⚠ Official Notice: www.ijisrt.com is the official website of the International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) Journal for research paper submission and publication. Please beware of fake or duplicate websites using the IJISRT name.



Applications and Extensions of National Culture in the Shadow Economy


Authors : Dandoulaki Panagiota

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 3 - March


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4rks7bn4

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/d4fftbp5

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26mar480

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.


Abstract : This paper examines the correlation concerning national cultural dimensions and the shadow economy. Present in all countries, the shadow economy significantly influences economic development, prompting researchers to explore the factors that affect its magnitude. However, existing literature has largely neglected the association between national culture and the shadow economy. To investigate this connection, we will utilize regression analysis in conjunction with Hofstede's cultural dimensions. The volume of the shadow economy, expressed as a percentage of GDP, was evaluated using the MIMIC and CDA methods. Our correlation analysis reveals associations between the shadow economy and several cultural dimensions, including power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism versus collectivism, and longterm versus short-term normative orientation. Our contribution to the literature provides empirical evidence that cultural factors can elucidate the magnitude of the shadow economy across different countries. Based on our findings, we underscore the importance of cultivating national culture to mitigate the shadow economy. The identified relationships between the shadow economy and specific cultural dimensions deserves further investigation.

References :

  1. Achim, M.V. 2016. Cultural Dimension of Corruption. International Advance Economic Research 22: 333–45.
  2. Adam, M. C. & Ginsburgh, V. (1985). The Effects of Irregular Markets on Macroeconomic Policy: Some Estimates for Belgium. European Economic Review, 29(1), 15–33.
  3. Antonczyk, R.C. & Salzmann A.J. (2014). Overconfidence and Optimism: The effect of National Culture on Capital Structure. Research in International Business and Finance, 31, pp.132-151.
  4. Berger, Allen N., Li, Xinming., Morris, S.Charles. & Roman, A.Raluca. (2019). Lost in Translation: The effects of Cultural Values on Bank Failures around the World. Forthcoming, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.
  5. Buehn, A., Lessmann, Ch., & Markwardt, G. (2013). Decentralization and the shadow economy: Oates meets Allingham–Sandmo. Applied Economics, 45, 2567–2578.
  6. Dan, H. (2015). The Influence of Cultural Elements on Fiscal Behaviour in the European Union. Journal Modelling the New Europe 16:3–19.
  7. Dimitratos, P., Petrou, A., Plakoyiannaki, E. & Johnson, J.E. (2011). Strategic Decision-Making Processes in Internationalization: Does National Culture of the Focal Firm Matter? Journal of World Business, 46(2), pp.194-204.
  8. Dreher, A., & Schneider, F. (2010). Corruption and the shadow economy: an empirical analysis. Public Choice, 144, 215–38.
  9. Fidrmuc, J.P. & Marcus, J. (2010). Culture, Agency Costs and Dividends. Journal of Comparative Economics, 38(3), pp.321-339.
  10. Grinblatt, M. & Keloharju, M. (2001). What makes Investors Trade? Journal of Finance, 56 (2), pp.589-616.
  11. Guiso, L., Sapienza, P. & Zingales, L. (2009). Cultural biases in economic exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124, pp.1095-1131.
  12. Guiso, Luigi., Sapienza, Paola., & Zingales, Luigi. (2006). Does Culture affect Economic Outcomes? National Bureau of Economic Research, working paper no.11999.
  13. Hofstede, G.J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. (Rev.3rd edition), New York: McGraw-Hill.
  14. Hofstede, Geert (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2 (1).
  15. Kammas, Pantelis., Kazakis, Pantelis. & Sarantides, Vassilis. (2017). The effect of culture on fiscal redistribution: Evidence based on genetic, epidemiological and linguistic data. Economics Letters.Volume 160. Pages 95-99.
  16. Kanagaretnam, Kiridaran., Lim, Chee Yeow. & Lobo, Gerald J. (2011). Effects of National Culture on Bank Risk Taking. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.42(6), pp.853-874.
  17. Katsios, S. (2006). The Shadow Economy and Corruption in Greece. South-Eastern European Journal of Economics, 1, 61–80
  18. Kireenko, Anna. & Nevzorova, Ekaterina. (2015). Impact of Shadow Economy on Quality of Life: Indicators and Model Selection. Procedia Economics and Finance, Volume 25, Pages 559-568.
  19. Lavezzolo, S., Rodriguez-Lluesma, C. & Elvira, M.M. (2018). National culture and financial systems: The conditioning role of political context. Journal of Business Research, vol.23, pp.1167-1178.
  20. Lowe, S. (2001). In the Kingdom of the Blind, the One-eyed Man is King. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(3), pp.313-332.
  21. Medina, Leandro., & Schneider, Friedrich. (2018). Shadow Economies Around the World: What Did We Learn Over the Last 20 Years? ΙMF Working Paper.
  22. Réthi, G. (2012). Relation between Tax Evasion and Hofstede’s 4+2 Model. European Journal of Management 12.
  23. Richardson, G. (2008). The Relationship between Culture and Tax Evasion across Countries: Additional Evidence and Extensions. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 17: 67–78.
  24. Schneider, F., & Enste, D. (2000). Shadow Economies: Size, Causes, and Consequences. Journal of Economic Literature Vol. XXXVIII, March, 77–114.
  25. Schneider, F. (2007). Shadow economies and corruption all over the World: new estimates for 145 countries. Open-Assessment E-Journal, 1, 1–66.
  26. Schneider, F. (2008). Shadow Economies and Corruption all over the World: Empirical Results for 1999 to 2003. In special issue of the International Journal of Social Economics (IJSE), 35(9), 4.
  27. Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theory and Empirical Tests in 20 countries. Ιn M.Zanna (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol25, pp.1-65, New York: Academic Press.
  28. Seiler, M. et al.(2012). Fear, Shame and Guilt : Economic and Behavioral Motivations for Strategic Default. Real Estate Economics, 40, pp.199-233.
  29. Shao, L., Kwok, C.C.Y. & Guedhami, O. (2010). National Culture and Dividend Policy. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(8), pp.1391-1414.
  30. Siegel, J.I., Licht, N.A. & Schwartz, S.H. (2011). Egalitarianism and International Investment. Journal of Financial Economics, 102 (3), pp.621-642.
  31. Smith, P.B. (1996). National Cultures and the Values of Organizational Employees: Time for Another Look Ιn the P.Joynt and M.Warner (eds) Managing across Cultures: Issues and Perspectives, London: International Thomson Business Press.
  32. Sondergaard, M. (1994). Research Note: Hofstede’s Consequences: A Study of Reviews, Citations and Replications. Organization Studies, 15(3), pp.447-456.
  33. Sulganoa, A. (2016). The lag length structure of banking determinants of non-performing loans in the Czech Republic. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Finance and Banking, Silesian University, Karviná, pp.400–410.
  34. Tajaddin, Reza & Gholipour, E.Hassan. (2016). National Culture and Default on Mortgages. International Review of Finance, 17:1, pp.107-133.
  35. Tsakumis, G.T., A.P. Curatola, & T.M. Porcano. (2007). The Relation between National Cultural Dimensions and Tax Evasion. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 16: 131.
  36. Yeh, R.S. & Lawrence, J.J. (1995). Individualism and Confucian Dynamism: A Note on Hofstede’s Cultural Root to Economic Growth. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(3), pp.655-669.
  37. Zheng, X., Ghoul, S.E., Guedhami, O. & Kwok C.C.Y. (2011). National Culture and Corporate Debt Maturity. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36 (2), pp.468-488.

This paper examines the correlation concerning national cultural dimensions and the shadow economy. Present in all countries, the shadow economy significantly influences economic development, prompting researchers to explore the factors that affect its magnitude. However, existing literature has largely neglected the association between national culture and the shadow economy. To investigate this connection, we will utilize regression analysis in conjunction with Hofstede's cultural dimensions. The volume of the shadow economy, expressed as a percentage of GDP, was evaluated using the MIMIC and CDA methods. Our correlation analysis reveals associations between the shadow economy and several cultural dimensions, including power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism versus collectivism, and longterm versus short-term normative orientation. Our contribution to the literature provides empirical evidence that cultural factors can elucidate the magnitude of the shadow economy across different countries. Based on our findings, we underscore the importance of cultivating national culture to mitigate the shadow economy. The identified relationships between the shadow economy and specific cultural dimensions deserves further investigation.

Paper Submission Last Date
31 - March - 2026

SUBMIT YOUR PAPER CALL FOR PAPERS
Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe