Authors : Cherrie Mae A. Reamor; Danilo E. Despi

Volume/Issue : Volume 11 - 2026, Issue 1 - January

Google Scholar : https://tinyurl.com/mr2m6z9d

Scribd : https://tinyurl.com/mtb5su2f

DOI : https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/26jan106

Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.

Abstract : This study explored graduate students’ scholastic satisfaction across five strategic domains: instructional quality, faculty support, institutional flexibility, resource accessibility, and holistic well-being. Quantitative ratings reveal high appreciation for faculty expertise (X̅ = 4.76), curriculum relevance (X̅ = 4.72), and research integration (X̅ = 4.64), underscoring the value of critical thinking, real-world application, and scholarly engagement. Faculty mentorship (X̅= 4.56) and institutional flexibility (X̅= 4.55) emerged as pivotal in supporting academic and personal balance. While services and facilities received a lower rating (X̅= 4.14), students emphasized the need for improved digital infrastructure and classroom environments. Key challenges include financial instability, limited academic guidance, and emotional strain, yet students demonstrate resilience and commitment to their goals. Findings highlighted the importance of personalized instruction, diverse assessment methods, and interactive teaching formats. Students strongly endorse institutional enhancements in mental health services (X̅ = 4.61), digital transformation (X̅ = 4.57), and research funding (X̅ = 4.57), alongside calls for transparent feedback mechanisms. Conclusions affirm that faculty engagement, flexible policies, and well-maintained resources foster academic success and emotional well-being. Recommendations include expanding mentorship, upgrading facilities, diversifying instructional strategies, and implementing holistic support systems. These insights advocate for a responsive, student-centered approach to graduate education that integrates innovation, empathy, and strategic alignment with learners’ evolving needs.

Keywords : Graduate Education, Faculty Mentorship, Instructional Quality, Institutional Flexibility, Student Satisfaction, Mental Health, Digital Infrastructure.

References :

1. Adams, P., & Lee, J. (2019). Facilities and sense of belonging in graduate education. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 56(3), 245–260.
2. Almahasees, Z., Mohsen, K., & Amin, M. O. (2021). Faculty members’ and students perceptions of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 10(1), 1–18.
3. Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2019). The internationalization of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 23(1), 5–  21.
4. Atobatele, F. A., Kpodo, P. C., & Eke, I. O. (2024). Strategies for enhancing international student retention. Open Access Research Journal of Science and Technology, 10(2), 35–45.
5. Bueno, D. C. (2018). Ascertaining the Curriculum Relevance of the Graduate School through Tracer Study in a Philippine Private Higher Education Institution. Retrieved from ResearchGate.
6. Bueno, D. C. (2018). Associating students’ satisfaction and quality of graduate educational services in a Catholic higher educational institution in the Philippines. International Journal of Education and Research, 6(1), 84–102.
7. Bueno, D. C. (2023). Enhancing graduate school experience: A comprehensive evaluation of student satisfaction with services and facilities. IMRaD Journal, 4, 1–20.
8. Caballero, R. T. (2019). Student satisfaction and academic performance in graduate programs: A case study of a state university in Luzon. Asian Journal of Education and Research, 9(3), 33–47.
9. Castulo, N. J., Marasigan, A. C., Buenaventura, M. L. D., de Vera, J. L., Bagaporo, E. C., San Juan, M. P. C., & Dalida, N. S. (2025). Contextualizing the challenges of         education graduate students in the Philippines: Translating needs analysis into strategic solutions. Discover Education, 4(27). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00416-7
10. Chen, Y., & Li, H. (2020). Graduate student engagement and satisfaction in Chinese research universities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 40(1), 55–72.
11. Chung, Y. P., & Yet, M. (2009). Tracer study as a tool for evaluating graduate employability. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 491–502.
12. Cocal, C. J., Dulos, C. C., & Garin, R. P. (2021). Graduates’ level of satisfaction and degree programs’ contribution to their professional and personal growth. International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 4(2), 45–60.
13. Collins, D., & Rossi, F. (2019). Graduate student well-being and institutional climate in Canadian universities. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 49(2), 33–50.
14. Crosling, G., Heagney, M., & Thomas, L. (2020). Improving student retention in graduate education. Higher Education Academy Review, 12(2), 99–115.
15. Damoco, T. B., Agustin, M. L., & Ignacio, C. G. (2024). Philippine graduate students’ perspectives on CMO No. 15 Series 2019. Philippine Journal of Graduate Education, 8(1), 12–29.
16. Daniels, D. (2014). The multifaceted roles of Catholic school leaders: Essential skills and preparation. Journal of Catholic Education, 17(2), 123–145.
17. De Guzman, R. C. (2015). Academic advising and its impact on graduate student satisfaction. University Research Journal, 8(2), 76–89.
18. El-Hilali, N., Al-Jaber, S., & Hussein, L. (2015). Student satisfaction in Qatar’s graduate programs. International Education Studies, 8(3), 60–72.
19. Espinosa, K. A. (2025). An analysis of graduate outcomes under CHED’s BSIT program policies and standards. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 14(14), 1–20. https://consortiacademia.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/ v14i14/25239_ final.pdf
20. Hammer, D., Piascik, P., Medina, M. S., Pittenger, A., Rose, R. L., Creekmore, K., Soltis, D., Bouldin, A., Schwarz, L., & Scott, S. A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1060429.pdf
21. Heinz-Dieter Meyer, H., & Powell, W. (2018). Institutionalism and quality management in higher education. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1749217.
22. Johnson, D. R., Soldner, M., Leonard, J. B., & Alvarez, P. (2016). Examining sense of belonging among first-year undergraduates from different racial/ethnic groups.        Journal of College Student Development, 57(8), 925–939.
23. Koh, A., & Tan, S. (2016). Mentoring and academic support in Singaporean graduate schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 47, 88–95.
24. Llenaresas, M. B. (2021). Outcomes-Based Curricular Review of a Graduate Program Using Curriculum Quality Audit. Bicol University Journal. https://systems.bicol-u.edu.ph/journal/assets/journal_pdf/8%20Mina%20Bercasio%20Llenaresas_82 93.pdf
25. Llorin, M. V. (2023). Outcomes-based education and its effect on graduate student satisfaction. Philippine Journal of Educational Policy, 15(2), 90–105.
26. Manalo, F. J. (2021). The influence of campus facilities on graduate student engagement and satisfaction. Bicol Research Bulletin, 6(3), 40–55.
27. Minten, S., & Forsyth, J. (2014). Graduate employability: A complex phenomenon. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 15, 3–9.
28. Mladenovici, V., Woods, J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2022). Redefining learning: Student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602/full
29. Müller, K., & Schneider, B. (2021). Academic integration and satisfaction among German graduate students. European Journal of Education Research, 8(1), 22–38.
30. Müller, T., Schmidt, A., & Becker, F. (2018). Financial stress and academic performance in graduate students. European Journal of Education, 53(1), 89–102.
31. Murphy, M., Woods, J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2021). Student-centered learning in graduate science education. Frontiers in Education, 6.
32. Nguyen, T., & Tran, L. (2018). Student satisfaction in Vietnamese graduate education: A mixed-       methods study. Vietnam Journal of Education, 12(4), 101–117.
33. Paolini, A. (2015). Enhancing teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 20–33.
34. Reyes, M. A. (2020). Institutional support and graduate student success: A Philippine perspective. Philippine Journal of Higher Education, 12(1), 55–70.
35. Santiago, J. P. (2017). The role of student services in enhancing graduate education satisfaction. Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 5(2), 88–102.
36. Schomburg, H. (2010). Employability and quality of higher education: A review of the         literature. European Journal of Education, 45(4), 575–595.
37. Siriwardena, A., Edirisinghe, L., & Kurukulaarachchi, V. (2023). University choice and       satisfaction: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 15(2), 71–87.
38. Smith, C., & Bath, D. (2020). The role of academic resources in graduate student success. Studies in Higher Education, 45(2), 312–328.
39. Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2017). Graduate student satisfaction and institutional support in UK universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 29(3), 215–230.
40. Thompson, R., & Johnson, M. (2018). Counseling services and graduate student retention in U.S. institutions. Educational Psychology Review, 30(2), 145–160.
41. Tian, M., & Lowe, J. (2020). International graduate students’ adjustment and satisfaction in Australia. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 765–780.
42. Tolentino, A. S. (2018). Graduate education and institutional responsiveness: A study of student feedback mechanisms. Higher Education Review Philippines, 7(1), 12–28.
43. Villanueva, L. G. (2016). Graduate student perceptions of quality and satisfaction in higher education institutions. Sorsogon Educational Review, 3(1), 22–35.