Artificial Intelligence and Fragile Democracy in West Africa: Between Digital Repression and Citizen Mobilization


Authors : Etienne Fakaba Sissoko; Khalid Dembele

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 10 - October


Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4pk69cyb

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/2r6wadaa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25oct151

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.


Abstract : This article explores the ambivalence of artificial intelligence (AI) in the fragile democracies of West Africa, based on a qualitative study involving 385 participants in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. It highlights a dual use of AI: as a tool of digital repression (surveillance, censorship, disinformation) and as a lever for citizen mobilization (fact-checking, mapping, diaspora activism). This tension confirms that AI can both reinforce authoritarianism and support democratic action. The article introduces two concepts: contradicted algorithmic sovereignty, referring to African states’ structural dependence on foreign technologies; and algorithmic vulnerability, characterizing their increased exposure to digital manipulation. The study calls for an African regulatory framework on AI and for comparative, longitudinal research into its political uses in fragile contexts.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence; Algorithmic Governance; Digital Repression; Citizen Mobilization; Diaspora; West Africa; Contradicted Algorithmic Sovereignty; Algorithmic Vulnerability.

References :

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). The wrong kind of AI? Artificial intelligence and the future of labour demand. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 12(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsy034
  2. AfricTivistes. (2023). Rapport annuel sur la démocratie numérique en Afrique de l’Ouest. Dakar : AfricTivistes.
  3. Aning, K., & Atuobi, S. (2023). Hybrid regimes and fragile democracies in West Africa. African Security Review, 32(2), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2023.2223334
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  5. CDD West Africa. (2025). Artificial intelligence and democratic stability in West Africa: A game changer or a passing disruption? Abuja : Centre for Democracy and Development.
  6. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
  7. Diamond, L. (2019). Ill winds: Saving democracy from Russian rage, Chinese ambition, and American complacency. Penguin Press.
  8. Dubawa. (2024). AI and fact-checking in Nigeria: Lessons from the 2023 elections. Lagos : Dubawa Nigeria.
  9. Floridi, L. (2020). The logic of information: A theory of philosophy as conceptual design. Oxford University Press.
  10. Freedom House. (2023). Freedom on the Net 2023: The repressive power of artificial intelligence. Washington, DC : Freedom House.
  11. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
  12. Hiebert, M. (2023). Digital authoritarianism and the global South: Technology transfers and democracy at risk. Journal of Democracy, 34(3), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2023.0054
  13. Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087
  14. Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.
  15. Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the South: Epistemological perspectives for a fractured world. International Journal of Communication, 13, 5191–5209.
  16. Sissoko, E. F. (2025). LIBERTÉS EN EXIL, POUVOIR EN TREILLIS: Chronique d’un glissement autoritaire au Mali (2020–2025). Revue Internationale de la Recherche Scientifique et de l’Innovation (Revue-IRSI)3(3), 497-518.
  17. SISSOKO, E. F. (2025). DE LA TRANSITION À LA RÉGRESSION: La dissolution des partis politiques au Mali comme symptôme d’un autoritarisme légal. Revue Internationale de la Recherche Scientifique et de l’Innovation (Revue-IRSI)3(3), 625-641.
  18. Sissoko, E. F., & Konaté, M. (2025). When Silence Becomes Resistance : An Empirical Analysis of Adaptation and Resilience Mechanisms in Post-2020 Mali [Quand le silence devient résistance: Analyse Empirique des Mécanismes d'Adaptation et de Résilience au Mali Post-2020] (No. hal-05198659).
  19. Sissoko, E. F., & Dembélé, A. (2023). La digitalisation et le journalisme : L'impact des réseaux sociaux et du journalisme citoyen sur la scène médiatique malienne. Revue Francophone1(2).
  20. Dembele, K., Ballo, I., SISSOKO, E. F., & DEMBELE, A. (2024). Réseaux sociaux au Mali: Entre mobilisation politique et mécanismes de censure. Revue Internationale des Sciences de Gestion7(1).
  21. Union africaine. (2022). Rapport sur la cybersécurité et la protection des données en Afrique. Addis-Abeba : Commission de l’Union africaine.
  22. VIGINUM. (2022). Rapport du Comité éthique et scientifique sur l’activité du service de vigilance et de protection contre les ingérences numériques étrangères (2021–2022). Paris : Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale.
  23. WATHI. (2024). L’intelligence artificielle en Afrique de l’Ouest : Opportunités, risques et enjeux démocratiques. Dakar : Initiative citoyenne WATHI.
  24. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

This article explores the ambivalence of artificial intelligence (AI) in the fragile democracies of West Africa, based on a qualitative study involving 385 participants in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger. It highlights a dual use of AI: as a tool of digital repression (surveillance, censorship, disinformation) and as a lever for citizen mobilization (fact-checking, mapping, diaspora activism). This tension confirms that AI can both reinforce authoritarianism and support democratic action. The article introduces two concepts: contradicted algorithmic sovereignty, referring to African states’ structural dependence on foreign technologies; and algorithmic vulnerability, characterizing their increased exposure to digital manipulation. The study calls for an African regulatory framework on AI and for comparative, longitudinal research into its political uses in fragile contexts.

Keywords : Artificial Intelligence; Algorithmic Governance; Digital Repression; Citizen Mobilization; Diaspora; West Africa; Contradicted Algorithmic Sovereignty; Algorithmic Vulnerability.

CALL FOR PAPERS


Paper Submission Last Date
31 - December - 2025

Video Explanation for Published paper

Never miss an update from Papermashup

Get notified about the latest tutorials and downloads.

Subscribe by Email

Get alerts directly into your inbox after each post and stay updated.
Subscribe
OR

Subscribe by RSS

Add our RSS to your feedreader to get regular updates from us.
Subscribe