Authors : Dr. Vibha Tiwari

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 9 - September

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/vn6j23mf

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26sep687

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : Waterlogging is an important abiotic stress that adversely affects plant growth, metabolism and productivity by restricting oxygen diffusion into the root zone. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is comparatively tolerant to flooding; however, prolonged waterlogging can cause hypoxia or anoxia, impaired respiration, reduced photosynthesis, nutrient imbalance and excessive generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Enhanced ROS production results in oxidative stress and can damage lipids, proteins, nucleic acids and cellular membranes. Rice plants counteract this oxidative damage through a complex antioxidant defence system consisting of enzymatic and non-enzymatic components. Major antioxidant enzymes include superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (POD), glutathione reductase (GR), monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR). Non-enzymatic antioxidants include ascorbate, glutathione, tocopherols, carotenoids, phenolic compounds and flavonoids. The present paper reviews the physiological and biochemical responses of rice to waterlogging, with particular emphasis on ROS generation and antioxidant defence mechanisms. Understanding these mechanisms is important for developing waterlogging-tolerant rice cultivars through conventional breeding, molecular approaches and biotechnological interventions.

Keywords : Rice, Waterlogging, Hypoxia, Reactive Oxygen Species, Antioxidant Defence, SOD, CAT, APX, Glutathione, Oxidative Stress.

References :

1. Apel, K., & Hirt, H. (2004). Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction.  Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55, 373–399.
2. Bailey-Serres, J., & V oesenek, L.A.C.J. (2008). Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 313–339.
3. Blokhina, O., Virolainen, E., & Fagerstedt, K.V . (2003). Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Annals of Botany, 91, 179–194.
4. Fukao, T., & Bailey-Serres, J. (2004). Plant responses to hypoxia—is survival a balancing act? Trends in Plant Science, 9, 449–456.
5. Gill, S.S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48, 909–930.
6. Noctor, G., & Foyer, C.H. (1998). Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 49, 249–279.
7. V oesenek, L.A.C.J., & Bailey-Serres, J. (2015). Flood adaptive traits and processes: an overview. New Phytologist, 206, 57–73.
8. Ismail, A.M., Singh, U.S., Singh, S., Dar, M.H., & Mackill, D.J. (2013). The contribution of submergence-tolerant (Sub1) rice varieties to food security in flood-prone rainfed lowland areas. Field Crops Research, 152, 83–93.
9. Sairam, R.K., Kumutha, D., Ezhilmathi, K., Deshmukh, P.S., & Srivastava, G.C. (2008). Physiology and biochemistry of waterlogging tolerance in plants. Biologia Plantarum, 52, 401–412.
10. Colmer, T.D., & Greenway, H. (2011). Plant responses to waterlogging. Annals of Botany, 107, 1–2.
11. Bailey-Serres, J., Lee, S.C., & Brinton, E. (2012). Waterproofing crops: effective flooding survival strategies.  Plant Physiology, 160, 1698–1709.
12. Fukao, T., Yeung, E., Bailey-Serres, J., & Vanlerberghe, G.C. (2011). A rapid decrease in temperature induces anaerobic metabolism and modifies ROS production in plants. Plant Physiology, 156, 158–168.
13. Mittler, R. (2002). Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 7, 405–410.
14. Mittler, R. (2017). ROS are good. Trends in Plant Science, 22, 11–19.
15. Foyer, C.H., & Noctor, G. (2005). Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: a re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant, Cell & Environment, 28, 1056–1071.
16. Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, M.A., da Silva, J.A.T., & Fujita, M. (2012). Plant response and tolerance to abiotic oxidative  stress:  antioxidant  defense  is  a  key  factor.  In  Crop  Stress  and  Its  Management:  Perspectives  and Strategies.
17. Gill, S.S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Polyamines and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 5, 26–33.
18. Bailey-Serres,  J.,  &  Colmer,  T.D.  (2014).  Plant  tolerance  of  flooding  stress—recent  advances.  Plant,  Cell  & Environment, 37, 2211–2215.
19. Colmer, T.D., Armstrong, W., Greenway, H., Ismail, A.M., & Jackson, M.B. (2014). Physiological mechanisms of flooding tolerance in plants. Annals of Botany, 112, 1–12.
20. Yang, C., et al. (2017). Mechanisms of plant adaptation to flooding stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 117, 1–9.
21. Huang, S., Greenway, H., Else, M.A., & Jackson, M.B. (2003). Constitutive or inducible formation of aerenchyma in roots of rice subjected to waterlogging. Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 1617–1627.
22. Jackson, M.B., & Ram, P.C. (2003). Physiological and molecular basis of susceptibility and tolerance of rice plants to complete submergence. Annals of Botany, 91, 227–241.
23. Loreti, E., van Veen, H., & Perata, P. (2016). Plant responses to flooding stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 33, 64–71.
24. Bailey-Serres, J., & Lee, S.C. (2011). Transcription factors and oxygen sensing in plants. New Phytologist, 190, 517–521.
25. Huang, S., Greenway, H., & Colmer, T.D. (2008). Responses of roots to waterlogging and associated oxidative stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 46, 1–10.