Application of Molecular Markers for the Identification of Resistant Cowpea Varieties Against Fusarium Wilt in the Sudano-Sahalian Zone of Cameroon


Authors : Metsena Pierre; Sobda Gonné; Philippe Kosma; Fankou Dougoua Merline Yoyo; Ba-Ada Sawil

Volume/Issue : Volume 9 - 2024, Issue 5 - May

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/548da65j

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yhcncn2m

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24MAY2405

Abstract : The current study aims to determine four cowpea varieties status under fusarium wilt disease by using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) molecular markers potentially associated to cowpea resistant gene. Plant material was constituted by ten cowpea varieties with four varieties developed by the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development and six imported varieties from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. The experiment was carried out in completely randomized block with three replications. Infestation was performed by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp tracheiphilum isolate identified as the more virulent in the Far-North Region of Cameroon. The plants’ DNA was extracted by FTA Plantsaver cards method. Severity scale of the disease was noted from 0 to 5. The analysis of variance has revealed that significant differences exist among tested varieties as far as disease severity concern. IR15MA33, IT99K-573-2-1, IT82E-18 and IR15MA02 varieties with respectively 4.00, 3.67, 3.33 and 3.00 severity were identified susceptible. TVU109, IT98-503-1, CB46 and TV410 varieties with respectively 1.67, 1.67, 2.00 and 2.33 severities reveal the resistance signs against wilt fusarium. Among twenty-one tested markers, 2_31831, 2_27367 and 2_02374 have shown their potential associability to cowpea wilt fusarium resistance alleles. Potential parent’s resistant genes donors against this disease have revealed their resistance and relative information of different cowpea varieties status are henceforth available. Supplementary investigation is therefore necessary to establish genetic map of resistant gene.

Keywords : Screening; SNPs; Markers; Cowpea; Far-North Cameroon.

References :

  1. FAO, 2017. FAO Stat Database. [online] Available : http//www.Fao.org./satistic (november 2023).
  2. A.  Charrier, M. Jacquot, S. Hamon, and D. Nicolas. L’amélioration des plantes tropicales, Montpellier Cedex 1 France, CIRAD et ORSTOM, pp. 631, 1997.
  3. AGRISTAT, Annuaire des statistiques du secteur Agricole, Direction des Enquêtes et des Statistiques Agricoles, MINADER/AGRI-STAT, no. 18, pp. 123, 2022. [online] Available : www.minader.gov.cm/ (november, 2023).
  4. W. A. Englehard and S. S. Woltz, ”Fusarium wilt of chrysanthemum: Symptomatology and cultivar reactions”, Proceeding Florida State Horticultural Society, vol. 84, pp. 351-354, 1971. 
  5. S. M. Ana,  A. L. Mara, P. Priscila, V. Ehsan, S. Carmen, S. Zlatko, R. Diego, A. S. Susana, E. Fred van, and P. V. C. Maria,  “Grass pea natural variation reveals oligogenic resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi,” Plant Genome, vol. 14, e20154, 2021.
  6. F. O. Isalar, C. Okom, E. Omo-Udoyo, and E. A. Ataga, “Growth of Fusarium oxysporum (Schencht) and Phoma exigua (Desm) isolated from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in various concentration of six different sugars”, Journal of Food Science, Nutritional Science, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 317-324, 2021.
  7.  ]   P. Metsena, G. Sobda, P. Kosma, Y. M. D. Fankou, and L. Ndouvahad, “Identification of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. tracheiphilum strains responsible of cowpea wilt in Far-North Region of Cameroon”, Journal of Applied Bioscience, vol. 164, pp. 17001-17011, 2021.
  8. S. M. Ana, A. S. Susana, R. Diego, and P. V. C. Maria, “Fusarium Wilt Management in Legume Crops”, Agronomy Review, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1-25, 2020.
  9. V. A. Hinson, I. C. Mama, H. Lawan, F. Dossou, F. Gounongbé, P. Ayelo, and B. Fayomi, “Evaluation des indicateurs biologiques d’exposition aux pesticides organophosphorés et la fonction hépathique des agriculteurs de la commune de Gogounou au Nord-Est du Bénin”,  Journal de la Société de Biologie Clinique du Bénin, vol. 24, pp. 9-14, 2016.
  10. ]   O. F. Adeola, Global Impact of Chemicals and Toxic Substances on Human Health and the Environment. In : R. Haring, I. Kickbush, D. Ganten, M. Moeti (eds) Handbook of Global Health, Springer Cham, 2021. [online] Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45009-0_96.
  11. L. O. Omoigui, C. C. Danmaigona, A. Kamara, E. Ekefan, and M. Timko, “Genetic alanalysis of Fusarium wilt resistance in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Walp.)”, Plant breeding, vol 11, 2018
  12. ]   M. Pottorff, W. Steve, M. Q. Yaqin, D. Jeffrey, P. Ehlers, A. Roberts, and C. J. Timothy,  “Genetic and physical Mapping of Candidate Genes for Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. tracheiphilum Race 3 in Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp]”, Journal Pone , vol. 7, e41600, 2012.
  13. L. O. Omoigui, M. F. Ishiyaku, B. Ousmane, S. B. Gowda, and P. M. Timko, “Application of fast technology for analysis (FTA) for sampling and recovery of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) for molecular characterization of cowpea breeding lines for Striga resistance”, African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 85, pp. 19681-1986, 2011.
  14. U. C. Aguoru, O. L. Omoigui, and O. J. Olasan, ”Comparative optimized Protocols of DNA Etxraction and Purification Using FTA PlantSaver Card and DNAzol Methods for Eggplant (Solanum Species) Studies in North Central Nigeria,” Open Access Library Journal, vol. 2, 2015. [online] Available :el1406. http://dx-doi.org/10.4236/oalib.110406.
  15. S. S. Chloe, S. O. Florence, and Z. A. Elizabeth, ”Evaluation and Comparison of  FTA card and CTAB DNA Extraction Methods for Non-Agricultural Taxa”, Application in Plant Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, 2017.
  16. S. I. Adetiloye, J. O. Ariyo, O. C. Alake, O. O. Oduwaye, and O. S. Osewa, “Genetic diversity of some selected Nigeria cowpea using simple sequence reppeats (SSR) marker”, African Journal of Agricultural Research, vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 586-590, 2013.
  17. J. H. Degen, A. Deufel, D. Eisel, S. J. Grunewald, and J. Keesey, PCR Applications Manual, 3rd edition, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany, 334p, 2006.
  18. G. Dmitry, Y. Gennadiy, Z. Alexander, G. Anne, S. Valentin, P. Dmitry, A. Pavel, and M. Andrei, Manual Manufacturing of Oligonucleotide, DNA, and Protein Microchips, Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 250, pp. 203-211, 1997.
  19. A. D. Ndeve, Genetics of Resistance to Root-Knot Nematode and Fusarium Wilt in Cowpea Germoplasm From Mozambique, [Thèse de Doctorat PhD], University of California, Riverside, pp. 171, 2017.
  20. P. I. Assunçao, J. S. Michereff, G. S. E. Mizubuti, and H. S. Brommonschenkel,  ”Influencia da intensidade da murcha-de-fusario no rendimento do caupi”, Fitopatologia Brasileira, vol. 20, pp. 615-619, 2003.
  21. O. A. Ogaraku, 2008, ”Separate and Combined Effects of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. tracheiphilum and Meloidogyne incognita on Growth and Yield of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculta L. Walp) Var. Moussa-Local”, Plant Pathology Journal, vol. 7, no. 1, pp.114-117, 2008.
  22. A. B. Summerell, F. J. Leslie, Y. C. E. Liew, H. M. Laurence, S. Bullock, T. Petrovic, R. A. Bentle, G. C. Howard, A. S. Peterson, and L. J. Walsh, “Fusarium species associated with plants in Australia”, Fungal Divers vol. 46, pp. 1-27, 2011.
  23. M. A. Ajayi  and B. J. Evbenata,  ”Evaluation of heat treatment and bio-priming of cowpea seeds for the management of Fusarium wilt disease in the screen house”, Journal of Agricultural and Crop Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 20-32, 2020.
  24. B. Djilé, B. Ousmane, P. Kosma, and M. T. Ange-Patrice, 2016. ”Diversité Agrogénétique des Cultivars Locaux de Niébé (Vigna unguiculta) à l’Extrême-Nord du Cameroun », International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 255-268, 2016.
  25. A. Zakia, M. S. Abdul, G. Abdul, A. Amjad, and N. Mohammad, 2014. “Marker Assisted Selection (MAS) for chikpea Fusarium oxysporum wilt resistant genotypes using based molecular markers”, Molecular Bioloy Reports, vol. 41, pp.6755-6762, 2014.
  26.  D. Singh, B. Sinha, V. P. Rai, D. K. Singh, R. Kumar, and A. K. Singh, “Genetics of Fusarium Wilt (F. udum) Resistance in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) and Efficacy of Associated SSR Markers”, Plant Pathology Journal, vol. 32, no.1, pp. 1-7, 2016.
  27. P. Aditya, C. K. Sushil, T. Rakhi, R. Neha, M. Nupur, T. Mahender, R. P. Saabale, P. Umashanker, V. K. Rajeev, and P. N. Singh, “Marker-assisted introgression of resistance fusarium wilt race 2 in Pusa 256, an elite cultivar of desi chickpea”, Molecular Genetic Genomics, 2017. [online] Available: Doi:10.1007/s00438-017-1343-z.
  28. P. Parmar, S. Ankit, R. Preethi, D. Bhaumik, P. Ketankumar, S. B. Ramalingam, P. Arvind, and B. K. Kathiria, “Identification of a SSR marker (TOM-144) linked to Fusarium wilt resistance in Solanum lycopersicum”,  American Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 3, pp. 241-247, 2013.
  29. N. Manjunatha, T. K. Bangaswamy, N. Nagaraju, and Prameela, ”Validation of SSR Markers Linked to the Bean Common Mosaic Virus (BCMV) Resistance in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculta L.) Genotypes. [XXIII International Grassland Congress]. International Grassland Congress. New Dehli, India, https://uknowledge.uky.edu/igc/23/4-1-4/6 , (november, 2015)
  30. L. Vishal Bagde, J. S. Gahukar, and A. A. Akhare, “Marker Trait Correlation Study for Fusarium wilt Resistance in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)”, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2102-2118, 2018.
  31. S. K.Vinod, T. Sushma, K. M. Tripathi, G. Neha, S. R. Tomar, A. Ashok, and M. Yasin, “Molecular marker validation and identification of Fusarium wilt resistant chickpea genotypes”, Indian Journal of Genetics, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 163-172, 2020.
  32. O. M. Pottorff, L. Guojing, E. D. Jeffery, C. J. Timothy, and R. A. Philip, “Genetic mapping, synteny, and physical location of two loci for Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. Tracheiphilum race 4 resistance in cowpea [Vigna unguiculat (L.) Walp]”, Molecular Breeding, vol. 33, pp. 779-791, 2014.

The current study aims to determine four cowpea varieties status under fusarium wilt disease by using Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) molecular markers potentially associated to cowpea resistant gene. Plant material was constituted by ten cowpea varieties with four varieties developed by the Institute of Agricultural Research for Development and six imported varieties from the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture. The experiment was carried out in completely randomized block with three replications. Infestation was performed by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp tracheiphilum isolate identified as the more virulent in the Far-North Region of Cameroon. The plants’ DNA was extracted by FTA Plantsaver cards method. Severity scale of the disease was noted from 0 to 5. The analysis of variance has revealed that significant differences exist among tested varieties as far as disease severity concern. IR15MA33, IT99K-573-2-1, IT82E-18 and IR15MA02 varieties with respectively 4.00, 3.67, 3.33 and 3.00 severity were identified susceptible. TVU109, IT98-503-1, CB46 and TV410 varieties with respectively 1.67, 1.67, 2.00 and 2.33 severities reveal the resistance signs against wilt fusarium. Among twenty-one tested markers, 2_31831, 2_27367 and 2_02374 have shown their potential associability to cowpea wilt fusarium resistance alleles. Potential parent’s resistant genes donors against this disease have revealed their resistance and relative information of different cowpea varieties status are henceforth available. Supplementary investigation is therefore necessary to establish genetic map of resistant gene.

Keywords : Screening; SNPs; Markers; Cowpea; Far-North Cameroon.

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe