Authors : Rhem Rick N. Corpuz; Ramces V. Minaves; Ashley M. De Jesus; Paul Yanie G. Guevarra; Jan Lenard L. Pineda

Volume/Issue : Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/44csvj2s

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/wxdpa4e9

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jan261

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : The increasing prevalence of online fraud and scams disproportionately affects vulnerable groups, particularly retired adults. This study examines the multifaceted factors contributing to scam susceptibility within this demographic, including financial instability, digital literacy, social isolation, and life transitions. Utilizing a mixed-method approach, the research incorporates quantitative analyses, such as correlation and regression, alongside qualitative thematic exploration to identify both risk and protective factors. The study identifies several risk factors contributing to increased scam victimization among retired adults, including limited digital literacy, lack of scam awareness, and cognitive decline. It notes that access to retirement funds also poses a risk but is less concerning to participants compared to other factors. The research underscores the importance of digital skills, awareness of common scams, and strong social support networks in mitigating these risks. To combat these vulnerabilities, the study advocates for targeted educational campaigns and the development of enhanced social support systems specifically tailored to the needs of older adults. It highlights the crucial role of social guardians, such as family members and financial advisors, in providing regular engagement and financial guidance to prevent scams. The study recommends a multifaceted approach to address the unique needs of retired individuals, focusing on improving digital literacy, fostering community connections, and implementing accessible programs that support online transactions. Efforts to reduce social isolation through community engagement are seen as vital to mitigating risks associated with limited social support. Moreover, the research calls for continued exploration into how demographic factors influence scam susceptibility and the development of inclusive, effective intervention strategies

Keywords : Scam Victimization, Retired Adults, Risk Factors, Protective Factors, Targeted Interventions, Prevention Strategies, Decision-Making Vulnerabilities.

References :

1. Ancira, J. (2017). Exploring the caregiver caring for the aged: Experience through Social Media Forum (Doctoral dissertation, Texas State University).
2. Akdemir, N., & Yenal, S. (2020). CARD-NOT-PRESENT FRAUD VICTIMIZATION: A ROUTINE ACTIVITIES APPROACH TO UNDERSTAND THE RISK FACTORS. Güvenlik Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 243-268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28956/gbd.736179
3. Boyce, B. (2019). Identifying and Protecting Senior Citizens and Vulnerable Adults from Financial Exploitation (Master's thesis, Utica College).
4. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input.
5. Burnes, D., Henderson Jr, C. R., Sheppard, C., Zhao, R., Pillemer, K., & Lachs, M. S. (2017). Prevalence of financial fraud and scams among older adults in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of public health, 107(8), e13-e21.
6. Burton, A., Cooper, C., Dar, A., Mathews, L., & Tripathi, K. (2022). Exploring how, why, and in what contexts older adults are at risk of financial cybercrime victimisation: A realist review.
7. Button, M., Lewis, C., & Tapley, J. (2009). Fraud typologies and the victims of fraud: Literature review.
8. Bouska, R. C. (2023). Retirement Adjustment in Parents Estranged From Adult Children: A Generic Qualitative Study (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).
9. Clarke, R. E., Holmquist, L. E., & Vines, J. (2021, May). Circumspect users: Older adults as critical adopters and resistors of technology.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).
11. Cross, C. (2016). 'They're very lonely': Understanding the fraud victimisation of seniors. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 5(4), 60-75.
12. DeLiema, M. (2018). Elder fraud and financial exploitation: Application of routine activity theory. The Gerontologist, 58(4), 706-718.
13. DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2017). Exploring the risks and consequences of elder fraud victimization: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study. Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper, (2017-364), 2018-06.
14. DeLiema, M., Deevy, M., Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2020). Financial fraud among older Americans: Evidence and implications. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(4), 861-868.
15. Dequanter, S., Fobelets, M., Steenhout, I., Gagnon, M. P., Bourbonnais, A., Rahimi, S., ... & Gorus, E. (2022). Determinants of technology adoption and continued use among cognitively impaired older adults: a qualitative study.
16. Ebner, N. C., Pehlivanoglu, D., & Shoenfelt, A. (2023). Financial Fraud and deception in aging. Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods.
17. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling.
18. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program.
19. Fenge, L., & Lee, S. (2018). Understanding the risks of financial scams as part of elder abuse prevention.
20. INRA Investor Education Foundation. (2020). Financial fragility may put older adults at risk for scam victimization.
21. https://www.finrafoundation.org/sites/finrafoundation/files/Financial-Fragility-Research-Brief.pdf
22. High vulnerability to government impersonation scams among older adults. (2024b, April 11). National Institute on Aging.
23. https://www.nia.nih.gov/news/high-vulnerability-government-impersonation-scams-among-older-adults
24. Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., Mears, D. P., & Wolfe, S. E. (2014). Financial exploitation of the elderly in a consumer context. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
25. Judges, R. A., Gallant, S. N., Yang, L., & Lee, K. (2017). The role of cognition, personality, and trust in fraud victimization in older adults. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 588.
26. Judges, R. (2021). Scams and Aging: Factors Impacting Effective Decision Making.
27. Kemp, S. (2022). Fraud reporting in Catalonia in the Internet era: Determinants and motives. European Journal of Criminology, 19(5), 994-1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820941405
28. König, R., Seifert, A., & Doh, M. (2018). Internet use among older Europeans: an analysis based on SHARE data.
29. Kullgren, J., Solway, E., Roberts, S., Singer, D., Kirch, M., Box, N., ... & Hutchens, L. (2023). National Poll on
30. Lam, M. K., Hines, M., Lowe, R., Nagarajan, S., Keep, M., Penman, M., & Power, E. (2016).
31. Preparedness for eHealth: Health sciences students' knowledge, skills, and confidence. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research.
32. Lee, J., & Soberon‐Ferrer, H. (1997). Consumer vulnerability to fraud: Influencing factors. Journal of consumer affairs, 31(1), 70-89.Healthy Aging: Experiences with Scams Among Older Adults.
33. Lichtenberg, P. A., Hall, L., Gross, E., & Campbell, R. (2019). Providing assistance for older adult financial exploitation victims: Implications for clinical gerontologists. Clinical Gerontologist, 42(4), 435-443.
34. Lusardi, A., Mitchell, O. S., & Oggero, N. (2020). Debt and financial vulnerability on the verge of retirement. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 52(5), 1005-1034.
35. Lichtenberg, P. A., Stickney, L., & Paulson, D. (2013). Is psychological vulnerability related to the experience of fraud in older adults?. Clinical gerontologist, 36(2), 132-146.
36. Lyons, C. (2019). Cyber-enabled financial abuse of older Americans: A public policy problem..
37. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice.
38. Phelan, A., O'Donnell, D., & McCarthy, S. (2023). Financial abuse of older people by third parties in banking institutions: a qualitative exploration.
39. Schlomann, A. L. (2018). Older adults’ preferences towards using digital technologies.
40. Shao, J., Zhang, Q., Ren, Y., Li, X., & Lin, T. (2019). Why are older adults victims of fraud? Current knowledge and prospects regarding older adults’ vulnerability to fraud. Journal of elder abuse & neglect, 31(3), 225-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2019.1625842
41. Sharit, J., Moxley, J. H., Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Rogers, W. A., & Czaja, S. J. (2019). Effects of extended use of an age-friendly computer system on assessments of computer proficiency, attitudes, and usability by older non--computer users. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 12(2), 1-28.
42. Simmons, A. (2005). Grandparent foster caregiver characteristics, differences between foster caregivers, and predictors of satisfaction with social support (Doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia).
43. Spica, E. (2022). The Influence of Technological Savviness and Home Internet Access on Student Preferences for Print or Digital Course Materials. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 34(1), 81-96.
44. Spreng, R. N., Ebner, N. C., Levin, B. E., & Turner, G. R. (2021). Aging and financial exploitation risk.
45. Sur, A., DeLiema, M., & Brown, E. (2021). Contextual and social predictors of scam susceptibility and fraud victimization. Available at SSRN 4053903.
46. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples.
47. Ueno, D., Daiku, Y., Eguchi, Y., Iwata, M., Amano, S., Ayani, N., Nakamura, K., Kato, Y., Matsuoka, T., & Narumoto, J. (2021). Mild cognitive decline is a risk factor for scam vulnerability in older adults.
48. Ueno, D., Arakawa, M., Fujii, Y., Amano, S., Kato, Y., Matsuoka, T., & Narumoto, J. (2022). Psychosocial characteristics of victims of special fraud among Japanese older adults.
49. Xin, Y., Xia, Y., & Chai, Y. (2024). Routine activities and fraud re-victimization among older adults.
50. Yu, L., Mottola, G., Barnes, L. L., Valdes, O., Wilson, R. S., Bennett, D. A., & Boyle, P. A. (2022). Financial fragility and scam susceptibility in community-dwelling older adults.
51. Yu, L., Mottola, G., Kieffer, C. N., Mascio, R., Valdes, O., Bennett, D. A., & Boyle, P. A. (2023). Vulnerability of older adults to government impersonation scams. JAMA Network Open, 6(9), e2335319-e23353