Authors :
Adedokun A. Adebowale
Volume/Issue :
Volume 10 - 2025, Issue 12 - December
Google Scholar :
https://tinyurl.com/27puds8m
Scribd :
https://tinyurl.com/3cbj8mcs
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25dec1615
Note : A published paper may take 4-5 working days from the publication date to appear in PlumX Metrics, Semantic Scholar, and ResearchGate.
Abstract :
Governments looking to improve service delivery, lower transaction costs, and combat corruption, digitizing public
procurement has become a strategic goal. The Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) of Nigeria launched the Government
Electronic-Procurement & Payment System (GePPS) in 2017. The effectiveness of government procurement between 2016 and
2022 is empirically assessed in this study. The study concludes that digitalization decreased average procurement cycle time by
27% and bid prices by 6.4% while increasing the number of qualified bidders per tender by 38% using a mixed-method design
that incorporates difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis of 1,847 contracts with policy documents, academic literature, and
institutional reports. Qualitative data indicates that the main mechanisms are vendor pre-qualification, real-time monitoring,
and e-reverse auctioning. However, vendor reluctance, low digital literacy, and restricted internet coverage hinder
improvements. Policy ideas for expanding digital procurement while addressing structural limitations are included in the
paper's conclusion,
Keywords :
E-Procurement, Digitalization, Public Procurement Efficiency, Bureau of Public Procurement, Nigeria, GePPS.
References :
- AfDB. (2021). Digitalizing public procurement in Africa: Early lessons from Rwanda. African Development Bank Group. https://www.afdb.org
- Adeyemo, D. (2019). Corruption in Nigeria’s public procurement: Causes and consequences. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(3), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-04-2019-0021
- Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588
- Budget Office of the Federation. (2022). 2022 federal budget implementation report. Federal Ministry of Finance.
- Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
- Eze, S. C., & Eze, C. U. (2021). Electronic procurement adoption in Nigerian public sector: A conceptual framework. Electronic Government, 17(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2021.10012345
- Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
- ITU. (2022). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2022. International Telecommunication Union.
- Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
- OECD. (2019). ChileCompra: Impact assessment of electronic public procurement. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- OECD. (2021). Government at a glance 2021. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1f38a36f-en
- Ogbu, O. M. (2020). Public procurement reforms in Nigeria: Progress and challenges. Development Policy Review, 38(4), 521–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12456
- Pathak, R. D., & Prasad, U. S. (2022). E-government and corruption: A contingent approach. Government Information Quarterly, 39(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101115
- Srivastava, A., & Satyanarayana, K. (2022). Does online public procurement deliver? Evidence from India’s Government e-Marketplace. Journal of Development Economics, 158, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102116
- Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press.
- World Bank. (2020). Benchmarking public procurement 2020. World Bank Group.
- Zheng, Y., Schapper, P. R., & Liu, J. (2021). The impact of e-procurement on cost and time savings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Public Procurement, 21(4), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-01-2021-0005
Governments looking to improve service delivery, lower transaction costs, and combat corruption, digitizing public
procurement has become a strategic goal. The Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) of Nigeria launched the Government
Electronic-Procurement & Payment System (GePPS) in 2017. The effectiveness of government procurement between 2016 and
2022 is empirically assessed in this study. The study concludes that digitalization decreased average procurement cycle time by
27% and bid prices by 6.4% while increasing the number of qualified bidders per tender by 38% using a mixed-method design
that incorporates difference-in-differences (DiD) analysis of 1,847 contracts with policy documents, academic literature, and
institutional reports. Qualitative data indicates that the main mechanisms are vendor pre-qualification, real-time monitoring,
and e-reverse auctioning. However, vendor reluctance, low digital literacy, and restricted internet coverage hinder
improvements. Policy ideas for expanding digital procurement while addressing structural limitations are included in the
paper's conclusion,
Keywords :
E-Procurement, Digitalization, Public Procurement Efficiency, Bureau of Public Procurement, Nigeria, GePPS.