Analysis of Written and Oral Expression Difficulties Among Learners in Secondary Schools in the Public Schools of the Prefecture of Kozah (Togo)


Authors : Yendouyamin Ponti; Mimboabe Bakpa

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 11 - November


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/3zykx273

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/w8hd8ndn

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25nov302

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : This study explores the difficulties of written and oral expression among secondary school learners in the public schools of the prefecture of Kozah in northern Togo, with the aim of highlighting the imbalance between linguistic, sociolinguistics and pragmatics skills of learners in French as a second language learning situations. In order to achieve this objective, an approach focused on communicative competence has been adopted. The data collection focused on semi- structured interviews, observation of teaching sequences and analysis of written and oral productions of students. The results demonstrated that there is a scarcity of interactions in French outside the school setting. In addition, teaching practices that are not very focused on expression, the lack of appropriate resources, and emotional blockages hinder the development of language autonomy. These combined factors delay the development of learners' communicational competences. In addition, the analysis revealed that the sometimes, transmissive pedagogical approach does not promote spontaneous expression or linguistic creativity. The result is a low appropriation of linguistic tools and an excessive dependence on prescriptive models. These findings have significant implications in the process of acquiring learners' written and oral skills. This study presents a redesign of didactic devices for the benefit of an action-oriented pedagogy that values authentic production and interaction in class, in accordance with the principles of the Skills-based Approach, highlighting the urgency to rethink pedagogical practices in order to create more authentic, interactive and differentiated learning situations.

Keywords : Communicative Competence; Written and Oral Expression; French as a Second Language; Action-Oriented Pedagogy; Linguistic Skills.

References :

  1. BARDIN Laurence, 2013, L’analyse de contenu, Paris : PUF.
  2. BESSE Henri, & PORQUIER Rémy, 2004, Grammaire et didactique des langues, Paris : Didier.
  3. BLACK Paul, & WILIAM Dylan, 1998, Assessment and classroom learning, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
  4. BLANCHET Alain, & GOTMAN Anne, 2015, L’enquête et ses méthodes : l’entretien, Paris : Armand Colin.
  5. BOURDIEU Pierre, 1997, Sur l’État : Cours au Collège de France (1989–1992), Paris : Seuil.
  6. BRETT Paul, 1997, A comparative study of the effects of the use of multimedia on listening comprehension, System, 25(1), 39–53.
  7. BRONCKART Jean-Paul, 1996, Activité langagière, textes et discours : pour un interactionnisme socio-discursif, Lausanne : Delachaux & Niestlé.
  8. CANALE Michael et SWAIN Merrill, 1980, Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing, Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
  9. CHAPELLE Carol, 2003, English Language Learning and Technology: Lectures on Applied Linguistics in the Age of Information and Communication Technology, Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
  10. CHARTRAND Suzanne-Geneviève, BLAIN Raymond et SIMARD Denis, 2015, Didactique du français langue première, Québec : Presses de l’Université Laval.
  11. CHOMSKY Noam, 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, Cambridge (MA) : MIT Press.
  12. CONSEIL DE L’EUROPE, 2001, Cadre européen commun de référence pour les langues : Apprendre, enseigner, évaluer, Paris : Didier.
  13. CUQ Jean-Pierre et GRUCA Isabelle, 2005, Cours de didactique du français langue étrangère et seconde, Grenoble : Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
  14. DABÈNE Louise, 1994, Repères sociolinguistiques pour l’enseignement des langues, Paris : Hachette.
  15. DIALLO Ibrahima, 2011, Teaching in a multilingual environment: Teachers' beliefs and classroom practices in Senegal, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32(2), 141–154.
  16. DJIBO Maman, 2013, Les problèmes de l’enseignement du français en Afrique, Education and Science Journal for Policy Review and Curriculum Development, Vol3, No2, August 2013.
  17. DOLZ Joaquim et SCHNEUWLY Bernard, 1998, Pour un enseignement de l’oral : Initiation aux genres formels à l’école, Paris : ESF.
  18. DÖRNYEI Zoltán, 2001, Motivational strategies in the language classroom, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  19. DOROTA Danuta, 2023, Didactique du lexique et enseignement des langues, Paris : Éditeur.
  20. ELLIS Rod, 2006, Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective, TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83–107.
  21. FILLIETTAZ Laurent, 2001, Apprentissages et pratiques langagières en contexte scolaire, Berne : Peter Lang.
  22. GUMPERZ John Joseph, 1982, Discourse Strategies, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  23. HORWITZ Elaine K., 2001, Language Anxiety and Achievement, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112–126.
  24. HYMES Dell, 1972, On Communicative Competence, dans J. B. PRIDE & J. HOLMES (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 269–293), Harmondsworth : Penguin.
  25. KERBRAT-ORECCHIONI Catherine, 2005, Le discours en interaction, Paris : Armand Colin.
  26. KRASHEN Stephen, 1982, Principles and practice in second language acquisition, Oxford : Pergamon.
  27. LAFONTAINE Louise & DUMAIS Catherine, 2014, Le développement du vocabulaire au primaire et au secondaire : pratiques efficaces et pistes didactiques, Revue de Didactique du Français, 12(2), 45–62.
  28. LAUFER Batia, 2017, Vocabulary in a Second Language: Selection, Acquisition, and Testing, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  29. LIGHTBOWN Patsy M. & SPADA Nina, 2013, How Languages are Learned (4th ed.), Oxford : Oxford University Press.
  30. LONG Michael H., 1996, The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition, dans W. C. RITCHIE & T. K. BHATIA (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468), San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
  31. MAYER Richard E., 2001, Multimedia Learning, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  32. MOORE David, 2006, Plurilinguismes et école, Paris : Didier.
  33. MOORE David, 2006, Teaching and learning in sub-Saharan Africa: The challenge of effective pedagogy, Paris : UNESCO.
  34. NATION I. S. P., 2001, Learning Vocabulary in Another Language, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  35. NOYAU Catherine, 2017, Acquisition et didactique du français langue seconde, Paris : Didier.
  36. NOYAU Catherine, 2017, Langues, éducation et société en Afrique : une approche sociolinguistique, Paris : L’Harmattan.
  37. ODLIN Terence, 1989, Language Transfer: Cross-Linguistic Influence in Language Learning, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  38. PIAGET Jean, 1972, The psychology of the child, New York : Basic Books.
  39. PUREN Claude, 2009, La perspective actionnelle et l’approche par les tâches en didactique des langues, Paris : Éditions Maison des Langues.
  40. REUTER Yves, 2000, Didactique de l’écrit, Paris : Nathan.
  41. ROEGIERS Xavier, 2000, Une pédagogie de l’intégration : Compétences et intégration des acquis dans l’enseignement, Bruxelles : De Boeck.
  42. ROEGIERS Xavier, 2010, L’Approche par compétences dans l’enseignement : un bilan de dix ans de mise en œuvre, Bruxelles : De Boeck.
  43. VAN DER MAREN Jean-Marie, 1996, Méthodes de recherche pour l’éducation, Montréal : Presses de l’Université de Montréal.
  44. VYGOTSKY Lev S., 1978, Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

This study explores the difficulties of written and oral expression among secondary school learners in the public schools of the prefecture of Kozah in northern Togo, with the aim of highlighting the imbalance between linguistic, sociolinguistics and pragmatics skills of learners in French as a second language learning situations. In order to achieve this objective, an approach focused on communicative competence has been adopted. The data collection focused on semi- structured interviews, observation of teaching sequences and analysis of written and oral productions of students. The results demonstrated that there is a scarcity of interactions in French outside the school setting. In addition, teaching practices that are not very focused on expression, the lack of appropriate resources, and emotional blockages hinder the development of language autonomy. These combined factors delay the development of learners' communicational competences. In addition, the analysis revealed that the sometimes, transmissive pedagogical approach does not promote spontaneous expression or linguistic creativity. The result is a low appropriation of linguistic tools and an excessive dependence on prescriptive models. These findings have significant implications in the process of acquiring learners' written and oral skills. This study presents a redesign of didactic devices for the benefit of an action-oriented pedagogy that values authentic production and interaction in class, in accordance with the principles of the Skills-based Approach, highlighting the urgency to rethink pedagogical practices in order to create more authentic, interactive and differentiated learning situations.

Keywords : Communicative Competence; Written and Oral Expression; French as a Second Language; Action-Oriented Pedagogy; Linguistic Skills.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
30 - November - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe