Authors : Ogunnaike Adekunle; Akinmoladun Ayokunle A.; Orimijupa Olawale D.; Adejare Oludele S.; Omoniyi Iyetunde; Ozomazro Julius U.; Dayomi, Mathew

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 6 - June

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/4cdn3dyc

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/yaew99wx

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun821

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Note : Google Scholar may take 30 to 40 days to display the article.

Abstract : The rapid urbanization of the 21st century has transformed human habitats into dense, built environments that often prioritize efficiency over well-being. Now over 55%—about 4.4 billion people—of the global population resides in cities, a figure projected to rise to 68% by 2050 (World Bank, 2025; United Nations, 2018). While urbanization drives economic growth, it has also been linked to rising mental health challenges, including chronic stress, anxiety, and depression (World Health Organization, 2021). Studies attribute this trend to factors such as reduced access to nature, sensory overload from noise and pollution, and the isolating effects of high-density living (Bratman et al., 2019). In response, architects and designers are increasingly turning to biophilic design—a holistic approach that integrates natural elements into built spaces—as a potential remedy for these urban mental health issues.

Keywords : Biophilic, Health, Urban Environment.

References :

1. Aduwo, E. B., Akinwole, O. O., & Okpanachi, P. O. (2021). Assessing workers’ productivity through biophilic design as a measure of sustainability in selected office buildings in Lagos state, Nigeria. 665(1), 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/665/1/012047
2. Al Khatib, I., Samara, F., & Ndiaye, M. (2024). A systematic review of the impact of therapeutical biophilic design on health and wellbeing of patients and care providers in healthcare services settings. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1467692
3. Alam, M. (2023). Biophilic architecture and designs for mental well-being. 1218. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1218/1/012020
4. Amadi, D. E., & Ichendu, C. (2024). Biophilic Architecture: A Sustainable Healing Strategy in Rehabilitation Centers in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Innovation in Science and Technology, 3(5), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.56397/ist.2024.09.02
5. Andrade, C. (2020). The limitations of online surveys. Indian journal of psychological medicine, 42(6), 575-576.
6. Andreucci, M. B., Loder, A., Brown, M., & Brajković, J. (2021). Exploring challenges and opportunities of biophilic urban design: Evidence from research and experimentation. Sustainability, 13(8), 4323. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU13084323
7. Asgari, M., Gale, R., Wild, K., Dodge, H., & Kaye, J. (2020). Automatic assessment of cognitive tests for differentiating mild cognitive impairment: a proof-of-concept study of the digit span task. Current Alzheimer Research, 17(7), 658-666.
8. Aydogan, A., & Cerone, R. (2021). Review of the effects of plants on indoor environments. Indoor and Built Environment, 30(4), 442-460.
9. Balwan, W. K., & Kour, S. (2021). A systematic review of hypertension and stress-the silent killers. Sch Acad J Biosci, 6, 150-154.
10. Barker, T. H., Stone, J. C., Sears, K., Klugar, M., Leonardi-Bee, J., Tufanaru, C., ... & Munn, Z. (2023). Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 21(3), 478-493.
11. Bijnens, E. M., Vos, S., Verheyen, V. V., Bruckers, L., Covaci, A., De Henauw, S., ... & Nawrot, T. S. (2022). Higher surrounding green space is associated with better attention in Flemish adolescents. Environment International, 159, 107016.
12. Bob, P. (2018, March 29). These hospitality spaces have taken biophilic design to a whole new level. TerraMai. https://terramai.com/blog/biophilic-design-in-hospitality/
13. Bolten, B., & Barbiero, G. (2020). Biophilic Design: How to enhance physical and psychological health and wellbeing in our built environments. 14. https://doi.org/10.13135/2384-8677/3829
14. Bratman, G. N., Anderson, C. B., Berman, M. G., Cochran, B., De Vries, S., Flanders, J., ... & Daily, G. C. (2019). Nature and mental health: An ecosystem service perspective. Science advances, 5(7), eaax0903.
15. Brown, R. L., Chen, M. A., Paoletti, J., Dicker, E. E., Wu-Chung, E. L., LeRoy, A. S., ... & Fagundes, C. P. (2022). Emotion regulation, parasympathetic function, and psychological well-being. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 879166.
16. Browning, W. D., Ryan, C. O., & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment. https://patterns.architexturez.net/doc/az-cf-172857
17. Cacique, M., & Ou, S. J. (2022). Biophilic design as a strategy for accomplishing the idea of healthy, sustainable, and resilient environments. Sustainability, 14(9), 5605.
18. Cheng, L. (2021, January 25). Glenn Murcutt, the ‘pavilion architect,’ on his MPavilion. ArchitectureAU. https://architectureau.com/articles/glenn-murcutt-mpavilion/
19. Curran, T., & Williams, T. L. (2020). Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. In The Routledge international encyclopedia of sport and exercise psychology (pp. 275-290). Routledge.
20. Dima, A. (2024, December 31). What is biophilic interior design? AweDeco. https://awedeco.com/what-is-biophilic-interior-design/
21. Donnelly, T. P., Ferguson, J., Collett, C., Garrett, V., & Neltner, T. (2022). Communities of work: Creating place in the workplace. Corporate Real Estate Journal, 12(1), 76-94.
22. Ekpo, N. O. (2023). Exploring The Incorporation of Biophilic Design Features in Orthopedic Hospitals to Accelerate Recovery.
23. Fell, D. (2022). Biophilic classrooms and student focus. Environment and Behavior, 54(1), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165211026982
24. Figueiredo, K., Pierott, R., Hammad, A. W., & Haddad, A. (2021). Sustainable material choice for construction projects: A Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment framework based on BIM and Fuzzy-AHP. Building and Environment, 196, 107805.
25. Guo, Q. (2024). Impact of the Natural Environment on Individuals’ Psychological Well-being. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54097/745k0n10
26. Houser, K. W., Boyce, P. R., Zeitzer, J. M., & Herf, M. (2021). Human-centric lighting: Myth, magic or metaphor. Lighting Research & Technology, 53(2), 97-118.
27. Huntsman, D. D., & Bulaj, G. (2022). Healthy Dwelling: Design of Biophilic Interior Environments Fostering Self-Care Practices for People Living with Migraines, Chronic Pain, and Depression. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2248. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042248
28. Ikudayisi, A. E., Chan, A. P., Darko, A., & Adedeji, Y. M. (2023). Integrated practices in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction industry: Current scope and pathway towards Industry 5.0. Journal of Building Engineering, 73, 106788.
29. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge university press.
30. Kellert, S., & Calabrese, E. (2015). The practice of biophilic design. London: Terrapin Bright LLC, 3(21), 2021-09.
31. Knezevic, E., Nenic, K., Milanovic, V., & Knezevic, N. N. (2023). The role of cortisol in chronic stress, neurodegenerative diseases, and psychological disorders. Cells, 12(23), 2726.
32. Largo-Wight, E., Chen, W. W., Dodd, V., & Weiler, R. (2016). Healthy workplaces: The effects of nature contact at work on employee stress and health. Public health reports, 126(1_suppl), 124-130.
33. Li, Z., Zhang, W., Cui, J., Wang, L., Liu, H., & Liu, H. (2024). Biophilic environment with visual-olfactory stimuli contributes to psychophysiological restoration and cognitive enhancement. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111202
34. Lin, C. (2023). Extracting the Sensory Characteristics of Waterscapes as a Potential Tool for Anxiety Mitigation (Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University).
35. McSweeney, J., Johnson, S., Sherry, S., Singleton, J., & Rainham, D. (2021). Indoor nature exposure and influence on physiological stress markers. International journal of environmental health research, 31(6), 636-650.
36. Melchionni, B. (2021). Integrating Ecological and Human Health: Restorative Environmental Design in Therapeutic Landscapes (Master's thesis, University of Georgia).
37. Mousighichi, P., Mousavi Samimi, P., & Mousapour, B. (2024). Impact of biophilic design parameters on university students’ place attachment and quality of campus life. The Journal of Architecture. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2024.2331505
38. Nafi, D. (2024). Architecture and Sustainability. Hasfa.
39. Namwad, S., Badrike, N. V., & Shinde, M. (2023). Biophilic Design and its Influence on Stress Reduction in High-Density Living Environment. Indian Scientific Journal of Research in Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem27692
40. Narula, R. K. (2024). Effectiveness of Biophilic Design as an Architectural and Design Approach to Enhance Mental Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.58445/rars.1401
41. Oliva, M. T., & Storm, B. C. (2023). Internet use and creative thinking in the alternative uses task. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(4), 796-811.
42. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
43. Panagopoulos, T., Sbarcea, M., & Herman, K. (2021). A biophilic mind-set for a restorative-built environment. 17, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.22616/J.LANDARCHART.2020.17.08
44. Periáñez, J. A., Lubrini, G., García-Gutiérrez, A., & Ríos-Lago, M. (2021). Construct validity of the stroop color-word test: influence of speed of visual search, verbal fluency, working memory, cognitive flexibility, and conflict monitoring. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 36(1), 99-111.
45. Pham, T. P. V., & Sanocki, T. (2024). Human Attention Restoration, Flow, and Creativity.
46. Shree F, A. (2019). Biophilic Architecture for Restoration and Therapy within the Built Environment: A Review. https://doi.org/10.20944/PREPRINTS201907.0323.V1
47. Söderlund, J., & Newman, P. (2022). How the biophilic design social movement informs planning, policy and professional practice. Sustainable Earth, 5(1), 4.
48. Song, Y., & Liao, C. (2022). Structural Materials, Ventilation Design and Architectural Art of Traditional Buildings in Guangdong, China. Buildings, 12(7), 900.
49. Tekin, B. H. (2022). Human-Centred Therapeutic Environments: A New Framework for Biophilic Design (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Liverpool (United Kingdom)).
50. Thani, S. K. S. O., & Salleh, N. M. (2024). Exploring the restorative spaces of biophilic campus landscapes in mitigating student stress. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 11(2), 233–254. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v12i1.1666
51. Thomas, C., & Xing, Y. (2021). To What Extent Is Biophilia Implemented in the Built Environment to Improve Health and Wellbeing? —State-of-the-Art Review and a Holistic Biophilic Design Framework (pp. 227–247). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8775-7_14
52. Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In Behavior and the natural environment (pp. 85-125). Boston, MA: Springer US.
53. Ulrich, R. S. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. science, 224(4647), 420-421.
54. United Nations (2018). 68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html (Accessed: 23 March 2025).
55. Wang, Z. H. (2023). A survey of factors and life cycle assessment in selection of green construction materials. Journal of Computational Intelligence in Materials Science, 1, 023-033.
56. World Bank (2025). Urban development. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopment/overview
57. World Health Organization (2021). Mental health and urbanisation: A growing challenge. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-and-urban-living (Accessed: 23 March 2025).
58. World Health Organization. (2022). Mental health: Strengthening our response. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response
59. Yassein, G., & Ebrahiem, S. (2018). Biophilic Design in the Built Environment to Improve Well-Being: A Systematic Review of Practices. 30(1), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.21608/JUR.2018.88412
60. Yin, J., Yuan, J., Arfaei, N., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2020). Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment international, 136, 105427.
61. Yin, J., Zhu, H., & Yuan, J. (2024). Health Impacts of Biophilic Design from a Multisensory Interaction Perspective: Empirical Evidence, Research Designs, and Future Directions. Land, 13(9), 1448. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13091448
62. Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141.