Authors : Asif Ali

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 4 - April

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/2j8xe4ak

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mrxsyhf6

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25apr303

Google Scholar

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 15 to 20 days to display the article.

Abstract : The study examines the role of seafarers in the adoption of green shipping practices in the maritime industry. It reveals that seafarers have varying levels of knowledge about environmentally friendly practices and the extent of their adoption varies across crews and vessels. The research emphasizes the need for comprehensive training programs, awareness campaigns, and incentives to encourage seafarers to engage in green shipping practices. However, the assurance of such programs varies among companies, indicating a need for more structured initiatives. The study also highlights the impact of shipping companies' sustainability initiatives and education programs on seafarers' roles. Sustainability initiatives significantly influence seafarers' responsibilities, emphasizing the adoption of new operational methods and technologies to reduce environmental threats. Education and training programs are crucial in equipping seafarers with the necessary skills and mindset to adapt to evolving industry requirements and sustainability measures. Seafarers' perceptions of environmental impact shape their conduct and participation in green activities onboard ships, contributing to a culture of environmental responsibility and innovation within the maritime sector. However, limitations such as sample size and scope warrant further research to explore specific training needs, program effectiveness, implementation barriers, and the long- term impact of green shipping practices on environmental sustainability metrics.

Keywords : Green Shipping Practices, Sustainability, Perceptions of the Environment, Green Shipping Training Programs.

References :

1. Alderton, T., Centre, S.I.R., Office, I.L., 2004. The Global Seafarer. International Labour Organization.
2. Andersson, K., Brynolf, S., Lindgren, F., Wilewska-Bien, M., 2016. Shipping and the Environment. Springer.
3. Baumann, Jennifer. "From global to human factors: Shipping emissions policy process in the IMO." Marine Policy 167 (2024): 106291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106291
4. Brooks, M.R., 1989. Seafarers in the ASEAN Region. Institute of Southeast Asian.
5. Celik, Metin. "A hybrid design methodology for structuring an Integrated Environmental Management System (IEMS) for shipping business." Journal of Environmental Management 90.3 (2009): 1469-1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.10.005
6. Chen, Wang, and Xian-Xun Yuan. "Eco-efficiency assessment of long-life asphalt pavement technologies." Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 122 (2023): 103874.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2023.103874
7. Chiu, R.H., Lin, L.H. and Ting, S.C., 2014. Evaluation of green port factors and performance: a fuzzy AHP analysis. Mathematical problems in engineering, 2014.
8. Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., Pentsov, D.A., 2007. Maritime Work Law Fundamentals: Responsible Shipowners, Reliable Seafarers. Springer Science & Business Media.
9. Cui, R., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Yang, Z., Fan, S. and Shu, Y., 2022. The impact of   marine engine noise exposure on seafarer fatigue: A China case. Ocean Engineering, pp 266.
10. Darbra, R.M., Ronza, A., Stojanovic, T.A., Wooldridge, C. and Casal, J., 2005. A procedure for identifying significant environmental aspects in sea ports. Marine pollution bulletin, 50(8), pp 866-874.
11. Didenko, O.V., 2023. PECULIARITIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL COMPETENCE OF FUTURE SEAFARERS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. Innovate Pedagogy 45–48.
12. European Sea Ports Organization Organisation (ESPO)., 2018. ESPO Environmental Report 2018.
13. Fredianelli, L.; Carpita, S.; Licitra, G., 2019. A procedure for deriving wind turbine noise limits by taking into account annoyance. Sci. Total Environ. 648, pp728–736.
14. Guo, Zijian, et al. "An integrated model for vessel traffic and deballasting scheduling in coal export terminals." Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 152 (2021): 102409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102409
15. Hildebrand, L.P., Brigham, L.W., Johansson, T.M., 2018. Sustainable Shipping in a Changing Arctic. Springer.
16. Lloyds Register., 2019. Global Marine Technology Trends 2030. Retrieved from https://www.lr.org/en-gb/insights/global-marine-technology-trends-2030/
17. Lloyd's Register., 2021. Green Shipping: Shipping with a reduced carbon footprint. Retrieved from https://www.lr.org/en-gb/resources/green-shipping/
18. Lun, Y.H.V., Lai, K.-H., Wong, C.W.Y., Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. Green Shipping Management. Springer.
19. Luo, M. and Yip, T.L., 2013. Ports and the environment. Maritime Policy & Management, 40(5), pp.401-403.
20. Luo, X., 2013. Energy-efficient ship operation. Springer Science & Business Media.
21. Moldanová, J., Hassellöv, I.M., Matthias, V., Fridell, E., Jalkanen, J.P., Ytreberg, E., Quante, M., Tröltzsch, J., Maljutenko, I., Raudsepp, U. and Eriksson, K.M., 2022. Framework for the environmental impact assessment of operational shipping. Ambio, pp.1-16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13280-021-01597-9
22. Navigation, U.States.Congress.House.C.O.M.M.A.Fisheries.S.O.C.G.A., 1980. Port Safety and Liquefied Gas Safety and Siting.
23. Ng, A.K. and Song, S., 2010. The environmental impacts of pollutants generated by routine shipping operations on ports. Ocean & Coastal Management, 53(5-6), pp301-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.03.002