
staff of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Irrigation Office with
a sample of 50 (fifty) respondents. The test was carried
out with validity and reliability tests, coefficient of
determination (R²) and hypothesis tests with the
SmartPLS 3.29 program. The results of this study showed
that: 1). Leadership has a positive and significant effect
on employee performance; 2). The work environment
does not affect employee performance; 3). Work
discipline has a positive and significant effect on employee
performance; 4). Leadership has a positive and
significant effect on work discipline; 5). The work
environment does not affect work discipline; 6). Work
discipline does not provide guidance in employee
performance; 7). Work discipline does not attach
importance to the work environment in relation to
employee performance. This research meets several
identified needs to examine how the influence of
leadership, work environment, work discipline and
employee performance is still needed in order to improve
and develop human resource management.
Keywords :
Leadership, Work Environment, Work Discipline, Employee Performance.
The purpose of this study is to find out and
analyze further about the influence of management, work
environment and work discipline on employee
performance (case study: UPK Dinas Pengairan Dinas
Lingkungan Hidup DKI Jakarta Province). The research
method used today is quantitative research through
questionnaires. The basic population of this study is UPK
staff of the DKI Jakarta Provincial Irrigation Office with
a sample of 50 (fifty) respondents. The test was carried
out with validity and reliability tests, coefficient of
determination (R²) and hypothesis tests with the
SmartPLS 3.29 program. The results of this study showed
that: 1). Leadership has a positive and significant effect
on employee performance; 2). The work environment
does not affect employee performance; 3). Work
discipline has a positive and significant effect on employee
performance; 4). Leadership has a positive and
significant effect on work discipline; 5). The work
environment does not affect work discipline; 6). Work
discipline does not provide guidance in employee
performance; 7). Work discipline does not attach
importance to the work environment in relation to
employee performance. This research meets several
identified needs to examine how the influence of
leadership, work environment, work discipline and
employee performance is still needed in order to improve
and develop human resource management.
Keywords :
Leadership, Work Environment, Work Discipline, Employee Performance.
