Authors : Dr. Vinay V Sherlekar; Dr. Sanath Kumar Shetty

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 10 - October

---

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/cyxmnjcb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/3x4s7783

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT722

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

---

Abstract : The assessment of anterior pelvic tilt (APT) is crucial in diagnosing and treating various musculoskeletal disorders. This paper evaluates the sensitivity of measuring APT using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray techniques. By comparing the two modalities, we aim to determine the advantages and limitations of each in clinical practice. Our findings suggest that MRI offers greater sensitivity in measuring APT, providing valuable insights for clinicians in selecting the appropriate imaging modality.

References :

1. Kjaer, P., et al. (2005). "The prevalence of MRI-detected spinal pathology in asymptomatic subjects: A population-based study." European Spine Journal, 14(4), 407-413.
2. Kauffman, J. I., et al. (2018). "Assessing pelvic tilt and lumbar lordosis in patients with low back pain using MRI." American Journal of Roentgenology, 210(5), 1051-1058.
3. Lee, S. W., et al. (2019). "Comparison of MRI and X-ray for measuring pelvic tilt." Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14(1), 1-7.
4. Neumann, D. A. (2010). Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
5. Wang, T., et al. (2020). "Comparison of radiographic and MRI measures of pelvic tilt and its clinical relevance." Journal of Radiology, 265(3), 837-844.